April 23, 2015

Before He Was Murdered by Law Enforcement Employees, Boston Marathon Bombing Muslim Patsy, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Shouted, "We Didn't Do It," and His Brother, U.S. Citizen Dzhokhar, While Hiding in a Boat from the Government Manhunt, Wrote: "US Government is Killing Our Innocent Civilians"



After the bombings, the FBI stated that both of the marathon pressure-cooker bombs (two 6-quart, Fagor Elites, sold at Macy's) were in black vinyl backpacks. Dzhokhar's backpack was white, and Tamerlan's was dark gray with light gray trim.

Remarkably, the FBI, the attorneys for both sides, prosecution witnesses, and the press continue to ignore the fact that the backpack Dzhokhar carried at the marathon was white. This is all you need to prove that the Tsarnaevs were setup.





The truth is simple to understand unlike the convoluted mess of lies spread by the government.

It is a crime to make false statements to law enforcement personnel but it is legal for them to lie to you. Apparently is it not a crime for the prosecution to lie about the facts of a case to the press and during the trial, and for its witnesses to lie on the stand under oath. This is why you should never answer questions by government employees such as the police and FBI — you have the right to remain silent and you have the right to legitimate expectation of privacy (of your person, clothing, purse, luggage, vehicle, house, apartment, hotel room, and place of business, to name a few examples). Never talk to government "officials" without an attorney present. They will misconstrue what you say and fabricate, alter, hide, plant and destroy evidence to help the prosecution convict you, and judges will be biased against you and lenient with the prosecution, who work for the same system they do.
"It is far harder to promulgate a lie than to simply tell the truth."
The U.S. government has become like the brutal governments of other countries. For example, former Washington Post reporter David Satter argued convincingly in his 2003 book on Russia, Darkness at Dawn, that the Russian government had directed deadly and incomprehensible bombings of Russian apartment buildings in 1999 — which killed 300 people — to justify a new invasion of Chechnya and to speed Putin’s rise. In the Boston Marathon bombing case, the U.S. government fabricated, altered and withheld evidence, so don't put it past them to plant evidence and entrap associates of the Tsarnaev brothers and threaten them with imprisonment to get them to give false testimony to frame the Tsarnaevs' for the bombings.

The government has threatened the Tsarnaevs' friends with deportation or prosecution on trumped up charges if they don't cooperate in framing them. And others, such as Chinese national Dun "Danny" Meng, most certainly was threatened to give false testimomy. Meng, who was, and still is, in the U.S. on a work visa, testified for the prosecution. He was carjacked, but not by the Tsarnaevs. He was carjacked and robbed by the same two people responsible for the 7-11 robbery at gunpoint around 10 PM on April 18, 2013. They were on foot after robbing the 7-11. Fourteen minutes later and less than a mile away from the 7-11, they shot and killed a MIT police officer, who was in his cruiser. Then they carjacked Meng sometime after 10:30 PM and forced him to withdraw $800 from his bank account via an ATM at 11:19 PM. He made his escape around 12:19 AM, which is when his 911 call was placed.

The 911 dispatcher who took the call at 12:19 AM on April 19, 2013, immediately called Mercedes' GPS tracker system, and they gave him the location of the Mercedes, which was Dexter Street in Watertown. However, it wasn't until 30-40 minutes later, around 1:00 AM, that the Tsarvaevs were surrounded on Laurel Street by 100 law enforcement officers, including SWAT teams and bomb squad teams, from a multitude of agencies. Tamerlan's FBI confidential informant lured him and his brother to Laurel Street where they were ambushed by about a hundred law enforcement employees. They were under constant surveillance by the FBI, so the FBI knew exactly where they were when this was all going down and how to arrange for them to come to Watertown to meet Tamerlan's confidential informant.

