[The] man of sin [shall] be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 KJV)
Jesus saith, "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6 KJV)
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. (Romans 10:13 KJV)
August 12, 2021
Reasons Why You Shouldn't Get the COVID Injection
Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee
August 12, 2021, JunkyardSam wrote on subreddit nonewnormal, which has been "quarantined":
Lots of creepy comments encouraging you to take it. I advise otherwise. Do what you want, but here's random reasons why you shouldn't:
It doesn't stop you from getting it
It doesn't stop you from spreading it to others
It supposedly "lessens your symptoms" but we don't know if that's true, because "Delta Variant" has already evolved to be more like a common cold
The vaccine uses an unusual new mRNA technology that hasn't been tested longterm
One of the creators, Robert Malone, has come out warning people against it.
Numerous doctors, scientists, and medical workers have warned against it -- and creepily they are censored and blacklisted. These are people who have no financial incentive to put their reputations on the line. They get nothing out of it except a difficult time finding employment in the future but feeling good about at least trying to speak out. Whistleblowers, basically.
There is an incredible coverup going on in regard to the side effects and deaths. In most places you can't even talk about them. What do they have to hide?
It's not normal to push such a new, unproven thing onto children and even pregnant women. Why are they doing this?
Hardly any young people die from Covid. Only 721 people in 2020 according to CDC. So why are we pushing this on children?
They've lied about numbers from the start, so how can we trust them about anything?!
The manufacturers can't be held accountable if you are injured by the injection. There are people all over needing help with medical bills because no one is there to help them after they get Bell's Palsy, have heart issues after the shot, etc.
My own dad went into mental decline after taking the Pfizer. He's 75, so it could be coincidental but... he was fine before the shots. Anecdotal but...
Numerous people in my life have changed, strangely, after taking the shots. Again, this is anecdotal, but they seem to become less energized, more lethargic, more irritable. It's strange, and I can't prove it other than it's just what I see.
I've seen two people in my life get Delta Variant who were fully vaccinated. They transmitted it to my family, but for us it ranged from asymptomatic to a minor cold.
The creepiest thing of all though is all the FORCE, COERCION, division, hate, anger, rage, propaganda, lies, and censorship.
That last one is enough, for me, to say no. Something is fundamentally wrong.
PS. Listen to Dr. Charles Hoffe about the micro clotting issue. Read about what happened in regard to ADE with previous coronavirus vaccines. Read about what happened with animal testing. Read about spike proteins and their relation to prion disease.
By all means, do what you want... But only people who are either uninformed on what's actually going on — or people who are financially incentivized by pharmaceutical corporations — think it's a good idea.
Visit r / covidvaccinated ... Keep in mind that's a highly censored forum with something like 80% of posts removed, but STILL it's full of side effects.
We don't know yet what the LONG TERM side effects are.
Not worth the gamble, IMHO, and their rush to eliminate the control group is incredibly fishy.
Beware anyone here who advises you get it. NNN is FILLED with shills and covert encouragement to get the shots now.
If these vaccines were so great, they wouldn't have to censor doctors and they wouldn't have to force it on us.
Just look what they've done to the country in the last year and a half... And we're supposed to trust them with an injection?! After sowing division and hate in the citizenry?
The people running things right now are clearly bad people. I would go so far as to say treasonous and even "evil."
If you think that's extreme, just take a look at what's happening in the schools with masks and plastic bubbles and playgrounds full of "social distancing squares."
If that's the world you want to live in then, by all means, take the shots, because THAT is the new normal. Oppression, authoritarianism, and mandatory vaccinations with experimental new untested injections.
Most of us here are saying, "No New Normal!"
I think right now no one actually knows what precisely is causing the side effects and what the long-term side effects may be... So we have various doctors giving their thoughts about what they think it might be.
They could be right? They could be wrong.
The thing is... we don't know. And that's the problem.
They're trying to force these experimental injections on us and it's like... I don't care about Covid-19. If I get it it'll be like nothing. I'm almost certain I already had it when it passed through the office in my region before we were sent to work from home. I had the side effects including loss of sense of smell/taste. But I was sick for a day... And back to work the next. Not a big deal. And everyone makes a big deal about the "loss of smell" but that's a standard side effect for any nasal infection. It's common.
Then a fully vaccinated family member came over to show off his new Porsche. Coughing, sneezing, and snotting all over. Got us sick with Delta Variant. But who cares? My wife was asymptomatic. I had minor sniffles. My kids had "minor colds" for a couple of days. One kid had a slight fever and went to bed a little early one evening and woke up better the next day. Who cares?!
That's why they have to spend so much time and money turning this relatively harmless virus into the boogeyman. Fact is, 99.7% of people who get it will get over it with no problem... And that last 0.3%? That's not random... It's almost entirely people who don't take care of themselves, or people that are so old they're going to die anyway.
So --- why should I have to inject myself and my family, who I am here to protect, with an experimental injection that has killed THOUSANDS and injured HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS?!
The virus is not a threat to us, simple as that... And yet we're called selfish?! By people who want to force an injection onto us that IS a threat?!
Who's selfish here?!
Do you know about yandex.com -- it's an alternative search engine, very different from the others.
The one thing I can share that I've contributed to the community is this timeline:
You need to paste it into a document or email for the links to become clickable. I keep it on pastebin because everywhere else gets censored.
There's a good set of links at the bottom, and some pretty wild stuff in there. Not everything is guaranteed to be connected, but if you read through you'll find out about the World Bank Pandemic Bonds and the relationship between the governors sending people to their deaths in the nursing homes. This was a money laundering scheme that financed this global operation.
