All U.S. Presidents Are Related

12 Year Old Girl Discovers That All But One US President Are Directly Related To Each Other

12 year-old BridgeAnne d’Avignon made an effort to trace back her genealogical roots in France, and decided to “branch out” to a different kind of Family Tree, searching through over 500,000 names and completing one of the greatest discoveries in Genealogical History.

Somehow this genius young lady managed to complete what even the greatest Genealogical groups have yet to prove. That all Presidents trace back to ONE British King… John Lackland Plantaganet, who was King of England in 1166 and signed the “Magna Carte” in 1215. He was given the nickname “Lackland” because he was the fifth son and there was originally no land left for him.

For anybody who is familiar with the “Illuminati” or the ruling Elite Families over our world, you probably already knew this and it comes at no news or surprise, especially if you knew that pretty much all our Presidents, including George Bush’s Jr. and Sr., Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter and even President Barack Obama are distant cousins to Elizabeth, The Queen of England.

However, BridgeAnne managed to make the first Family Tree of its kind, which not only traced back through Male family bloodlines of the Presidents, but since she was able to trace the Female sides of the family tree, she managed to link all Presidents except for one, Martin Van Buren, back to King John “Lackland” Plantanaget. In essence, as BridgeAnne explains it, ALL Presidents are Cousins, as well as Grandsons of King John.

Before BridgeAnne’s discovery, Genealogists were only able to link 22 Families of Presidents. Severeal years ago, National Geographic conducted a study where they attempted to find if there was in fact a “Scientific Adam“. They did in fact find that there is ONE Paternal Father over all the world, and traced that man back to Africa. BridgeAnne reiterates this notion when she said that her findings have led her to believe we all come from somewhere, it’s just a matter of proving it. And proving it she in fact just did.

If All Presidents Are Related, Which of The 2017 Candidates Will Be The Next President?

If anyone is still out there who thinks “elections” are how the presidents get put into office…  please explain how all 44 U. S. presidents (some research will say with the exception of only one - Martin Van Buren) are all related.  According to Burke’s Peerage, all 44 U. S. Presidents have carried European royal bloodlines into office - thereby all 44 being related.

34 of the 44 previous presidents have been direct genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne- the brutal eighth century King of the Franks and 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England.   In fact, the presidential candidate with the most royal genes has won every single American election.

“This information comes from Burke’s Peerage, which is the Bible of aristocratic genealogy, based in London. Every presidential election in America, since and including George Washington in 1789, to Bill Clinton, has been won by the candidate with the most British and French royal genes. Of the 42 presidents to Clinton, 33 have been related to two people: Alfred the Great, King of England, and Charlemagne, the most famous monarch of France. So it goes on: 19 of them are related to England’s Edward III, who has 2000 blood connections to Prince Charles. The same goes with the banking families in America. George Bush and Barbara Bush are from the same bloodline – the Pierce bloodline, which changed its name from Percy, when it crossed the Atlantic. Percy is one of the aristocratic families of Britain, to this day. They were involved in the Gunpowder Plot to blow up Parliament at the time of Guy Fawkes.” – Researcher/Author David Icke.

If America declared its Independence from the European monarchies in 1776, how is it possible that every single president has descended from European monarchs?  If presidents are democratically elected as we are told, what are the odds that we would always choose members of British and French royal bloodlines to lead us?  I don’t buy it.

“The Americas have always been owned and governed by the same royal families of Britain and Europe that conventional history states as being among those defeated during the wars of so-called ‘Independence.’” – Michael Tsarion, “Astrotheology and Sidereal Mythology”

Researchers like David Icke, Michael Tsarion, and Fritz Springmeier, along with foundations like the New England Historical Genealogy Society, Burkes Peerage, the Roman Piso Homepage, and other reliable genealogical sources, have documented these royal presidential bloodlines. Actually, by branching out far enough on the presidential family tree, the dedicated researcher will find that all 44 presidents share kinship, belonging to the same general ancestry, often called the 13th Illuminati bloodline, the Merovingian line, and/or the Windsor-Bush bloodline.

