Showing posts with label Rothschilds and the Fed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rothschilds and the Fed. Show all posts

January 22, 2017

Rothschild Family Wealth is Five Times That of World’s Top 8 Billionaires Combined

January 20, 2017

Waking Times - A recent report by Oxfam International highlights the dramatic rise in income equality by noting that the combined wealth of the world’s top 8 individual billionaires is more than the lower half of the world’s population, some 3.6 billion people. The intention of the report was to bring awareness to the unfairness and injustice inherent in our global economic system.
“It calls for a fundamental change in the way we manage our economies so that they work for all people, and not just a fortunate few.” [Oxfam]
Listed below are the 8 billionaires along with their estimated wealth, which combined equals $426.2 billion.

Bill Gates – $75 b
Amancio Ortega – $67 b
Warren Buffett – $60.8 b
Carlos Slim Helu – $50 b
Jeff Bezos – $45.2 b
Mark Zuckerberg – $44.6 b
Larry Ellison – $43.6 b
Michael Bllomberg – $40 b

Oxfam’s assertion is that world economies are mismanaged in favor of the wealthy, which is largely true, however, the report failed to hit the mark on this serious issue by not acknowledging the greatest problem with the world’s economy, which is the global central banking model of privately owned debt-based fiat currencies.

The current banking model is the product of hundreds of years of planned development, structuring, manipulation, force and trickery which began in earnest with Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who first established banking and finance houses in Germany in the 18th century.

The careful cultivation of his wealth with the assistance of his five sons allowed Rothschild to profit immensely during the French Revolution by providing financing and war materials to Austria, which in turn allowed the budding family empire to evolve into a multi-national organization, henceforth becoming a major financier of industry and war.
“Around that time, Rothschild sent his five sons to live in the capital cities of various European countries. His goal was to have each of his children establish a banking business in Frankfurt, Naples, Vienna, Paris, and London, and throughout the 1800s, they did. With Mayer Rothschild’s children spread across Europe, the Rothschilds became the first bank to transcend borders. Lending to governments to finance war operations for the past several centuries provided ample opportunity to accumulate bonds and shore up additional wealth in a range of different industries.” [Source]
Fast forward to 2016, the Rothschild family is a dynasty of unimaginable wealth which manages to somehow conceal it for the most part, never quite being publicly credited as the richest and most influential family in the world. By dividing their capital and holdings up amongst the many members of the family, including numerous descendants and heirs, occasionally a single member of the family will appear on a list of the world’s top individuals, however, the family as a whole represents the largest fortune ever known.
“Traditionally, the Rothschild fortune is invested in closely held corporations. Most family members are employed by these corporations directly or invested in operations that generate family wealth. The remarkable success of the family has largely been due to a strong interest in cooperation, being entrepreneurs and the practice of shrewd business principles.” [Source]
Investopedia estimates the family’s total wealth at over $2 trillion in assets and holdings, including some of the world’s oldest living corporations:
“…their holdings span a number of diverse industries, including financial services, real estate, mining, energy and even charitable work.There are a few Rothschild-owned financial institutions still operating in Europe, including N M Rothschild & Sons Ltd in the United Kingdom, and Edmond de Rothschild Group in Switzerland. The family also owns more than a dozen wineries in North America, Europe, South America, South Africa and Australia.” [Source]
At $2 trillion plus, the family’s reported wealth is closing in on five times as much as the combined wealth of the world’s top 8 individual billionaires, meaning that the Rothschild family alone controls more wealth than perhaps three-fourths or more of the world’s total population.

November 13, 2015

Flashback: Private Cash and Public Pension Funds Fuel Boom in Takeovers; Rothschild Starts $711 Million Private Equity Fund

Rothschild to Start $711M Private Equity Fund

September 3, 2009

The Deal - One of the most famous names in finance, Rothschild, is planning to raise a $711 million investment fund as it welcomes chairman David de Rothschild’s son to the firm.