As far as I can tell, this is my discovery. No one else has made those connections, but it's real interesting.
Some of those governors actually forbade the nursing homes from testing incoming patients... And the patients were not even elderly -- they were all ages. There's a famous case where a 20 year old that was sent in bludgeoned a 75 year old to death.
Also, it wasn't just the governors -- it happened in other countries. They death count needed to increase by a certain date in order to officially declare a pandemic, which would trigger holding of the funds instead of returning them to the investors... And then the funds were distributed globally.
Money laundering. What's worse? Who bought these bonds? A lot of purchases came from retirement funds and pensions.
What would you have thought about your pension money being invested in bonds that will not pay out if there is a pandemic?
The crazy thing is the organizations involved in selling these pandemic bonds were actively warning the world about a "coming pandemic" as they were simultaneously selling them.
But I can't get anyone interested in the story. It's all right there. We have the prospectus in archive.org (they have since removed it.)
Anyhow, it's a story that someone big like Glenn Greenwald would need to break, with more detailed analysis... But no one's going to go near it because it's touching on extreme controversy with the most powerful people and organizations in the world.
Weather the storm. It will be hard for a while, but we'll win in the end. They're pushing fast because they know the long term side effects are beginning to emerge. First with Delta Variant, and ... just wait for this fall and the next.
Read about ADE. Antibody-dependent enhancement. It's happening...
Good post dude. Yeah I’m seeing some interesting posts on here now that I didn’t see at all before today. Number 15 is like the only reason I need to not get it. I don’t even have to research it to not trust that shit when they are foaming at the mouth about absolutely everyone having one. All the stuff I’ve ever heard when it comes to new world order or Illuminati or totalitarian government points to a big event just like this for a big power grab. And just something about everyone being so fuckin psycho about everyone taking it doesn’t sit right with me. So fuck it im holding out to the bitter end. I never really flew or traveled anyway. Fuck them. There’s plenty of places for me to still visit in Texas. So if I have to stay in my own state then fuck them I will. But I’m not taking the jab no matter what. Fuck that shit.
My rant on social media this morning has been I just want people to be aware of the risks associated with the vaccine. This is an experimental biological treatment that has resulted in long-term, serious injury and death. The big pharma companies have zero liability against these incidents too. I follow a doctor that strongly pushes the vaccine, and I confronted him, very politely, asking him to please make people aware that there are risks. It's just not 100% safe. I am 100% free choice, 0% believing there is no risk, and that's what the media is portraying.
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.
I almost succumbed to the fear campaign to get vaxxed. This community helped me crawl out of that fear hole and accept my choice not to Vax. The media will make you feel like you're the only one, and you're going to die because of your mistakes. Even after this thread is eventually gone completely, never forget that you aren't alone and there are plenty of people who are going to stand with you when it comes down to it. Peace love and prayers for all of you guys.
Ask anyone why they are getting the vaccine. Is it because they are scared of COVID? No. It's because
I want to travel
I don't want to lose my job
I want the lockdowns to end
All my friends got it
Nobody is even getting it for the right reasons, the only reason which would be "I am scared of dying from COVID". Almost like everyone recognizes the threat of COVID is minuscule compared to the threat of authority.
They're moving on a timeline we don't know, and falling back so they are pushing harder.
The title of a YT French news report "Desire for vaccines is slowing down annoying the government" (Link in case someone thinks I'm full of shit).
Something stinks! And the only idea I have is from another NNN member who mentioned "They want 99% vaccination so that when the side effects show up they can NOT blame the vaccines".
The investment and security pact would vastly extend China’s influence in the Middle East, throwing Iran an economic lifeline and creating new flash points with the United States.
By Farnaz Fassihi and Steven Lee Myers, The New York Times
Published July 11, 2020, Updated November 30, 2020
Iran and China have quietly drafted a sweeping economic and security partnership that would clear the way for billions of dollars of Chinese investments in energy and other sectors, undercutting the Trump administration’s efforts to isolate the Iranian government because of its nuclear and military ambitions.
The partnership, detailed in an 18-page proposed agreement obtained by The New York Times, would vastly expand Chinese presence in banking, telecommunications, ports, railways and dozens of other projects.
In exchange, China would receive a regular — and, according to an Iranian official and an oil trader, heavily discounted — supply of Iranian oil over the next 25 years.
The document also describes deepening military cooperation, potentially giving China a foothold in a region that has been a strategic preoccupation of the United States for decades. It calls for joint training and exercises, joint research and weapons development and intelligence sharing — all to fight “the lopsided battle with terrorism, drug and human trafficking and cross-border crimes.”
The partnership — first proposed by China’s leader, Xi Jinping, during a visit to Iran in 2016 — was approved by President Hassan Rouhani’s cabinet in June, Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, said last week.
Iranian officials have publicly stated that there is a pending agreement with China, and one Iranian official, as well as several people who have discussed it with the Iranian government, confirmed that it is the document obtained by The Times, which is labeled “final version” and dated June 2020.
It has not yet been submitted to Iran’s Parliament for approval or made public, stoking suspicions in Iran about how much the government is preparing to give away to China.
In Beijing, officials have not disclosed the terms of the agreement, and it is not clear whether Mr. Xi’s government has signed off or, if it has, when it might announce it.
If put into effect as detailed, the partnership would create new and potentially dangerous flash points in the deteriorating relationship between China and the United States.