“If you go deeply enough into the genealogical research you will find that ALL the presidents are from this line …A spokesman for Burkes Peerage, the bible of royal and aristocratic genealogy based in London, has said that every presidential election since and including George Washington in 1789 has been won by the candidate with the most royal genes. Now we can see how and why. United States presidents are not chosen by ballot, they are chosen by blood!” – David Icke, “The Windsor-Bush Bloodline”

So, taking this information in…  one would wonder if we can predict the 2017 Presidential outcome.  Which candidate has royal blood?  Can you guess the answer? …

As it turns out, both Trump and Hillary Clinton are related to John of Gaunt, a 14th century royal. Gaunt, who was the 1st Duke of Lancaster, was the son of King Edward III.  According to MyHeritage, Trump is related through his mother, Mary Anne Macleod, back to his 17th great-grandfather, John Beaufort, while Clinton is related through her father and the Rodham family, back to her 17th great-grandmother, Joan Beaufort. The two candidates are 19th cousins. Neither has commented on this fact.

The Duke of Lancaster had the Beaufort children through his third wife, Katherine Swynford. Swynford had been his mistress, but later married Gaunt. His son by his first wife was King Henry IV.

If the Illuminati are as cunning as the world is now beginning to see, is it possible they have set up the perfect chess game?  They have an insurgent on both sides.  It doesn’t matter to them who wins-  either one will carry out their agenda.  Does that make you mad?  Are you awake to the Matrix in which you live, yet?

The US Presidents who descend from King John of England – and why you probably do too

The press, led by the Daily Mail and the New York Daily News, recently hailed the ‘remarkable discovery’ made by 12 year-old Californian genealogist BridgeAnne d’Avignon that 42 out of 43 US presidents have King John of England as a common ancestor.

King John, who ruled 1199-1216 AD, was not a particularly impressive figure in English history.  Nicknamed ‘Lackland’ by his father Henry II who thought he would never inherit substantial lands, he is renowned for being forced to sign the Magna Carta in 1215, which limited the monarch’s power by law, and for losing the Crown Jewels in The Wash.  But, by focussing on both male and female family lines, BridgeAnne traced an ancestral link to him that all US presidents share – bar one, Martin Van Buren.

But the most remarkable aspect of this story would be if Van Buren wasn’t descended from King John as well.

Boasting ‘royal blood’ isn’t about being born with a silver spoon in your mouth – even some US Presidents, such as Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, had famously humble backgrounds – it’s about mathematical probability.  Andrew Millard of the University of Durham calculated the probability that anyone with Anglo-Saxon ancestry descends from King Edward III (1312-1377) to be as high as 99.997%, and conservatively estimated that Edward III has around 100 million descendants in the British Isles, Europe and former British colonies, including the USA, Canada and Australia.

The reason why US Presidents, or you and I, can claim royal ancestry is down to what genealogists call ‘pedigree collapse’.  This happens when relatives (no matter how distantly related) marry, produce offspring and narrow a family tree through duplicate appearances on it.  The further back you go, the more duplicates you’ll find through multiple lines of descent.

If you trace your lineage back over generations, the theoretical number of individual ancestors in your tree grows exponentially and soon exceeds the population from which your ancestors could possibly be drawn.  If you go back 30 generations to the Middle Ages you would theoretically have over 1 billion ancestors on that generation line of your family tree, more than the population of the whole world at the time.  If you go back a further 10 generations to the Dark Ages you would have over a trillion ancestors, at a time when the planet’s population was around 200 million.  Divide your theoretical 1 trillion ancestors by the real population of 200 million, and the average ancestor would appear on your family tree 5,000 times.  This assumes of course that all of the 200 million alive in the Dark Ages were capable of producing children – many didn’t and so wouldn’t appear on anybody’s family tree, meaning that your more prolific ancestors would actually appear many more than 5,000 times.

Demographer Kenneth Wachter first illustrated this in his 1980 book Ancestors at the Norman Conquest, which calculated that in 1977 an average Englishman born in 1947 would have had 32,768 theoretical ancestors 15 generations ago (at 30 years between generations), around 1527 AD; of these, 96% would have been ‘real’ and 4% duplicates.  Going back 20 generations to 1377 AD and he would have over 1 million theoretical ancestors, 40% of which would be duplicates.  25 generations ago, around 1227 AD – not long after the reign of King John – he would have over 32 million theoretical ancestors, 94% of which would be duplicates and only 6% ‘real’, i.e. 2 million, or 80% of the estimated English population of 2.5 million at that time.