Sources tell Bloomberg that the private bank’s investment vehicle will buy minority stakes in closely held companies, valued at €100 million to €500 million ($142 million to $711 million), with fundraising expected to be completed by year’s end. Marc-Olivier Laurent, Emmanuel Roth and Javed Khan, who came over from the Blackstone Group in June, will manage the new fund.

Also coming aboard to help with the fund is Alexandre de Rothschild, David de Rothschild’s son, entering the family business from European leveraged buyout shop Argan Capital.

Rothschild is marketing the new vehicle as fundraising for private equity is once again starting to pick up. Over the past two months, U.S. private equity firms put more than $11 billion under management; while other firms are targeting another $10 billion.

Rothschild Said to Start Fund; Chairman’s Son Joins

September 2, 2009

Bloomberg - Rothschild, the largest family-owned bank, plans to raise a 500 million-euro ($711 million) investment fund as chairman David de Rothschild’s son joins the firm, two people familiar with the plan said.

Alexandre de Rothschild, 29, moved to the family bank from Argan Capital, Bank of America Corp.’s former European private equity division, to work on the project, said the people, who declined to be identified before the fundraising is completed. Rothschild Managing Director Marc-Olivier Laurent, 57, will oversee the fund, the people said.

The two-century-old firm, which is run by 66-year-old David de Rothschild, plans to buy minority stakes in closely held companies after the pace of global mergers and acquisitions dropped 46 percent in the past year. The fund’s backers include Rothschild partners and clients. It will target companies valued at 100 million euros to 500 million euros, the people said.
“It’s normal for them to bring in family members to ensure succession,” said Anis Bouayad, founder of Paris-based advisory firm AB Conseils. “The bank has always found a way to promote its own, while also bringing outside talent to the top jobs.”
Javed Khan, who joined Rothschild from New York-based private equity firm Blackstone Group LP in June, and Emmanuel Roth, a former executive at investment firm Paris-Orleans, will also manage the fund, the people said. Rothschild plans to complete the fundraising before the end of the year, they said.

‘Family is Fine’
“In a business, the key is to have the best people,” David de Rothschild said in a 2005 interview, addressing the subject of succession. “The family is fine as long as they do a good job. If they don’t, it has to be someone else.”
David de Rothschild took managerial control of the U.K. side of the bank after his cousin Evelyn retired in 2004, cementing control of both the Paris and London businesses by a French Rothschild, a first for the family firm.

David’s younger brother, Edouard, stepped down in 2004 after helping to expand the French bank. Today, he oversees France Galop, the country’s horse-racing association. David’s cousin, Eric, is chairman of Rothschild’s asset-management and private-banking units and also runs the family’s Chateau Lafite vineyard.

Mayer Amschel, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, started out buying and selling old coins in a Frankfurt Jewish ghetto in the late 1700s and built an embryonic banking business by extending credit to clients.

In the early 1800s, he sent his five sons to establish bases in London, Paris, Naples and Vienna, in addition to Frankfurt.

His great-great-grandson, Guy de Rothschild, rebuilt the French business in the 1950s and 1960s after reclaiming the bank, which had been seized by the pro-Nazi Vichy regime. In 1981, the French bank was nationalized by Socialist President Francois Mitterrand. Two years later, David persuaded the French government to grant the Rothschilds a new banking license.

Private Cash Fuels Boom in Takeovers

Originally Published on November 21, 2006

Los Angeles Times - Elite private investors are buying up major companies at a record pace in a wave of deals that is raining riches on Wall Street, but also may be raising the risk of a financial bust.

November 7, 2015

The Illuminati’s Secret $20 Trillion Bank; the Estimated Value of the Rothschild Family’s Total Holdings is $500 Trillion

The Illuminati’s Secret 20 Trillion Dollar Bank

February 9, 2011

Zen Gardner - Of all the scams, the worldwide banking system is one of the most mind-boggling. Never mind the entire false premise of fiat money and the debt system, that vast amounts of this illusory “currency” get shifted every micro-second just begs deceit and piracy.

