The People in Charge of Handling Sex Crimes Against Children are Implicated Themselves, So Don't Expect an Investigation
By andywarhaul at subreddit conspiracy
February 12, 2017 I see a lot of posts where people are getting impatient saying "where are the arrests?!" "What are they waiting for?!" "I've been hearing something big is coming for months what's going on this is all bullshit" and I just wanted to help put things into perspective and maybe shed some light on a few details.
If this is what we think it is, it's the crime if the century. Hillary/Bill Clinton and Co. are accused of everything from money laundering and child trafficking, to selling arms to warlords and toppling governments for financial gain.
- http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/tracking-the-clinton-controversies-from-whitewater-to-benghazi/396182/
- http://thepoliticalinsider.com/wikileaks-confirms-hillary-sold-weapons-isis-drops-another-bombshell-breaking-news/
- http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/
- http://truepundit.com/fbi-nypd-clinton-foundation-probed-for-global-money-laundering-financial-transactions-with-islamic-terror-groups/
- http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-25/clinton-silsby-trafficking-scandal-and-how-media-attempted-ignorecover-it
- https://news.vice.com/article/libyan-oil-gold-and-qaddafi-the-strange-email-sidney-blumenthal-sent-hillary-clinton-in-2011
https://www.youtube.com/user/georgwebb/videos?view=0&sort=da&flow=grid
As you can see these are big accusations to be throwing around with even bigger implications. So right off the bat we have to understand that bringing that kind of corruption to justice is going to take a lot of time and a lot of serious intervention and action on the part of the FBI, DOJ, and the House oversight committee among others. The fact that the Clintons and their crew have been running the political game for going on 30 years has made it impossible for any of those agencies to be effective in delivering justice. Examples:
- http://thebernreport.com/loretta-lynch-relationship-clintons/
- http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/john-podestas-achievements
- https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3933 http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/justice-department-pledges-quick-work-on-renewed-clinton-email-probe-230552
When the people in charge of handling these situations are implicated themselves nothing will happen. Not to mention being wary of the effect it will have on the relationship between the people and government.
But now that there is a new administration and the accused have lost control over the DOJ, the avenues for the investigation have opened up. We are only a few days into the new Attorney Generals DOJ and it would take in my opinion, a couple weeks at least to get organized and familiarized with the details of an investigation of this scale. This goes for the house oversight committee as well. They both need time to go over everything and make their reports/conclusions. This, however, also requires that they have all the pertinent information available to them. This means they need the 650,000 emails from the FBI. They were supposed to turn in all evidence on the Clinton Investigation that had been stored on their Datto Inc. Cloud storage drive by last Friday.
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017-01-27-JEC-to-Comey-FBI-Datto-Emails-due-2-10.pdf
So if they (FBI) did do this, the Committee now has the 650,000 emails and has to go through them all. Half a million documents that need to be heavily scrutinized as they could pertain to national security or a number of on going investigations. The FBI themselves said they needed 5 years to go through them (which I don't believe frankly). The point is it's going to take time.
Assuming the DOJ gets its new legs and starts going through the emails (if they have them) around the same time that the House Oversight Committee gets going on their investigation (sometime this week) then I think it's healthy to not expect anything to come out of the US gov/Justice system about this for at least a couple of months. The sheer amount of data to process is one factor that makes me think this but there are other big moving parts to this that have made me come to this conclusion.
There is an ongoing investigation into Odebrecht, a Brazilian construction company. It has been revealed that they were so deeply involved with corruption and bribery of international governments that they had a department devoted to it within their company.
- https://www.wsj.com/articles/odebrecht-to-pay-2-6-billion-to-settle-bribery-claims-1482325309
- https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/odebrecht-and-braskem-plead-guilty-and-agree-pay-least-35-billion-global-penalties-resolve
“Odebrecht and Braskem used a hidden but fully functioning Odebrecht business unit—a ‘Department of Bribery,’ so to speak—that systematically paid hundreds of millions of dollars to corrupt government officials in countries on three continents,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Suh....
Under their respective plea agreements, Odebrecht and Braskem are required to continue their cooperation with law enforcement, including in connection with the investigations and prosecutions of individuals responsible for the criminal conduct.If you read the whole release it details how the company was part of a massive bribery scheme where they gave out nearly a billion dollars in bribes to foreign politicians and businesses to obtain contracts.
We at least know that Odebrecht donated to the Clinton Foundation as they appear here on the $50,000-$100,000 donor category https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors?category=%2450%2C001%20to%20%24100%2C000&page=6
A little bit on the problem the Clinton Foundation causes when Hillary became Sec of State http://thefederalist.com/2016/08/29/clinton-foundation-allows-two-way-bribery/
A little bit on the Clintons and pay to play http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/clinton_pay_for_play.html
Then we have Odebrects contracts and projects in America http://www.odebrechtusa.com/projects
Quite a few
and then their projects in Libya http://www.odebrecht.com/en/marcelo-odebrecht-visits-odebrecht-projects-libya http://www.odebrecht.com/en/libya-airport https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=odebrecht+libya
And then we have this email exchange between Clintons lawyer Cheryl Mills, and Thomas Shannon, US ambassador to Brazil https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12907
In the emails there is concern raised by Mills about Brazils government not finding it necessary at the present time to recognize the newly formed Libyan Transitional National Council as a legitimate government. Thomas Shannon writes back and in his reply he says:
What surprises me about this public standoffishness by Brazil is that its companies have big contracts at stake, and these companies, Odebrecht in particular, brokered the initial contacts between the GOB and the TNC....