So it took the FBI 30 minutes to work out their preliminary plan to frame the Tsarnaevs for the crimes committed starting at 10 PM on April 18, 2013, and to wrap it up dramatically with their capture in Watertown. The Tsarnaevs didn't have any guns or bombs. The shootout was all one-sided by LEOs. LEOs released to the press immediately, as the events were still unfolding in Watertown, that the Tsarnaevs were responsible for the 7-11 robbery, MIT murder, and Mercedes carjacking. However, 7-11 foiled their plans by announcing to the press that a 5' 11" Hispanic man who looked nothing like the Tsarnaevs was caught on surveillance, so the FBI had to drop that accusation. Over the months and years leading up to Dzhokhar's trial, the FBI fine-tuned its story and coerced fake testimony from the Tsarnaevs' associates by threatening deportation and imprisonment on false charges.

The brothers were wanted by the FBI and allegedly were planning to escape Boston with the $800 they allegedly stole from Meng after allegedly carjacking his brand new $50,000 Mercede. Yet the only things found in their Honda in Watertown were a crudely-assembled remote control transmitter, Tamerlan’s high school diploma, a Russian-language document featuring a bearded photo of Tamerlan, a laptop computer [this must have been Tamerlan's because Dzhokhar's was in his dorm room at UMass Dartmouth], an i-Pod, a cell phone, a thumb drive, a GPS device, chapstick, tire pressure gauges, a package of paper towels, an opened bottle of Gaterade, bandaids, and an ink pen [and a pair of planted gloves with MIT officer Collier's blood on them]. Also at the scene in Watertown were two backpacks: Tamerlan's backpack contained bullets leftover from their trip to a gun range a month earlier [they rented two guns because neither of them owned a gun], and Dzhokhar's backpack contained fireworks leftover from Spring Break at the end of March.

The Tsarnaves allegedly were fleeing to escape the FBI manhunt yet they didn't pack any clothing or personal items, not even toothbrushes. And in Tamerlan's wallet was only $19. What happened to the $800 they allegedly stole from Meng by withdrawing it from his checking account via an ATM [the timestamp on the withdrawal was 11:19 PM; an hour later, at 12:19 AM, Deng escaped]? There was no mention at trial if Dzhokhar had a wallet when captured and there was no explanation of the missing $800.

From the movie, "A Few Good Men:"
After Dawson and Downey's arrest, Santiago's room was inventoried. Four pairs of camouflage pants, three khaki shirts, boots. Four pairs of socks... Why hadn't Santiago packed? He was asleep at midnight, and you say he had a flight in six hours. Yet everything he owned was in his closet or his footlocker. For one day, you packed and made three calls. Santiago was leaving for the rest of his life. And he hadn't called a soul or packed a thing. Can you explain that?
Why didn't the FBI release footage from the dashboard cameras of the many cop cars on the scene in Watertown where Tamerlan was killed? Instead, Andrew Kitzenberg's out of focus, dark and long-distance iPhone snapshots from a third-story window of his home were submitted into evidence. Hundreds of media outlets published his photos and his dubious descriptions of what was depicted in the images.
"Each of these pictures on this page together with the description of them are individually licensed by Andrew Kitzenberg with the requirement of attribution to Andrew Ktizenberg and a reference to his company’s website www.getonhand.com under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. For anyone looking to purchase 8GB BOSTON STRONG USB Wristbands from GetOnHand.com (whose proceeds will go to the One Fund Boston, Inc. to help the victims who were most affected by the Boston Marathon bombing), go here."
Ktizenberg was called by the prosecution to testify because what he says supports the government's story. He doesn't have video, just blurry snapshots. Both Andrew Kitzenberg and FBI agent David Green were involved in falsely laying the blame on Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. How convenient that Green pulled out his smartphone just in time to catch Dzhokhar running away from the second blast site. According to the Las Vegas Sun, David Green clearly is implicated in framing the brothers:
“Seconds after the bombs exploded, David Green from Jacksonville, Florida, pulled out his smart-phone and took a photo of the chaos developing a couple hundred yards in front of him — the smoke, the people running in panic.”
In addition to not releasing any footage from cameras mounted to police vehicles, why didn't the FBI analyze the Garmin GPS found in the Tsarnaevs' Honda to confirm the brothers whereabouts that day. At trial, they presented a detailed analysis of their travels on March 6, 2013 using the Garmin GPS data, but didn't do the same for the most important days, April 15 through April 18, 2013, and all the days leading up to the bombings when they were allegedly making the bombs.