Trouble is, if you “buy into it” you’re already ensnared, and it’s either eat, or be eaten. That’s their design.

Ownership by Whom?

The estimated value of the Rothschild family’s total holdings is at 500 Trillion dollars. So what. The entire planet is supposedly “owned” by a very small percentage of people. So?

Can anyone “own” anything? Ownership is a temporary power trip for the unenlightened—everything always gets passed on. Like the temporary unit we all live in called our body, it’s an illusion that anyone can “live forever” physically, never mind truly “possess” anything if we look at things truthfully.

However…

That would be fine if it was just a matter of perception. Trouble is, these ultra-possessive creeps called the global elite or Illuminati impose their system of temporal power beliefs on the rest of us. Either we play the game their way, or we’re locked out of the playground and cut off from supplies by their hired thugs.

It’s a beautiful planet with lots of beautiful people, but the world “system” is very ugly and run by non-empathetic psychopaths.

But again, it’s all temporal.

Banking Scams Coming to Light

The recent economic manipulations have made a lot of things very obvious. While the MSMedia has tried to downplay or ignore these revelations, the globalist central bankster cartel is being exposed regularly.

While people are pounding on the obvious manipulation of and by the private Federal Reserve Bank hoax and Goldman Sachs and the like, there’s another part of that story few have noticed.

It’s a little known off-shoot of the FED called the DTCC aka “Cede and Co.”

What is the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation?

There is a busy little private company you probably never have heard about, but which you should. Its name is the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. See their website. Looks pretty boring. Some kind of financial service thing, with a positive slogan and out there to make a little business. You can even get a job there.

Now, go and take a look at their annual report. Starts with a nice little Flash presentation and has a nice message from the CEO. And take a look at the numbers. It turns out that this company holds 23 trillion dollars in assets, and had 917 trillion dollars worth of transactions in 2002 alone. That’s trillions, as in thousands of thousands of millions. 23,000,000,000,000 dollars in assets.

As it so turns out, it is not because DTCC has a nice website and says good things about saving their customers money that they are trusted with that kind of resources. Rather it is because they seem to have a monopoly on what they do. In brief, they process the vast majority of all stock transactions in the United States as well as for many other countries. And—and that’s the real interesting part—99% of all stocks in the U.S. appear to be legally owned by them.

How did this happen?

And why is this mega-monopolizer so hidden from public scrutiny? It turns out it’s part of the Federal Reserve Bank. Big surprise. These same owners and players mandated that all transactions have to go through their subsidiary. And not just go through it for all the profits and asset holding interest the transaction will bring, but they are given ownership of everyone’s assets in the process!

In the old days, when you owned stocks you would have the stock certificates lying in your safe. And if you needed to trade them, you needed to get them shipped off to a broker. Nowadays that would be considered very cumbersome, and it would be impractical to invest via computer or over the phone. So the shortcut was invented that the broker would hold your stocks instead of you. And in order for him to legally be able to trade them for you, the stocks were placed under their “street name.” I.e. they’re in the name of the brokerage, but they’re just holding them in trust and trading them for you. And you’re in reality the beneficiary rather than the owner.

Which is all fine and dandy if everything goes right. Now, it appears the rules were then changed so the brokers are not allowed any longer to put the stocks in their own name. Instead, what they typically do is to put the stocks into the name of “Cede and Company” or “Cede & Co” or some such variation. And the broker might tell you that it is just a fictitious name, and will explain why it is really more practical to do that than to put it in your name.

The problem with that is that it appears that Cede isn’t just some dummy name, but an actual corporation that DTCC controls. And, well, if you ask anybody about this, who actually knows about it, they will naturally tell you that it is all a formality. To serve you better, of course. And, well, maybe it is.