I will work back through these companies to urge them to reach out to Patriota.There is clear concern for the status of the contracts in Libya, particularly for Odebrecht.
So to sum that up we have a Brazilian company busted for having a department dedicated to bribing foreign politicians and businesses to the tune of nearly a billion dollars. That company has given money to at least one facet of the Clinton organization (between $50,000-$100,000) but as the DOJ stated they had a very sophisticated system to hide the payments. And we know Clinton has engaged in pay to play schemes. We then have this company receiving many contracts in the USA, Libya and other areas of Clinton influence. Followed up by Clintons top people, such as her lawyers, handling issues that would be a problem for this companies contracts by using access to ambassadors and foreign ministers.
Because of all this I believe that the Clinton's will also be implicated in the Odebrecht bribery investigation and the DOJ House Oversight Committee and FBI will all have to coordinate with this international investigation. Further complicating and slowing things down.
Teori Zavasck, the Brazilian Supreme Court judge investigating executives from Odebrecht, Latin America's largest construction firm, died in a plane crash on January 20, 2017. According to the report on the crash: "The Petrobras investigation gained much credibility when he was appointed to oversee the case in the Supreme Court. A few days from now, the court will start analysing the plea bargain deals struck with 77 executives from Odebrecht, which admitted corrupt deals with Petrobras. This has the potential to be the most explosive moment in the long-running Petrobras case, as new revelations are expected to be made against top politicians. Without Judge Zavascki at the helm of this process, Brazil's Supreme Court will have an extra challenge in convincing the public it can resist pressure from the powerful."
The bottom line of all of this is that this is a massive investigation that has implications that will rock the entire world. Nobody is nor should they be trying to rush through this. It has to be done right. We will probably start seeing the effects on the lower levels in waves continually over the next few months in relation to the various rackets (trafficking drugs kids etc). It's important to remember that PizzaGate is not just about child porn or child abuse, it's about an international trafficking ring. Podesta and Alefantis may very well be caught up in it but there are 10 layers of scum to get through first. This will take time. Be patient and expect nothing but disappointment as it will most likely not go down as as expect it to. Manage expectations because all we can do right now is continue to dig and wait.
Edit: I should add that I wouldn't get high hopes for the human trafficking investigations as long as Feinberg is in the White House. Clinton and crew will likely take the fall for it in one way or another and Dyncorp will try and weasel out.
END POST
Pizzagate In-depth Analysis:
https://aceloewgold.com/2017/02/12/despite-fake-news-ridicule-pizzagate-advances-far-beyond-logos-strange-artwork/
Pizzagate Executive Summary:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1497611
Pizzagate: A Primer:
https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/
Wikileaks Emails - Keyword Search:
comet (20 results, viewing 1 to 50)
pizza (149 results, viewing 1 to 50)
Lovettsville (12 results, viewing 1 to 50)
Stratfor
The
screengrab, clearly taken in the White House, the NYT used
to manipulate readers into believing that Pizzagate research is based on
universally absurd evidence.
"Recent nationwide human-trafficking and pedophile busts -- 23 law enforcement agencies spanning 14 states, averaging 36 arrests per day since Trump's inauguration -- may indicate
that law enforcement is closing in on the elite kingpins
of these vile crimes. However, it's easy to suspect that low-level
prosecutions are just a window display. Will the FBI and DHS will
continue to let those corrupting our government pursue their depraved
vices uninterrupted? What's worse, the CIA and other unelected officials are known to use child abuse as a tool for blackmailing and controlling power brokers. One theory is that Comet Pizza's owner Alefantis -- one of D.C's "Most Influential People" and ex-boyfriend of propaganda tycoon David Brock -- is a CIA operative abetting what's known as the "deep state shadow government" who are attempting a coup against the president." [Source]Democracy Raised from the Dead
By V. C. Bestor
December 22, 2016
Brief History of Global Pedo Rings
We can lend a sympathetic ear to abused children, even after they grow up. Another victim of a pedophile ring -- this one in Belgium -- just lunged bravely into public awareness, transforming before our eyes from victim to survivor.
Anneke Lucas is apparently a survivor of what's know as the Dutroux Affair. Dutroux was a murderous child trafficker whose wife got a shorter sentence in evident trade-off for Dutroux not naming government officials who had abused the tortured children.
Belgium's UNICEF branch was also involved in child porn. 350,000 citizens of the tiny nation took to the streets of Brussels dressed all in white, demanding the reform of a system so corrupt that it would protect the rapists and killers of children.