It represents a major blow to the Trump administration’s aggressive policy toward Iran since abandoning the nuclear deal reached in 2015 by President Barack Obama and the leaders of six other nations after two years of grueling negotiations.
Renewed American sanctions, including the threat to cut off access to the international banking system for any company that does business in Iran, have succeeded in suffocating the Iranian economy by scaring away badly needed foreign trade and investment.
But Tehran’s desperation has pushed it into the arms of China, which has the technology and appetite for oil that Iran needs. Iran has been one of the world’s largest oil producers, but its exports, Tehran’s largest source of revenue, have plunged since the Trump administration began imposing sanctions in 2018; China gets about 75 percent of its oil from abroad and is the world’s largest importer, at more than 10 million barrels a day last year.
At a time when the United States is reeling from recession and the coronavirus, and increasingly isolated internationally, Beijing senses American weakness. The draft agreement with Iran shows that unlike most countries, China feels it is in a position to defy the United States, powerful enough to withstand American penalties, as it has in the trade war waged by President Trump.
“Two ancient Asian cultures, two partners in the sectors of trade, economy, politics, culture and security with a similar outlook and many mutual bilateral and multilateral interests will consider one another strategic partners,” the document says in its opening sentence.
The Chinese investments in Iran, which two people who have been briefed on the deal said would total $400 billion over 25 years, could spur still more punitive actions against Chinese companies, which have already been targeted by the administration in recent months.
“The United States will continue to impose costs on Chinese companies that aid Iran, the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism,” a State Department spokeswoman wrote in response to questions about the draft agreement.
“By allowing or encouraging Chinese companies to conduct sanctionable activities with the Iranian regime, the Chinese government is undermining its own stated goal of promoting stability and peace.”
The expansion of military assistance, training and intelligence-sharing will also be viewed with alarm in Washington. American warships already tangle regularly with Iranian forces in the crowded waters of the Persian Gulf and challenge China’s internationally disputed claim to much of the South China Sea, and the Pentagon’s national security strategy has declared China an adversary.
When reports of a long-term investment agreement with Iran surfaced last September, China’s foreign ministry dismissed the question out of hand. Asked about it again last week, a spokesman, Zhao Lijian, left open the possibility that a deal was in the works.
“China and Iran enjoy traditional friendship, and the two sides have been in communication on the development of bilateral relations,” he said. “We stand ready to work with Iran to steadily advance practical cooperation.”
The projects — nearly 100 are cited in the draft agreement — are very much in keeping with Mr. Xi’s ambitions to extend its economic and strategic influence across Eurasia through the “Belt and Road Initiative,” a vast aid and investment program.
The projects, including airports, high-speed railways and subways, would touch the lives of millions of Iranians. China would develop free-trade zones in Maku, in northwestern Iran; in Abadan, where the Shatt al-Arab river flows into the Persian Gulf, and on the gulf island Qeshm.
The agreement also includes proposals for China to build the infrastructure for a 5G telecommunications network, to offer the new Chinese Global Positioning System, Beidou, and to help Iranian authorities assert greater control over what circulates in cyberspace, presumably as China’s Great Firewall does.
The American campaign against a major Chinese telecommunications company, Huawei, includes a criminal case against its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, for seeking to disguise investments in Iran in order to evade American sanctions. The Trump administration has barred Huawei from involvement in 5G development in the United States, and has tried, without great success, to persuade other countries to do the same.
Moving ahead with a broad investment program in Iran appears to signal Beijing’s growing impatience with the Trump administration after its abandonment of the nuclear agreement. China has repeatedly called on the administration to preserve the deal, which it was a party to, and has sharply denounced the American use of unilateral sanctions.
Iran has traditionally looked west toward Europe for trade and investment partners. Increasingly though, it has grown frustrated with European countries that have opposed Mr. Trump’s policy but quietly withdrawn from the kinds of deals that the nuclear agreement once promised.
“Iran and China both view this deal as a strategic partnership in not just expanding their own interests but confronting the U.S.,” said Ali Gholizadeh, an Iranian energy researcher at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei. “It is the first of its kind for Iran keen on having a world power as an ally.”
The proposed partnership has nonetheless stoked a fierce debate within Iran. Mr. Zarif, the foreign minister, who traveled to Beijing last October to negotiate the agreement, faced hostile questioning about it in Parliament last week.
The document was provided to The Times by someone familiar with its drafting with the intention of showing the scope of the projects now under consideration.
Mr. Zarif said the agreement would be submitted to Parliament for final approval. It has the support of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, two Iranian officials said.
Ayatollah Khamenei’s top economic adviser, Ali Agha Mohammadi, appeared on state television recently to discuss the need for an economic lifeline. He said Iran needs to increase its oil production to at least 8.5 million barrels a day in order to remain a player in the energy market, and for that, it needs China.
Iranian supporters of the strategic partnership say that given the country’s limited economic options, the free-falling currency and the dim prospect of U.S. sanctions being lifted, the deal with China could provide a lifeline.
“Every road is closed to Iran,” said Fereydoun Majlesi, a former diplomat and a columnist for several Iranian newspapers on diplomacy. “The only path open is China. Whatever it is, until sanctions are lifted, this deal is the best option.”
But critics across the political spectrum in Iran have raised concerns that the government is secretly “selling off” the country to China in a moment of economic weakness and international isolation. In a speech in late June, a former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, called it a suspicious secret deal that the people of Iran would never approve.
The critics have cited previous Chinese investment projects that have left countries in Africa and Asia indebted and ultimately beholden to the authorities in Beijing. A particular concern has been the proposed port facilities in Iran, including two along the coast of the Sea of Oman.