DTCC seems like a nice and friendly company. It is a private company, owned by the same people (major U.S. banks) who own the Federal Reserve Bank. And if they all stick to their job, and just keep the money and your stocks flowing smoothly, I’m sure that is all well and good. But if somebody at some point should decide otherwise, and there’s a national U.S. emergency and/or the U.S. government becomes unable to pay its debts, well, they might just not give you your stocks back. Because legally they own them. Something to think about. (source)

Sound impossible?

Here’s an explanation from another researcher:

October 18, 2015

Major Oil Find on Israeli-occupied Golan Heights in Syria Will Make Israel Self-sufficient for Many Years; U.S. Drilling Company in Golan Linked to Rothschilds, Cheney, Former CIA Director

Major oil find on Golan Heights which will never be returned to Syria

October 17, 2015

NextBigFuture - Large amounts of oil have been found on the Golan Heights. Estimates are that the amount of oil discovered will make Israel self sufficient for very many years to come.

Three drilling sites on the Golan have uncovered what is potentially billions of barrels of oil, enough to fulfill the Israeli market’s 270,000-barrel-per-day consumption for a very long time.

Israel was not going to give the Golan Heights back anyway but now that will clearly never happen.

Internationally recognized as Syrian territory, the Golan Heights has been occupied and administered by Israel since 1967. It was captured during the 1967 Six-Day War, establishing the Purple Line. On 19 June 1967, the Israeli cabinet voted to return the Golan to Syria in exchange for a peace agreement, although this was rejected after the Khartoum Resolution of September 1, 1967. In the aftermath of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israel agreed to return about 5% of the territory to Syrian civilian control. This part was incorporated into a demilitarised zone that runs along the ceasefire line and extends eastward. This strip is under the military control of UNDOF.

Israeli Prime Ministers Yitzhak Rabin, Ehud Barak, and Ehud Olmert each stated that they were willing to exchange the Golan for peace with Syria. However, in 2010, Israeli foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman told Syria to abandon its dreams of recovering the Golan Heights. Approximately 10% of Syrian Golan Druze have accepted Israeli citizenship. According to the CIA World Factbook, as of 2010, "there are 41 Israeli settlements and civilian land use sites in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.



Syria may never return to being a unified region again

The Institute for the study of war has all of the details on the Syria situation.

The oil find is a layer 350 meters thick. The layer is ten times larger than the average oil find worldwide.

Genie, the U.S. company that is doing the drilling-exploration in Golan, interestingly has people on its strategic advisory board:
  • Rupert Murdoch
  • Jacob Rothschild, the chairman of the Rothschild Foundation and the J Rothschild group of companies
  • ex-CIA director James Woolsey
  • Dick Cheney
  • Lawrence Summers, former president of Harvard University
  • Bill Richardson, former secretary of energy under Bill Clinton.

September 28, 2009

Private Cash and Public Pension Funds Fuel Boom in Takeovers; Rothschild to Start $711 Million Private Equity Fund

Rothschild to Start $711M Private Equity Fund

September 3, 2009

The Deal - One of the most famous names in finance, Rothschild, is planning to raise a $711 million investment fund as it welcomes chairman David de Rothschild’s son to the firm.

Sources tell Bloomberg that the private bank’s investment vehicle will buy minority stakes in closely held companies, valued at €100 million to €500 million ($142 million to $711 million), with fundraising expected to be completed by year’s end. Marc-Olivier Laurent, Emmanuel Roth and Javed Khan, who came over from the Blackstone Group in June, will manage the new fund.

Also coming aboard to help with the fund is Alexandre de Rothschild, David de Rothschild’s son, entering the family business from European leveraged buyout shop Argan Capital.

Rothschild is marketing the new vehicle as fundraising for private equity is once again starting to pick up. Over the past two months, U.S. private equity firms put more than $11 billion under management; while other firms are targeting another $10 billion.

Rothschild Said to Start Fund; Chairman’s Son Joins

September 2, 2009

Bloomberg - Rothschild, the largest family-owned bank, plans to raise a 500 million-euro ($711 million) investment fund as chairman David de Rothschild’s son joins the firm, two people familiar with the plan said.