The Tsarnaev brothers arrived at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013 at 2:37:40 PM. Twelve minutes after they arrived, at 02:49:56 PM, the first bomb exploded (the second bomb exploded 12 seconds later, at 02:50:08 PM). According to the FBI, during the12 minutes that the brothers walked two blocks on Boylston Street before the bombs exploded, 70 images or videos of them were captured and submitted for analysis. This is not hard to believe since there was an FBI agent on the lookout for them at the corner of Bolyston and Gloucester Streets at the exact moment they arrived, another agent taking photos of them as they stood in front of the Back Bay Social Club, and another two agents at the Forum restaurant where Dzhokhar stopped and waited for his brother, who had passed Forum a few minutes before him and had continued up the street toward the finish line, where he waited to meet his FBI confidential informant or where his confidential informant told him to leave his backpack as part of the bomb drill. Additionally, there were other agents near the finish line, capturing images of Tamerlan standing in front of Lenscrafters.

Read More:

Who are the Real Boston Marathon Bombers? Part 1

Who are the Real Boston Marathon Bombers? Part 2



The Bombs Were Real - the Deaths and Injuries Were Real - and the Patsies Were Real as Well

Krystle Campbell, on the left in the photos below, was killed; her best friend, Karen Rand, lost the lower half of her left leg (she is pictured below being escorted from federal court on March 4, 2015).




http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/specials/boston_marathon_bombing_victim_list/



Go to tweettunnel.com and view @GlobeCullen's tweets on March 26 and 30, 2015 for testimony on the injuries to the three who died from their injuries.

Related:
According to a commenter at another website:

"Dzhokhar was shot before the televised 'capture' and not on Laurel street: that story is fictitious. A Henneberry neighbor recorded a video of 8-10 plain-clothed cops pulling up in front of Mr. Henneberry's, jumping out of their vehicles, running to the backyard, and opening fire on the boat, without saying a word. They hid and waited for around 45 minutes. Dzhokhar started to tear the plastic wrap on the boat to look out; the neighbor said she heard one cop whisper, "there's movement in the boat", and they opened fire on the boat again, waiting another 45 minutes. That is when the 9,000 law enforcement officers starting showing up on the scene."

Another commenter said:

"He wasn't throwing any bombs. It's all bullshit. Check out 'real time' blogs, and you will see that the 'timing' of events has been altered by authorities, from when they actually occurred. There are also a lot more players involved than is being divulged in the 'official' story."

13 comments:

  1. dwa8910Jun 6, 2013

    #229

    comment author avatar

    The United States killed my mother (9/11 attacks). For the record, she was US Military and Government. She told us 3 years before, that she was going to die in the attacks. I didn't believe her... and never expected to have to go through what I've gone through... but the fact remains, she told us it was going to happen... it was planned. It pains me to see a whole population of people unable to think for themselves... and worse, attack those that do have the courage to try and make sense of a ridiculous situation. Now I find myself, 12 years later, watching the same situation happen again to someone else's family. Anyone, and I mean anyone, who actually takes the time to look at this case, will see that its full of holes. It bothers me that not even one actual bit of evidence has been shared with the public... but even without it, they were still able to conduct a "witch hunt"; putting an entire city on lock down, killing one SUSPECT, while severely injuring another. When you cheer and clap for his rights to be taken away, you are actually cheering and clapping for the loss of all your own rights. This has happened to my family... along with thousands of others... sooner or later, its going to be your turn... perhaps only then will you understand what you are truly witnessing.

    http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/05/18771851-everythings-fine-boston-bomb-suspect-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-speaks-from-prison?lite

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dee from PanamaJun 27, 2013

    #244

    Since I will be 80 in December, it's probably very unlikely that I will be accused of a crime that would require a jury trial. Thank God! I wouldn't want most of you to be on a jury to decide my guilt or innocence. The fervor of hate is increasing more and more, due to the ignorance of most of the people who have wandered so far from the teachings of the Bible.