One at Jask, just outside of the Strait of Hormuz, the entrance to the Persian Gulf, would give the Chinese a strategic vantage point on the waters through which much of the world’s oil transits. The passage is of critical strategic importance to the United States, whose Navy’s Fifth Fleet is headquartered in Bahrain, in the gulf.
China has already constructed a series of ports along the Indian Ocean, creating a necklace of refueling and resupply stations from the South China Sea to the Suez Canal. Ostensibly commercial in nature, the ports potentially have military value, too, allowing China’s rapidly growing navy to expand its reach.
Those include ports at Hambantota in Sri Lanka and Gwadar in Pakistan, which are widely criticized as footholds for a potential military presence, though no Chinese forces have officially been deployed at them.
China opened its first overseas military base in Djibouti in 2015, ostensibly to support its forces participating in international antipiracy operations off the coast of Somalia. The outpost, which began as a logistics base but is now more heavily fortified, is within miles of the American base in that country.
China has also stepped up military cooperation with Iran. The People’s Liberation Army Navy has visited and participated in military exercises at least three times, beginning in 2014. The most recent was last December, when a Chinese missile destroyer, the Xining, joined a naval exercise with the Russian and Iranian navies in the Gulf of Oman.
China’s state-owned Xinhua news agency quoted the commander of Iran’s Navy, Rear Adm. Hossein Khanzadi, saying that the exercise showed “the era of American invasions in the region is over.”
David E. Sanger contributed reporting. Claire Fu in Beijing contributed research.
The American “maximum pressure” campaign has clearly had a major impact on Iran, but a massive influx of Chinese investments will go a long way towards undoing it.
By LAHAV HARKOV, Jerusalem Post
July 14, 2020
With Iran and China working on a multibillion-dollar 25-year economic and security deal, Israel has many reasons to be concerned and even alarmed.
The proposed agreement, leaked to The New York Times, which reported on it on Saturday, would lead to a closer military relationship between Tehran and Beijing, including joint military exercises, research and weapons development and intelligence sharing.
It would also increase Chinese investments in Iranian banking, telecommunications and transportation, such as airports and railways. China would reportedly get a discounted supply of Iranian oil in return.
The document describes the countries as “two ancient Asian countries... with a similar outlook” that “will consider one another strategic partners.”
Neither side has publicly confirmed that the document is genuine, that they have signed it or that there is any such agreement. When asked about a deal with Iran last week, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said:
“China and Iran enjoy traditional friendship, and the two sides have been in communication on the development of bilateral relations. We stand ready to work with Iran to steadily advance practical cooperation.”
Meanwhile, there is public debate in Iran about whether the agreement could be a debt trap, with former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking out against it. The agreement has been in the works for a long time – Chinese leader Xi Jinping first proposed it on a visit to Tehran in 2016 – and the timing for the recent progress likely has to do with Iran being especially economically weak these days.
According to Carice Witte, executive director of SIGNAL, a think tank focused on China-Israel relations: “This is indicative of the Chinese approach, [to] identify where there is a vulnerability and then patiently look for ways to capitalize on it.”
China has much to gain from the deal besides a discount on gas when energy prices are plummeting anyway. The agreement fits into China’s Belt and Road Initiative to build infrastructure across the world, while bringing Iran into its orbit of influence. It also would bolster China’s new digital currency e-RMB as a way to bypass American systems and reduce the power of the dollar – another way in which the deal could hurt Israel if it comes to fruition.
Plus, China would gain power and influence in Iran, a diplomatic card it can play with respect to the US and garner greater leverage in the Gulf.
For Israel, the potential for damage from such an agreement is clear.
AS WITTE said, “Any dollar going into the Iranian system is one that can likely be spent against Israel.”
This is especially clear when it comes to the bolstering of Iran’s military through cooperation with China. Any of the new resources directed to the Islamic Republic’s army can potentially – and likely will – be turned on Israel.
Another part of the deal may be a massive sale of weapons to Iran. A recent Pentagon report said China seeks to sell Iran attack helicopters, fighter jets, tanks and more once the UN arms embargo expires in October.
While Israelis and Israel supporters may find it hard to believe, the Chinese government truly does not think Iran is a danger to Israel, Witte said.
“China’s perception is that Iran doesn’t mean what it says about destroying Israel,” she said. “China does not see Iran as an existential threat to Israel and that Iran is only saying [it wants to destroy Israel] to be taken seriously by the world’s power centers.”
Israel and the US have been pushing UN Security Council members to extend the arms embargo on Iran that began under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers. Israel and the US have cited Tehran’s violations of that deal and continued attempts to build up its nuclear program, for which the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly rapped Iran in recent weeks, as well as its sponsorship of terrorism and warfare through proxies around the Middle East.
But Chinese Ambassador to the UN Zhang Jun last week said his country opposes US attempts to activate the JCPOA’s “snapback sanctions” mechanism.
The return of US sanctions in 2018 has led to a major economic crisis in Iran and subsequent political instability. This empowered hard-liners to say Iran never should have made a deal involving the US in the first place. They won a decisive majority of Iran’s parliament in an election this year.
But it also has led to protesters taking to the streets this year, protesting a government that uses its money to pay for wars in other countries instead of helping its own people. Experts say the regime is as unpopular as it has ever been since the Islamic Revolution.
The US “maximum pressure” campaign has clearly had a major impact on Iran, but a massive influx of Chinese investments will go a long way toward undoing it, effectively relieving the pressure.