Alexandre de Rothschild, 29, moved to the family bank from Argan Capital, Bank of America Corp.’s former European private equity division, to work on the project, said the people, who declined to be identified before the fundraising is completed. Rothschild Managing Director Marc-Olivier Laurent, 57, will oversee the fund, the people said.

The two-century-old firm, which is run by 66-year-old David de Rothschild, plans to buy minority stakes in closely held companies after the pace of global mergers and acquisitions dropped 46 percent in the past year. The fund’s backers include Rothschild partners and clients. It will target companies valued at 100 million euros to 500 million euros, the people said.
“It’s normal for them to bring in family members to ensure succession,” said Anis Bouayad, founder of Paris-based advisory firm AB Conseils. “The bank has always found a way to promote its own, while also bringing outside talent to the top jobs.”
Javed Khan, who joined Rothschild from New York-based private equity firm Blackstone Group LP in June, and Emmanuel Roth, a former executive at investment firm Paris-Orleans, will also manage the fund, the people said. Rothschild plans to complete the fundraising before the end of the year, they said.

‘Family is Fine’
“In a business, the key is to have the best people,” David de Rothschild said in a 2005 interview, addressing the subject of succession. “The family is fine as long as they do a good job. If they don’t, it has to be someone else.”
David de Rothschild took managerial control of the U.K. side of the bank after his cousin Evelyn retired in 2004, cementing control of both the Paris and London businesses by a French Rothschild, a first for the family firm.

David’s younger brother, Edouard, stepped down in 2004 after helping to expand the French bank. Today, he oversees France Galop, the country’s horse-racing association. David’s cousin, Eric, is chairman of Rothschild’s asset-management and private-banking units and also runs the family’s Chateau Lafite vineyard.

Mayer Amschel, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, started out buying and selling old coins in a Frankfurt Jewish ghetto in the late 1700s and built an embryonic banking business by extending credit to clients.

In the early 1800s, he sent his five sons to establish bases in London, Paris, Naples and Vienna, in addition to Frankfurt.

His great-great-grandson, Guy de Rothschild, rebuilt the French business in the 1950s and 1960s after reclaiming the bank, which had been seized by the pro-Nazi Vichy regime. In 1981, the French bank was nationalized by Socialist President Francois Mitterrand. Two years later, David persuaded the French government to grant the Rothschilds a new banking license.

Private Cash Fuels Boom in Takeovers

Originally Published on November 21, 2006

Los Angeles Times - Elite private investors are buying up major companies at a record pace in a wave of deals that is raining riches on Wall Street, but also may be raising the risk of a financial bust.

Investors led by Blackstone Group announced late Sunday the biggest takeover ever by a so-called private equity fund, a $36-billion deal to buy Equity Office Properties Trust, the largest U.S. owner of office buildings.

The proposed purchase follows announcements in recent months of buyouts that would put firms including radio giant Clear Channel Communications Inc., casino titan Harrah's Entertainment Inc., and food-service company Aramark Corp. in private hands, taking their shares off the stock market.

Takeovers are nothing new in American business, but historically the largest deals have involved companies whose shares are publicly traded buying other companies.

This year, the buyers behind the biggest deals are private equity funds -- run by generally secretive investment firms that raise money from pension funds, wealthy individuals, and other investors who are hungry for double-digit returns on their capital.
"It's obviously a boom," said C. Kevin Landry, a managing director at TA Associates, a Boston-based private equity firm. "You can raise as much money as you want" to do deals.
A private equity fund typically buys a company using mostly borrowed money, then seeks to improve the firm's bottom line through measures that may include refocusing the business or forcing cost cuts. The goal is to eventually sell the firm to another company, or take it public again, at a fat profit.

The buyout wave is enriching company shareholders because private equity investors usually pay more than a stock's current price to clinch a deal. That is helping to drive share prices higher overall, analysts say; the Dow Jones industrial average has been hitting record highs.