    All the hateful things being said about this young man's family has no basis in fact. I know many young men and women whose families are paying through the nose for their children's education. I have never seen any documentation that this family was on welfare, and there have been very few families from anywhere who were on public assistance, except the Southeast Asians that were promised asylum for their help during the useless Vietnam Fiasco. They were brought here and treated like dirt. Have any of you seen the actual documentation of the shoplifting charge?

    I don't understand why anyone would be so foolish as to post garbage that is nothing but parroting what you may have heard, unless you've confirmed it to be true. Even then, is it useful or just putting a feather in your cap?

    Why all the hate filled things being written about what you hope this guy will have to endure? The snide remarks about the virgins, is totally uncalled for. Does anyone know that the word 'Allah' is the Arabic word for God? This is not some other God such as the many gods in pagan religions. This is the God of creation, of Adam and Eve, of Noah and Moses etc. Every language has there words for a dog, a horse, a tree or a head of cabbage. In Spanish, God is Dios. Do you have a problem with that?

    Most of you need to get a life, calm down and think of what you might do to be a better person, and of course, stop being so filled with hate. This country has a long list of atrocities to other nations that make this pale in comparison. I'm not saying that it wasn't horrible.

    Every bad thing that is done to innocent people is a tragedy for them and their families, but the US has an unenviable record of that. How many innocents have suffered just in Iraq that were needless? The government knew fully well that they weren't going to find weapons of mass destruction there. Why didn't they leave after Saddam Hussein was killed, instead of inflicting all the more suffering on people who hadn't done anything to the US. It seems that this government has, for a long time appointed itself the "World Police' to the detriment of many other countries.

    http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/05/18771851-everythings-fine-boston-bomb-suspect-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-speaks-from-prison?lite

    ReplyDelete
  3. Don-1222194Jul 11, 2013

    #255

    Most of you posters make me sick for convicting someone without a trial. This bombing accusation has more holes in it than the Titanic, and you American suckers believe what the gov't and media feeds us! Just look at the article posted today about the "miraculous" "Wolverine" recovery of Jeff Baumann. Did any of you bother to look at the sequential photos of the moments after the bombing showing that he was a planted paraplegic, and the fake blood was spread around by the 'agents' working around him. The blood didn't even show up until long after the explosion. Yet many, many of you jump on this "he's the guy" thing (Tsarnaev), without even looking into this. Don't you even have the slightest suspicion that this thing was a setup to further draw the American people into a police state. The REAL bad guys have been trying to defeat this country for many decades, but now that they are working from 'within', they are tearing this Republic apart, and the vengeful hearts of many citizens are following this action right over the cliff.

    http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/05/18771851-everythings-fine-boston-bomb-suspect-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-speaks-from-prison?lite

    ReplyDelete
  4. speculator247 says:
    April 16, 2015 at 3:16 pm

    This all seems to be an exercise in mind control. If they can make the people believe a bomb exploded in the black backpack and that Dzhokhar was somehow responsible for that even though it’s clear that he only had a white/lt. gray backpack, that’s quite an accomplishment. They keep repeating nonsense about the Tsarnaev brothers being responsible when neither of them had a black backpack and there’s really no reason to believe they would have had anything to do with such a plan, let alone executing it. This is the most obvious, blatant set up I’ve ever seen. How anyone with any sense at all can believe a word of the official story is beyond me. The FBI insists that the people only look at their photos. Why? Because they want their official story firmly planted in the brains of the people. They don’t want the people to become “confused” by looking at real evidence and pictures. Incredibly obvious but it seems to be working so far. Please wake up people…before it’s too late!

    https://marathontrial.wordpress.com/2015/04/08/new-tsarnaev-prosecution-exhibit-shows-backpack-different-color-as-one-tsarnaev-carrying/