I’ve found an instance in my family tree where one individual, Nicholas Rimmer (1657-1717), features twice as an ancestor; once as my 8 x great grandfather through my direct paternal line, and again as my 8th x great grandfather through the lineage of a 4 x great grandmother.  My case of pedigree collapse is very mild compared to that of Alfonso XIII of Spain (1886-1931), who only had 4 great-grandparents instead of the expected 8 because of royal inbreeding.

Your true family tree is therefore diamond-shaped rather than an inverted pyramid.  The further back you go, the number of ancestors in each generation increases steadily up to a point, then slows, stops, then reduces.  And as there are fewer people to put on the branches of the 7 billion family trees of people living today, it is a mathematical certainty that, at some point, there will be an ancestor who appears at least once on everybody’s tree – the ‘most recent common ancestor’ of all humans currently alive.  A team led by Joseph Chang, a Yale professor of statistics, produced a complex computer model to estimate that this point was likely around 2,000 to 3,000 years ago.

The model accounted for complexities such as social barriers, physical barriers of geography and migration, and the impact of known events within the last 20,000 years.  It also introduced the ‘identical ancestors point’, between 5,000 and 7,000 years ago, where everybody living today has exactly the same set of ancestors.  In other words, every person who was alive at that time is either an ancestor to all 6.5 billion people living today, or their line died out and they have no remaining descendants.

This worldwide genealogical web is not so difficult to spin.  If the history of mankind has one common theme, it is our ability to get around the planet, whether it is the migration of the first Siberian hunter gatherers into North America; the conquering armies of Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great; the raping and pillaging hordes of Vikings, Mongols, and Huns; the Empire builders of Spain, Portugal and Britain; the refugees of the Irish Potato Famine; or even the odd shipwrecked sailor.  It takes just one ancestral link to a ‘foreign’ cultural group among your millions of ancestors, and you share ancestors with everyone in that group.  Through this, some geneticists estimate that everybody on Earth is at least 50th cousin to everybody else.

As Joseph Chang’s team concluded, “No matter the languages we speak or the colour of our skin, we share ancestors who planted rice on the banks of the Yangtze, who first domesticated horses on the steppes of the Ukraine, who hunted giant sloths in the forests of North and South America, and who laboured to build the Great Pyramid of Khufu.”

Or as statistician Jotun Hein of Oxford University remarked, “Had you entered any village on Earth in around 3,000 BC, the first person you would have met would probably be your ancestor.”

None of this should downplay the commendable work of a 12 year-old amateur genealogist in claiming that 42 out of 43 US Presidents descend from King John.  But it’s not a remarkable coincidence that suggests a genetic ‘quest for power’.  The remarkable bit is the statistical certainty which makes it so.  And consider this: 2,000 years from now it is likely that everyone on Earth will be descended from most of us; and if you have a line of descendants that doesn’t die out, you will also eventually become an ancestor of the whole world.

How All Presidents Are Related To King John

In my attempts to expose the genealogical “royal” bloodline – the passing of pure blood type as opposed to mere genealogical “family tree” relation – I came across a researcher from Ancestry.com named Tim Dowling. On his site, and reproduced below, Mr. Dowling has connected the trees of all U.S. Presidents to the Plantagenet King John circa 12oo A.D.

DIRECTIONS: To see the full charts or tree for each president, click on the “Relationship to King John” link below, and then on the next page click either the “tree” link or the link below that which looks like this:

This presentation will hopefully satisfy those who were not satisfied with my previous presentation of mere cousin relationships between all U.S. Presidents, which can partially be found at this link:

http://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html

Please click on the links in this chart for detailed geneology connections to the “royal” blood, and remember…

“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”

–Jewels of the Crown – “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”

Passing legitimate blood type is not the same as being “related” or cousins…

Again, special thanks and credit to Mr. Dowling long before that little bloodline 12 year old girl made international news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oYKMJkatzI

Obama is related to Bush and Cheney