Another concern is regarding Chinese companies’ involvement in infrastructure projects in Israel and Iran. This is already taking place, but the 25-year agreement would deepen those ties.
A Jerusalem Post investigation last month found that three of the six international groups bidding on the tender to build two lines of the Tel Aviv light rail include Chinese-owned companies that also worked on railway projects in Iran. These state-owned companies include China Railway Engineering Corporation, China Harbour Engineering Company, China Communications Construction Company and its China Railway Construction Corporation.
A report by the RAND research institute this year warned that due to China’s close ties with Iran, the Chinese government could have companies share insights on Israel with Tehran to gain favor and influence. In addition, China could use the companies operating in Israel and Iran for political leverage on Israel, such as in 2013, when it conditioned a Beijing visit by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on his stopping defense officials from testifying in a New York federal lawsuit against the Bank of China for laundering Iranian money for Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
The US is waiting to see what actual agreement emerges, and it will continue to take action against any Chinese company breaking sanctions, a State Department source said. For example, the US is pursuing criminal charges against Chinese telecom company Huawei’s CFO Meng Wanzhou for attempting to avoid US sanctions by hiding investments in Iran.
The Prime Minister’s Office declined to comment on this matter, but it is likely eyeing the China-Iran agreement with concern.
Iran has
quietly moved record amounts of crude oil to top client China in recent
months, while India’s state refiners have added Iranian oil to their
annual import plans on the assumption that U.S. sanctions on the OPEC
supplier will soon ease, according to six industry sources and Refinitiv
data.
U.S.
President Joe Biden has sought to revive talks with Iran on a nuclear
deal abandoned by former President Donald Trump in 2018, although harsh
economic measures remain in place that Tehran insists be lifted before
negotiations resume.
The
National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) has started reaching out to
customers across Asia since Biden took office to assess potential demand
for its crude, said the sources, who declined to be named because of
the sensitivity of the matter.
The
sanctions caused a precipitous drop in Iranian exports to China, India,
Japan and South Korea since late 2018. Those measures, and output cuts
by fellow OPEC+ producers, have led to tight supplies of Middle East
sour crude in Asia, the top global oil market. Asia imports more than
half of its crude from the Middle East.
“They
talked to us. They said: ‘very soon they hope to resume oil supplies.’
We said: ‘Inshallah’,” said one source at an Indian refiner. “Inshallah”
is an Arabic term that means “God willing,” used to express that the
speaker hopes something will happen.
GRAPHIC: China's Iranian oil purchases hit record in early 2021 -
Restored
Iranian supplies to India, the world’s third-largest crude importer,
could reduce demand for spot cargoes, which has climbed recently after
Iraq cut supplies and Kuwait reduced the duration of some contracts.
India,
which is hurting from the recent sustained recovery in global crude
prices, expects Iranian supplies to return to the market in 3 to 4
months, a government official said.
Another
Indian refiner said they had been told by NIOC officials that a formal
agreement on crude supply would be signed after Iran’s elections in
June. NIOC has also reached out to other Asian customers.
“Recently
NIOC called us, asking about demand,” said a trader at an east Asian
refiner. “It looks like Iran is getting ready to return to the market.”
Another
refining source said the talks were “very initial” and that NIOC wanted
to know whether the company would resume Iranian oil purchases. The
sources declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter.
CHINA
Unlike India, China never completely halted Iranian oil imports.
Iran
moved about 17.8 million tonnes (306,000 barrels per day) of crude into
China during the past 14 months, with volumes reaching record levels in
January and February, according to Refinitiv Oil Research.
Of
these, about 75% were “indirect” imports identified as oil from Oman,
the United Arab Emirates or Malaysia, which entered China mainly via
ports in eastern Shandong province, home to most of China’s independent
refiners, or Yingkou port in northeastern Liaoning province.
GRAPHIC: China's indirect Iranian oil imports by ports -
The
remaining 25% of imports were marked as official purchases for China’s
Strategic Petroleum Reserves, Refinitiv said, as Beijing maintains a
small purchase volume despite U.S. sanctions.
GRAPHIC: Oman, Malaysia UAE crude flows to China -
“Volumes
started to surge from the last quarter of 2020, with Shandong province
as the top receiving region which indicates independent plants are the
main consumers,” said Emma Li, a Refinitiv crude flows analyst.
Tankers
carrying Iranian oil typically switch off their transponders when
loading to avoid detection, but then become traceable via satellites
near ports in Oman, the UAE and Iraq. Some transfer part of their
cargoes to other ships near Singapore or Malaysia before sailing to
China, Li said.
Reuters is unable to identify the end buyers for these cargoes.
Without
commenting directly on the oil transactions, the Spokesman’s Office of
China’s Foreign Ministry said: “Iran is a friendly nation to China and
the two nations have maintained normal exchanges and cooperation. The
cooperation between China and Iran under the framework of international
laws is both reasonable and legitimate, and deserves respect and
protection.”
NIOC
declined to comment. An official at the country’s Oil Ministry said, “When the unjust U.S. sanctions are lifted, Iran will be able to sell
its oil to any country, and I can assure you that many contracts will be
signed.”
Geneva-based
tanker tracker Petro-Logistics said Iranian oil loadings in January
exceeded 600,000 bpd for the first time since May 2019, a sign that the
end of Donald Trump’s term may be changing buyer behavior.
Indirect
shipment arrivals in February, including those waiting to discharge off
Chinese ports, reached nearly 850,000 bpd, beating the daily record of
790,000 bpd set in April 2019, according to Refinitiv and Chinese
customs data.