    ReplyDelete
  5. onetree

    Being asked or encouraged to be an FBI informant is one thing, but agreeing to be one is another. Of course it's possible and we know that these people can be very persuasive, but seems more likely that agreeing to what may have seemed like an innocent enough "favor" as a compromise by showing up at the marathon with backpacks and standing at a certain location in order to help out with the drill that was supposed to have been taking place. Another thing that bothers me is that I have not seen anything to show where Tamerlan was standing or what he was doing while Dzhokhar was standing next to the tree near the people who died. It may exist, but I have not seen it. It seems like it could been very important to Dzhokhar's defense, along with a thorough analysis of the tree which would have shown exactly where the blast had come from. Apparently, that very important tree has been removed to parts unknown.

    I would be very surprised if they let Dzhokhar speak during the sentencing phase. His silence serves more than one purpose. First, people are able to believe whatever they want to about him, they can assume that the prosecution's portrayal is correct, and they don't have to really understand the American kid with a Chechen background. And second, he might accidentally or on purpose say something that's not authorized by his keepers, especially while under prosecution's pressure, that would undermine the official story.

    But truly, the demonization of Tamerlan has been very offensive to me because he has been killed (under circumstances that are about as clear as mud) and cannot defend himself. Yet so many assumptions are made without any requirement to prove anything. And anyone who could provide really useful information, such as friends or family as well as witnesses who could dispute the official narrative, have been silenced or not invited or allowed to bring their information forward.

    And the receipts -- who keeps receipts like that? Was he saving them for reimbursement later by whoever had instructed him to purchase the items? And where did he get the money for those very expensive items as well as being able to spare $900 for his parents? Was money provided in advance by someone for the purchases? At the same time, I have no doubt that receipts can be faked. This is the FBI/DHS, etc., that we're talking about. So were these receipts created after the fact and placed where they were required to provide "proof" or "evidence" for the trial? Or did Tamerlan even purchase any backpacks? There's a picture of him leaving the store with a Target bag, but how do we know that bag contains backpacks if receipts and many other things can be faked? Perhaps he had gone to the store to purchase disposable diapers for his child.

    And, still, these are just small tips of the iceberg.

    http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/04/09/was-tamerlan-tsarnaev-an-fbi-informant-odds-say-its-possible/

    ReplyDelete
  6. There is certainly reason to doubt the veracity of government accusations – and if Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev really did use homemade bombs to kill and injure hundreds of Boston marathon spectators, there is good reason to suspect FBI and CIA involvement. Some years back, when Dzhokhar’s brother Tamerlan applied for a travel visa to visit relatives, Russian authorities reportedly asked the CIA to investigate the Muslim family, whose female members had recently started wearing hijab. The brothers had met with the FBI multiple times in the two years before the marathon bombing. Their mother Zubeida Tsarnaev, who was also reportedly on a government watchlist, said the FBI was closely scrutinizing her son’s online activity.

    It will be interesting to see if government prosecutor Carmen Ortiz will provide proof of Tsarnaevs’ criminal wrongdoings, or if she will resort to the cheap tactic of using “secret evidence” against the accused. Other than wild media stories about the manhunt that resulted in the cities of Boston, Cambridge and Watertown being shut down under martial law, all the public has to go on is surveillance camera footage showing Dzhokhar and his brother Tamerlan walking peacefully through the crowd at the Boston marathon wearing light backpacks.

    All we know for sure is that the police shot the brothers multiple times, killing Tamerlan while he was handcuffed in police custody, and severely wounding the unarmed Dzhokhar in the process of capturing him.

    Circulating on Twitter is a rumor stating that, according to the wife of a Boston police officer, “all the cops took turns beating the crap out of him… jumped on his chest and everything.”

    The 19 year old was aggressively interrogated for 18 hours and pressured to confess without a lawyer present after arriving at the hospital with multiple bullet wounds upon his arrest. It looks like someone broke his arm rather recently, as he appeared in court with a new cast on his arm. However, the defense was not permitted to discuss anything about police brutality.