Yet the surge in buyouts this year is making some on Wall Street wonder whether they're witnessing a replay of other episodes when too many investors threw too much money in the same direction -- the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, for example, or a late-1980s company buyout wave led by corporate raiders. Both of those booms gave way to painful busts.
"It's sort of feeding on itself now," said Edward Yardeni, investment strategist at money management firm Oak Associates in Akron, Ohio. "You could make a pretty good case that a bubble is building in private equity, and that it will burst."
Private equity buyers have announced about 1,000 U.S. takeovers this year worth a record $356 billion, according to data tracker Thomson Financial. That dwarfs the $138 billion in such deals announced last year.

Private-fund deals still account for a minority of U.S. takeover activity. In all, the value of announced corporate takeovers this year exceeds $1.2 trillion; most of those are company-to-company deals. But the rising clout of private equity buyers shows in the sizes of the deals they're behind, experts say.

Five of the six top deals this year are private equity. That's never happened before," said Richard Peterson, an analyst at Thomson Financial in New York.

Most private equity firms aren't household names, but more may be on their way to that status as their corporate assets balloon. Big players include Blackstone, Bain Capital, Carlyle Group, Silver Lake Partners and Texas Pacific Group. One -- Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. -- became famous for its massive deals in the 1980s.

More than any other factor, the ascendance of private equity buyers over the last few years reflects the willingness of well-heeled investors to pony up mountains of cash in search of better returns than they can earn in stocks or bonds.
"There is tremendous liquidity in the market," said Brad Freeman, a 23-year buyout fund veteran whose Los Angeles-based firm, Freeman Spogli & Co., has a $1-billion private equity fund it's putting to work. "Deals are being done because they can be."
Private equity firms have raised an unprecedented $178 billion in new capital from investors this year, about 10 times what they raised in 1995, according to data firm Dealogic. The cash comes from investors such as the California Public Employees' Retirement System, or CalPERS, the nation's largest public pension fund.

CalPERS has about $6.3 billion invested in buyout funds, said Joncarlo Mark, a senior portfolio manager. The pension plan expects to earn an annual percentage return in the upper teens on that money, he said. By contrast, U.S. blue-chip stocks have generated a return of 11.4% a year over the last three years.
"There are a lot of investors out there looking for yield," said Josh Lerner, a finance professor at Harvard University.
But the success of buyout deals depends in large part on the purchased companies' ability to handle the debt loads they take on with their new owners.

With many private equity funds wielding huge war chests, competition to acquire companies has become fierce, said Stephen Presser, a partner at private equity firm Monomoy Capital Partners in New York.
"At the moment, private equity firms are paying almost historically high prices for businesses, and are depending on those businesses to continue to grow in order to pay down their debt," Presser said. "If the economy softens -- and someday it will -- those companies are going to have a tough time" managing their debt loads.
Some analysts also question whether companies that are targets of private equity buyers today can be substantially improved by their new owners.
"Companies already are under so much pressure to be lean and mean," Yardeni said. "It's not clear what they're [private equity owners] going to bring to the table to make these companies more profitable."
Still, corporate managers often are happy to attract private equity buyers. One reason is that top managers often participate as investors in buyouts, with the potential to reap hefty financial rewards if the company is eventually sold at a profit.

The costs and regulatory hassles of being a public company also are spurring corporate boards down the go-private road, said Scott Honour, a managing director at Gores Group, a private equity firm in Los Angeles.
"Companies are bogged down by Sarbanes-Oxley requirements," he said, referring to the law Congress passed in 2002 tightening regulation of public companies after the financial scandals at Enron Corp. and other firms.

"Boards are saying, 'Geez, we're better off being private,' " Honour said.
That worries the Bush administration. In a speech Monday, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. questioned whether the going-private trend might signal that U.S. regulation of shareholder-owned companies had become too severe, and was driving them out of the public market.

The deal wave also has attracted the attention of another branch of the government: The Justice Department reportedly is looking into the power wielded by private equity funds and whether the biggest players may be illegally colluding to increase their clout.