Chinese
customs data showed on Sunday that crude imports rose 4% annually in
the first two months of this year. It will release details for the
breakdown by country of origin this month.
“Iranian
stuff started to slip into Shandong from late 2019... started with some
cash-stripped refiners which processed oil first before paying for the
cargo,” said an independent Chinese trader familiar with some of the
transactions.
Most of these transactions were settled in Chinese currency or euros to circumvent U.S. scrutiny, the trader said.
The record imports have weighed on prices for competing medium and heavy grades from other Middle East producers, traders said.
“While it does not seem that the sanction will be lifted anytime soon, Iran has resurfaced,” another trade source said.
The report published by the Wall Street Journal on Thursday about Israel's operations targeting Iranian ships explains many of the developments that have taken place in the Middle East over the last two years. It also provides, belatedly, a glimpse of the ...
The Great Reset to Feudalism
"Globalist totalitarian fascism is progressing across the globe so rapidly that the world will be in an either or situation very soon. Either the world globalizes under the Global Reset program being pushed by the elitists, or this agenda will fail because we will be in a world war in short order.
I think there must be a world war because things are just not fully set up yet for prophetic events to play out as written. I also do not think we can get there through just the Great Reset plan. Besides that, what is now occurring on earth is obviously being orchestrated by spiritual rulers in high places. Their demonic prophets already told us three world wars will be necessary to bring in their globalist one world agenda." - Don Koenig, March 12, 2021
G Edward Griffin Describes The ENDGAME!, uploaded by Jason Bermas (Internet of "things" — you borrow or rent everything)
German Neurologist Warns Against Wearing Facemasks: ‘Oxygen Deprivation Causes Permanent Neurological Damage’
By Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD
October 14, 2020
Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD is a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist with a PhD in Pharmacology, with special interest in neurotoxicology, environmental medicine, neuroregeneration and neuroplasticity. The following is a written transcript of some highlights from Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson‘s recent and extremely pressing video message, which was translated from German into English by Claudia Stauber.
Nerve cells in the hippocampus can’t be longer than three minutes without oxygen—they cannot survive.
Masks are depriving your brain of oxygen, causing irreversible damage.
The human brain is very sensitive to oxygen deprivation.
The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of reaction time—reactions of the cognitive system.
When you have chronic oxygen deprivation, all of those symptoms disappear, because you get used to it. But your efficiency will remain impaired.
While you’re thinking that you have gotten used to wearing your mask and rebreathing your own exhaled air, the degenerative processes in your brain are getting amplified as your oxygen deprivation continues.
The damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.
And the under-supply of oxygen in your brain continues to progress.
We know that neurodegenerative diseases take years to decades to develop. If today you forget your phone number, the breakdown in your brain would have already started 20 or 30 years ago.
The second problem is that the nerve cells in your brain are unable to divide themselves normally.
So in case our governments will generously allow us to get rid of the masks and go back to breathing oxygen freely again in a few months,the lost nerve cells will no longer be regenerated. What is gone is gone.
For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no.
Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain.
Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth.
Their brains also are incredibly active, as the brain has so much to learn.
The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain, is thirsting for oxygen.
The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires.
In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.
To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal.
The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology.
There is no unfounded medical exemption from face masks—because oxygen deprivation is dangerous for every single brain.
Whether they want to wear a mask—that is absolutely ineffective to protect themselves from a virus—it must be the free decision of every human being.
Consciously and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.
An absolute medical contraindication in medicine means that this drug, this therapy, this method or measure should not be used, and is not allowed to be used.
To coerce an entire population to use an absolute medical contraindication by force, there must be definite and serious reasons for this, and the reasons must be presented to competent interdisciplinary and independent bodies to be verified and authorized.
When, in ten years, dementia is going to increase exponentially, and the younger generations couldn’t reach their God-given potential, it won’t help to say “we didn’t need the masks.”
Please, dear colleagues, we all have to wake up.
I know how damaging oxygen deprivation is for the brain, cardiologists know how damaging it is for the heart, pulmonologists know how damaging it is for the lungs.
Oxygen deprivation damages every single organ.
How can a veterinarian, a software distributor, a businessman, an electrical car manufacturer, and a physicist decide on matters regarding the health of the entire population?
Where are our health departments, our health insurance, our medical associations? It would have been their duty to be vehemently against the lockdown and to stop it and stop it from the very beginning.
Why do the medical boards issue punishments to doctors who give people exemptions? Does the person or the doctor seriously have to prove that oxygen deprivation harms people? What kind of medicine are our doctors and medical associations representing?
Who is responsible for this crime? The ones who want to enforce it? The ones who let it happen and play along, or the ones who don’t prevent it?
It’s not about masks, it’s not about viruses, it’s certainly not about your health.
It is about much much more.
I am not participating. I am not afraid.
You can notice, they are already taking our air to breathe.
The imperative of the hour is personal responsibility. We are responsible for what we think, not the media. We are responsible for what we do, not our superiors. We are responsible for our health, not the World Health Organization. And we are responsible for what happens in our country, not the government.
I do not wear a mask, I need my brain to think. I want to have a clear head when I deal with my patients, and not be in a carbon dioxide-induced anaesthesia.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset (Excerpts)
Born in Ravensburg in 1938, Klaus Schwab is a child of Adolf Hitler’s Germany, a police-state regime built on fear and violence, on brainwashing and control, on propaganda and lies, on industrialism and eugenics, on dehumanization and “disinfection,” on a chilling and grandiose vision of a “new order” that would last a thousand years. Hitler’s new Nazi normal was meant to last for a thousand years, a millennium, but came crashing down 988 years ahead of target. What degree of “force” and “coercive measures” will Schwab be prepared to accept in order to ensure the dawning of his technocratic new age?