    In an interesting twist of events, the proceedings of the secret hearing were illegally videotaped by someone standing behind the court camera and aired by a television station in Russia. Grainy cell phone photos from inside the courtroom showing the thin, young, pensive looking man seated next to his lawyer, were also circulated widely online via social media.

    The intense international interest in this court case is unique for a US “Muslim terrorist” prosecution in that there are so many vocal advocates insisting on his innocence and demanding a fair trial – balancing the huge number of unquestioningly pro-establishment American citizens ready for another public hanging of a Muslim.

    This time, the public wants to know what’s really going on. If the Boston marathon bombing was really simply carried out by two youths playing with homemade explosives, why is that being treated as a federal terrorism case rather than a local violent crime under the jurisdiction of Boston police?

    Did the Tsarnaevs do it? If yes, they probably did not act alone. It is important not to let this kid become a scapegoat to cover up for a deeper government conspiracy.

    http://karinfriedemann.blogspot.com/2013/07/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-faces-accusers.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. As the jury deliberates today, certainly Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's will be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. His "trial" has been a farce. His lawyer pled him guilty and did not mount a defense.

    After the Prosecution took 15 days, the "Defense" took six hours.

    Clearly, the prosecution and public defenders are in collusion to get the entire federal case -- with its many obvious falsehoods -- through the trial without any challenge. Even CNN remarked said the Defense was disappinting: "The defense presented just four witnesses who talked about the science of Internet searches and fingerprints. The sidebar conferences with the judge seemed to take almost as long as the testimony -- all of six hours. After the drama of the prosecution's case, the defense seemed dry and hard to follow."

    The indictment says both bombs were in black backpacks. There are video shots of Bolyston Street in front of the Forum Restaurant where the second bomb went off, showing the black backpack on the street 12 to 15 feet from the Green Mailbox next to where the explosion went off.

    On the first day after the explosion, Special Agent in Charge stated that black nylone remains were found -- nothing about a white backpack remains -- and later he read the forensic analysis conclusion that BOTH BOMBS were contained in "black nylon bags or backpacks.

    But Dzhokhar's backpack was white with thin black trim -- all photos of Dzhokhar with backpack confirm this. So how could FBI Special Agent Sarah De Lair appear hold up "pieces of the black and white backpack for the jury" and say, "the pieces were found near the Forum restaurant, where Tsarnaev planted and detonated a bomb." If Dzhokhar's white backpack with black trim was the one that had a bomb explode inside it, how come there is no picture of white backpack remains?

    The accused has been without friends in the court. The appointed public defenders have had one goal -- to protect the government's false accusations from exposure. Lead Prosecutor William D. Weinreb has submitted false evidence, knowing the public defenders would not challenge him.

    Dzhokhar has no "friends" to see him up close, to talk to him, to detect if his behavior is not being controlled through psycho-pharmacology. He is kept from other prisoners and is not allowed to speak to his family. Earlier he protested his innocence, yet he did not react when the public defender, Judy Clarke, said in her opening remarks, "He did it." Nor did he make any comments to defense counsel when the prosecution was making its case.

    This is a man who during the manhunt was shouting "We didn't do it." and "You've got the wrong ones."

    http://henrymakow.com/2015/04/Boston-Defendant-is-Drugged-Defenceless%20.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tsarnaev attorney: Video of accused placing bomb down "does not exist"
    03/02/2015

    Defense attorney David Bruck today told a federal court that what authorities have described as a central piece of the prosecution's evidence against his client "does not exist."

    In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings, public officials including the former Special Agent in Charge of the Boston FBI office Richard DesLauriers and the former governor of the state of Massachusetts told the public about a "chilling" video that all but proved the young Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's guilt. Speaking on NBC's Face the Nation, Governor Deval Patrick said the video shows Tsarnaev placing a backpack down and walking away, just before it explodes.

    "It does seem to be pretty clear that this suspect took the backpack off, put it down, did not react when the first explosion went off, and then moved away from the backpack in time for the second explosion," the two-term Massachusetts governor said. "It’s pretty clear about his involvement and pretty chilling, frankly."