It's an unimaginable situation. Hence many of us in America didn't stretch our minds around the implications of our own Franklin Scandal. It didn't help that the cover-up was brutal:
The Franklin cover-up is still under way.
Child-porn use in the Pentagon is extensive yet the investigation was quashed.
Child trafficking is tied to U.S. Presidents. No big deal.
But we can bear witness to a similar high-level pedophile ring in Britain:
Abused orphans had to testify against prominent figures who were finally prosecuted for a pedophile ring that lasted decades in Portugal.
And, despite the mortal dangers, there are survivors in Australia who are speaking out about organized government-level pedophiles there:
The Netherlands also has violent perversions represented among (and between) government officials.
New York Times and other mainstream media scrubbed their coverage when Norway just busted a huge pedophile ring.
Hollywood pedophile rings are hushed up; Elijah Wood claims they're shielded by powerful figures in the film industry.Arrests of child pornographers are rarely covered in the media.
Jeffrey Epstein, convicted pedo-procurer, notoriously hobnobs with the likes of Bill Clinton. Hillary has protected child traffickers.
But there couldn't possibly be any truth to "Pizzagate" pedophiles operating in Washington DC, right? Despite this evidence...
There has been no actual investigation but trust authority anyway.
The author of this blog, VC Bestor, is an ordinary person, former victim of predators, and also Director of the non-profit FangedWilds.org
She taught sex-abuse awareness to kids in Portland, Oregon area schools for five years.
 |
| Nothing to see here: Pizza-man Alefantis threatens to murder researcher |
The Mysterious Case of the Disappearing Norway Incident
December 11, 2016
ACELOEWGOLD - On November 20th, when awareness of Pizzagate was growing but was still nowhere near its current level, news agency AP published an article about arrests made in connection with a pedophile ring in Norway. The ring included politicians, lawyers, and police, and included the rape of infants and people offering their own children for sexual purposes.
The story was republished in outlets including The New York Times, ABC, and The Washington Post. These newspapers, along with countless others, subscribe to the AP newswire, allowing them to re-post AP’s content. Several weeks later, after interest in Pizzagate had picked up enormously, researchers discovered when attempting to reference the articles that, in addition to others such as the Los Angeles Times, all three of these major outlets had removed them from their websites:
From my brief stint working for a newspaper, I am aware of two primary reasons for an article to be removed. One is because of factual errors, in which case the standard practice is to just issue a correction notice and fix the factual errors. It is very rare for an article to be so riddled with falsehoods that it is retracted entirely, and these cases are often highly publicized, such as in the case of the Rolling Stone rape article and the Stephen Glass scandal at The New Republic.
Another possible reason would be because it was deemed to not be newsworthy, but this is very rare. One can fairly safely assume neither of these apply to the AP article about the Norwegian pedophilia ring, which can still be found on the AP’s website and elsewhere. The question, then, is why did editors see it fit to scrub the article?
Articles from newswire services can come with certain licensing limitations, so it’s very concievable that an article would disappear from a third-party outlet once the term of the license had expired. However, since other news outlets are still carrying the identical AP story, this explanation seems unlikely as well.
Perhaps these news outlets thought it could appear damaging to their credibility to run stories claiming Pizzagate is nothing but an insane conspiracy theory, all alongside an article outlining exactly the kind of activities that the Pizzagate research has attempted to expose.
December 11, 2016
ACELOEWGOLD - On November 20th, when awareness of Pizzagate was growing but was still nowhere near its current level, news agency AP published an article about arrests made in connection with a pedophile ring in Norway. The ring included politicians, lawyers, and police, and included the rape of infants and people offering their own children for sexual purposes.
The story was republished in outlets including The New York Times, ABC, and The Washington Post. These newspapers, along with countless others, subscribe to the AP newswire, allowing them to re-post AP’s content. Several weeks later, after interest in Pizzagate had picked up enormously, researchers discovered when attempting to reference the articles that, in addition to others such as the Los Angeles Times, all three of these major outlets had removed them from their websites:
From my brief stint working for a newspaper, I am aware of two primary reasons for an article to be removed. One is because of factual errors, in which case the standard practice is to just issue a correction notice and fix the factual errors. It is very rare for an article to be so riddled with falsehoods that it is retracted entirely, and these cases are often highly publicized, such as in the case of the Rolling Stone rape article and the Stephen Glass scandal at The New Republic.
Another possible reason would be because it was deemed to not be newsworthy, but this is very rare. One can fairly safely assume neither of these apply to the AP article about the Norwegian pedophilia ring, which can still be found on the AP’s website and elsewhere. The question, then, is why did editors see it fit to scrub the article?
Articles from newswire services can come with certain licensing limitations, so it’s very concievable that an article would disappear from a third-party outlet once the term of the license had expired. However, since other news outlets are still carrying the identical AP story, this explanation seems unlikely as well.
Perhaps these news outlets thought it could appear damaging to their credibility to run stories claiming Pizzagate is nothing but an insane conspiracy theory, all alongside an article outlining exactly the kind of activities that the Pizzagate research has attempted to expose.
No comments:
Post a Comment