In 2004, Israel awarded Klaus Schwab the $1 million Dan David Prize “for his significant contribution in fostering international dialogue and activism to resolve some of the world's greatest issues.”
Schwab is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.
The original fascist project in Italy and Germany was all about a merger of state and business.
Fascism in the 21st century has found different political forms through which to continue its core project of reshaping humanity to suit capitalism through blatantly authoritarian means.
This new fascism today is being advanced in the guise of global governance, biosecurity, the “New Normal”, the “New Deal for Nature”, and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”.
Schwab and his accomplices are using the COVID-19 crisis to bypass democratic accountability, to override opposition, to accelerate their agenda and to impose it on the rest of humankind against our will in what he terms a “Great Reset.”
The WEF describes itself on its own website as “the global platform for public-private cooperation,” with admirers describing how it creates “partnerships between businessmen, politicians, intellectuals and other leaders of society to ‘define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda’.”
The “partnerships” which the WEF creates are aimed at replacing democracy with a global leadership of hand-picked and unelected individuals whose duty is not to serve the public, but to impose the rule of the 1% elite on that public with as little interference from the rest of us as possible.
How can Schwab and his fascist friends impose their favored society on the rest of us? One answer is relentless brainwashing propaganda churned out by the mass media and academia owned by the 1% elite—what they like to call a “narrative.”
Schwab: “The societal upheaval unleashed by COVID-19 will last for years, and possibly generations. Many things will change forever. We will be surprised by both the rapidity and unexpected nature of these changes. Radical changes of such consequence are coming that some pundits have referred to a ‘before coronavirus’ (BC) and ‘after coronavirus’ (AC) era.
Schwab: “A new world will emerge. Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never... A full return to ‘normal’ cannot be envisaged before a vaccine is available. The next hurdle is the political challenge of vaccinating enough people worldwide with a high enough compliance rate despite the rise of anti-vaxxers.”
Schwab: “Implanted devices (sensors, memory switches and circuits encoded in human gut bacteria) will likely help to communicate thoughts normally expressed verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts or moods by reading brain waves and other signals.”
Schwab: “Sooner than most anticipate, the work of professions as different as lawyers, financial analysts, doctors, journalists, accountants, insurance underwriters or librarians may be partly or completely automated... The technology is progressing so fast that Kristian Hammond, cofounder of Narrative Science, a company specializing in automated narrative generation, forecasts that by the mid-2020s, 90% of news could be generated by an algorithm, most of it without any kind of human intervention (apart from the design of the algorithm, of course).”
The technologies of the 4IR, rolled out via 5G, pose unprecedented threats to our freedom, as Schwab concedes: “The tools of the fourth industrial revolution enable new forms of surveillance and other means of control that run counter to healthy, open societies.”
Schwab knows that most people will not willingly go along with plans to destroy their lives and enslave them to a global technocratic, fascist system of exploitation, so giving them a say in the matter is simply not an option.
“I Am Done, I’ll Not Vote Again” – One Middle-American Mom Rages At ‘Real-Life Idiocracy’
All we Americans ever wanted was a little patch of land to raise a family, a job to pay the bills, and at least some illusion of freedom, and even that was too much for these human parasites. They want it all: mind, body and soul. Damn them. Damn them all.
Guest Post by OHMama
November 7, 2020
I was born at the end of Gen X and the beginning of the Millennial Generation, and grew up in a middle class town. Life was good. Our home was modest but birthdays and Christmas were always generous, we went on yearly vacations, had 2 cars, and there was enough money for me to take dance classes and art lessons and be in Girl Scouts.
My 1940s born Dad raised me to be patriotic and proud, to love the war bird airplanes of his era as much as he does, and to respect our flag and our country as a sacred thing. I grew up thinking that being an American was the greatest gift a person could have. I grew up thinking that our country was as strong, and honest and true as my Dad. I grew up thinking I was free.
As an adult, I have witnessed the world I grew up in fall to ruin. I have watched as our currency and our economy have been shamelessly corrupted beyond redemption. Since we’ve been married, my husband and I TWICE had our meager investment savings gutted by the market that we were told to invest in, now that pensions no longer exist and we working stiffs are on our own. We will be working until we die, because the Social Security we’ve been forced to pay into has also been robbed from under us.
I have watched as our elected officials enter Congress as ordinary folks and leaves as multi millionaires. I have watched my blue collar husband get up at an ungodly hour every day and come home with an aching back that we pray will hold out long enough to get him to old age in one piece. Outside of shoes, socks and underwear, almost everything my family wears was bought used. We’ve been on one vacation in 12 years.
We don’t have cell phones, or cable, or any sort of streaming services, just a landline and internet. We hardly ever eat out. Our house is 1400 square feet, no air conditioning. I cook from scratch, and I can and I garden and I raise chickens for eggs and meat and I moonlight selling things on Etsy. Still it is barely enough to pay the bills that go up every year while service quality and the longevity of goods goes down. What I just described is the life you can live on 60K a year without going into debt.
At last calculation, when you consider all of the federal, state and local taxes plus registration and user fees, Medicare and SS payroll taxes, almost a third of what my family earns is stolen by the govt each year. What’s left doesn’t go far, just enough to cover the basics and save a little for when the wolf howls at the door.