    Later Governor Patrick disclosed that he had not seen the video.

    During jury selection in the Tsarnaev case, a potential juror told Judge O'Toole that she thought she could be fair and impartial, even though she couldn't get the image of Tsarnaev putting the bomb down out of her head. "The image of him putting the backpack behind that little boy...I do have this image in my mind that I can’t deny, to be perfectly honest," she told the court, describing what authorities have said is a video showing Tsarnaev leaving the backpack at the scene.

    In a February federal appeals court hearing on a defense motion to move the trial out of Boston, both a federal judge and a DOJ prosecutor referenced the public airing of the video showing Tsarnaev placing the backpack on the ground.

    The video has never been aired publicly.

    Now Tsarnaev's defense team has said in open court that video showing Tsarnaev placing a backpack down near the site of the explosions doesn't exist.

    NOTE: Bruck's comments don't mean there is no video evidence of Tsarnaev at the scene of the bombings. He was apparently saying that the video does not show what the government has said it shows, namely Tsarnaev placing the backpack down.

    UPDATE: The DOJ aired what appeared to be the long discussed video of Tsarnaev at the scene of the crime. According to reporters who watched the video alongside the jury in court, it does not clearly show Tsarnaev placing down a backpack.

    https://privacysos.org/node/1682

    ReplyDelete
  9. Justice denied: Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing [Excerpt]

    By Craig McKee

    Dzhokhar Tsarnaev never had a chance.

    While there is significant evidence supporting the accused Boston bomber’s innocence, none of it made it into his trial, which just concluded with guilty verdicts on all 30 counts against him. It seems that law enforcement, the media, and especially Tsarnaev’s own lawyer, Judy Clarke, were focused on suppressing any evidence that could have undermined the official story of the bombing. The truth has been covered up just as effectively as it was the day Lee Harvey Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby.

    Clarke insured Tsarnaev’s conviction when she opened the trial by admitting that he had carried out the bombing on April 15, 2013 with his brother, 26-year-old Tamerlan, who was killed in the aftermath. Clarke painted Tamerlan as the instigator in an apparent effort to spare Dzhokhar from execution, but that may happen anyway as the trial now enters the sentencing phase.

    Clarke is known for her ability to keep her clients off death row (including Unabomber Ted Kaczyinski; alleged 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui; and Jared Loughner, who was convicted of shooting Rep. Gabrielle Giffords), but given the weakness of the evidence against Tsarnaev, Clarke’s strategy amounted to throwing in the towel before the trial even started.

    But what about making the prosecution prove guilt? To say that Clarke could have created reasonable doubt if she had wanted to is an understatement. In this article, we’ll look at the evidence that should have been introduced at Tsarnaev’s trial but wasn’t (Keep in mind that Dzhokhar had claimed his innocence, which conflicted with the supposed confession he wrote on the inside of the boat where he was captured on April 19, four days after the bombing).

    Most have taken for granted from the beginning that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar did what they are accused of doing. But how many would be surprised to learn that the evidence against them depends on the statements of just two people – and these just happen to be the two most suspicious characters in this incredible story. While there is little direct evidence of guilt, there is plenty that points to the brothers being set up as patsies.

    Investigative reporter Russ Baker, who has written extensively about the case, explains in one of his articles just how thin the evidence is against the brothers is (Note that the “Danny” referred to below is the alleged carjacking victim, whose identity remained hidden until the trial. He has since been identified as Chinese immigrant Dun Meng.):

    “Without the murder of the MIT policeman, followed by the carjacking confession reported by Danny, we would have no solved crime, no evidence linking anyone to the horrific Boston Marathon bombing except some grainy video of two guys wearing backpacks in a sea of other backpack-wearers near the source of the explosion. The assumption many of us make that the Tsarnaevs planted those bombs is just that: an assumption that, in the absence of the reported confession, has no evidence behind it.”

    No evidence behind it.