I watched as my family’s health insurance was gutted and destroyed. Our private market insurance, which we had to have because my husband’s employer is too small to have a group plan, was made illegal. We were left with the option of either buying an Obamacare plan with unaffordable deductibles and insanely ridiculous out of pocket maxes, or paying the very gov’t that destroyed our healthcare a fine for not buying the gov’t mandated plan that we cannot afford. We now have short term insurance that isn’t really insurance at all, and I live in fear of one of us getting injured or sick with anything I can’t fix from the medicine cabinet.
I have watched as education, which was already sketchy when I was a kid, became an all out joke of wholly unmathematical math, gold stars for all, and self-loathing anti-Americanism. My family has taken an enormous financial hit as I stay home to home school our child. At least she’ll be able to do old-fashioned math well enough to see how much they are screwing her. A silver lining to every cloud, I guess.
I’ve sat by and held my tongue as I was called deplorable and a bitter clinger and told that I didn’t build that. I’ve been called a racist and a xenophobe and a chump and even an “ugly folk.” I’ve been told that I have privilege, and that I have inherent bias because of my skin color, and that my beloved husband and father are part of a horrible patriarchy. Not one goddamn bit of that is true, but if I dare say anything about it, it will be used as evidence of my racism and white fragility.
Raised to be a Republican, I held my nose and voted for Bush, the Texas-talking blue blood from Connecticut who lied us into 2 wars and gave us the unpatriotic Patriot Act. I voted for McCain, the sociopathic neocon songbird “hero” that torpedoed the attempt to kill the Obamacare that’s killing my family financially. I held it again and voted for Romney, the vulture capitalist skunk that masquerades as a Republican while slithering over to the Democrat camp as often as they’ll tolerate his oily, loathsome presence.
And I voted for Trump, who, if he did nothing else, at least gave a resounding Bronx cheer to the richly deserving smug hypocrites of DC. Thank you for that Mr. President, on behalf of all of us nobodies. God bless you for it.
And now I have watched as people who hate me and mine and call for our destruction blatantly and openly stole the election and then gaslighted us and told us that it was honest and fair. I am watching as the GOP does NOTHING about it. They’re probably relieved that upstart Trump is gone so they can get back to their real jobs of lining their pockets and running interference for their corporate masters. I am watching as the media, in a manner that would make Stalin blush, is silencing anyone who dares question the legitimacy of this farce they call democracy. I know, it’s a republic, but I am so tired of explaining that to people I might as well give in and join them in ignorance.
I will not vote again; they’ve made it abundantly clear that my voice doesn’t matter. Whatever irrational, suicidal lunacy the nanny states thinks is best is what I’ll get. What it decided I need is a geriatric pedophile who shouldn’t be charged with anything more rigorous than choosing between tapioca and rice pudding at the old folks home, and a casting couch skank who rails against racism while being a descendant of slave owners.
I’m free to dismember a baby in my womb and kill it because “my body my choice”, but God help me if I won’t cover my face with a germ laden Linus-worthy security blanket or refuse to let them inject genetically altering chemicals into my body or my child’s. I can be doxed, fired, shunned and destroyed for daring to venture that there are only 2 genders as proven by DNA, but a disease with a 99+% survival rate for most humans is a deadly pandemic worth murdering an economy over. Because science. Idiocracy is real, and we are living it. Dr. Lexus would be an improvement over Fauci.
I am done. Don’t ask me to pledge to the flag, or salute the troops, or shoot fireworks on the 4th. It’s a sick, twisted, heartbreaking joke, this bloated, unrecognizable corpse of a republic that once was ours.
I am not alone. Not sure how things continue to function when millions of citizens no longer feel any loyalty to or from the society they live in.
I was raised to be a lady, and ladies don’t curse, but f~~~ these motherf~~~ers to hell and back for what they’ve done to me, and mine, and my country. All we Joe Blow Americans ever wanted was a little patch of land to raise a family, a job to pay the bills, and at least some illusion of freedom, and even that was too much for these human parasites. They want it all, mind, body and soul. Damn them. Damn them all.
Coronavirus COVID19 - is it like "The operation was called Dark Winter"?
Discussing the outcome of Dark Winter, Bryan Walsh noted "The
timing--just a few months before the 9/11 attack--was eerily prescient,
as if the organizers had foreseen how the threat of terrorism, including
bioterrorism, would come to consume the U.S. government and public in
the years to come." In addition to the possibility of massive civilian casualties,Dark
Winter outlined the possible breakdown in essential institutions,
resulting in a loss of confidence in government, followed by civil
disorder, and a violation of democratic processes by authorities
attempting to restore order. Shortages of vaccines and other drugs
affected the response available to contain the epidemic, as well as the
ability of political leaders to offer reassurance to the American
people. This led to great public anxiety and flight by people desperate to get
vaccinated, and it had a significant effect on the decisions taken by
the political leadership. In addition, Dark Winter revealed that a catastrophic biowarfare event
in the United States would lead to considerably reduced U.S. strategic
flexibility abroad. [Source]
When we lose our economic security, we also lose our freedom and are forced to survive any way we can. The subliminal, one-world religion is self-preservation — the survival instinct. It's basic to human nature. The Bible shows a coming world leader who will exploit this self-preservation instinct and will bring this religion to its logical conclusion. And, if possible, even some of the very elect will be deceived by this appeal to their pocketbook and personal security.
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.” (1 John 4:1 KJV)
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32 KJV)
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." (Ephesians 6:12 KJV)
This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