    Read more at:
    https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-was-a-patsy-in-boston-bombing/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Boston Marathon bombing victims will split $61 million
    Washington Post
    June 29, 2013

    The charity fund established after the Boston Marathon bombings awarded $60.9 million Friday to victims of the attacks, including maximum payments of nearly $2.2 million each to two double amputees and the families of the four people slain.

    Fourteen other people who lost single limbs will receive nearly $1.2 million each. In all, 232 victims will receive payments, said Camille Biros, deputy administrator of the One Fund Boston, which has been collecting public donations for the victims.

    The statistics that accompany the payments provide the best accounting to date of the human impact of the April 15 attack, though some injured people might not have applied for compensation. Authorities have said that more than 260 people were hurt in the blasts.

    1. 69 people who were hospitalized for at least one night and 18 people who spent one or two nights in a medical facility will receive six-figure payouts of at least $125,000.

    2. 10 victims who spent 32 nights or more will receive payouts of up to $948,000 each.

    3. 143 people who were treated at hospitals but did not require admission will receive $8,000 each.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/boston-marathon-bombing-victims-will-split-61-million/2013/06/28/a8114090-e010-11e2-b2d4-ea6d8f477a01_story.html


    Sixteen people lost limbs when two home-made bombs packed with nails, pellet, springs and other metal shards were set off 12 seconds apart near the finish line of last year's marathon. Two people lost both legs.

    Many of these most seriously injured have endured numerous surgeries and struggled with infections, skin grafts and other complications. Some have suffered a condition called "heterotopic ossification," in which boney deposits develop in soft muscle tissue, a problem most often experienced by people wounded in combat. Some suffered such severe damage to their remaining legs that walking remains difficult.

    Probably because the bombs were placed on the ground, no one lost an arm in the attack. One woman seen at Spaulding lost a finger and is about to undergo her ninth surgery on the hand, said David Crandell, medical director of the amputee program at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital in Boston.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2014/03/18/nearly-a-year-after-boston-marathon-terrorist-attack-amputees-are-continuing-to-improve/


    To all of the hundreds of thousands of individuals and organizations who donated so generously to the One Fund Boston, we are eternally grateful. Your overwhelming outpouring of support has shown us that nothing can stop the kindness, courage, and unconditional love we have for one another. We could not be more grateful.

    In September 2014, the One Fund distributed more than $20 million in the form of cash gifts to individuals, as well as funding for the One Fund Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. This makes the total amount distributed by the One Fund more than $80 million.

    The One Fund has made the decision to stop accepting donations as of December 15, 2014. The One Fund Center programs will provide ongoing support to those who continue to suffer the invisible injuries of hearing loss, tinnitus, and mental health impacts.

    https://secure.onefundboston.org/

    ReplyDelete
  11. List of Boston Marathon bombing victims and their injuries:

    http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/specials/boston_marathon_bombing_victim_list/
    ReplyDelete

    Photos Of 17 Amputees Shown At Boston Marathon Bombing Trial

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/mikehayes/photos-of-17-amputees-shown-at-boston-marathon-bombing-trial#.qpbVPp4vA

    ReplyDelete
  12. Well done magiclougie some more info here....
    Any thoughts on how to tackle this corruption? A document of Amicus Curiae is needed. if you can help with that, It would be highly appreciated Thank you.
    Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is Innocent. He was set up by the Feds.
    https://sites.google.com/site/thefactsofthebbostonbombing/black-ops-did-it
    The Smoking Gun https://sites.google.com/site/thefactsofthebbostonbombing/black-ops-did-it/they-cut-the-2nd-backpack-out

    Please sign the Petition Thanks
    https://www.change.org/p/amnesty-international-icc-international-criminal-court-the-office-of-the-united-nations-high-commissioner-for-human-rights-ohchr-new-england-innocence-project-start-an-independent-investigation-and-re-trial-for-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-justice-for-all?just_created=true

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thank you Tom. Yes, Dzhokhar is innocent and he was setup by the feds. Thank you for the mention of Amicus Curiae, which I had never heard of. Maybe the ACLU or The Innocence Project would take on the case. I'll check out the petition and links you posted.

    ReplyDelete