Climate Bills and a Green Economy
Global Warming Hysteria: UN “Process” Under Threat of Collapse
April 15, 2010Wesley J. Smith - Well, boo-hoo: The head of thepathetic UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is warning that unless we agree to turn over our freedom and economic futures to unelected UNbureaucrats, the “process” is doomed. From the story:
The United Nation process is in danger of collapsing unless countries are able to agree on the best way to stop global warming by the end of this year, the outgoing head of climate change negotiations has warned…Gee, how terrible it would be if we stopped spending millions treating these bureaucrats to sumptuous accomodations as they conspire, er, seek consensus, on the best way to sieze control over the world’s economies. Rather than being a negative, it seems to me that the breakdown of the UN “process” is not only to be wished, but deeply yearned.Mr de Boer, who will leave his post in June, said the world cannot afford another failure.
“Copenhagen was the last get-out-of-jail-free card, and we cannot afford another failure in Cancun,” he said. “I think if we see another failure in Cancun, that will cause a serious loss of confidence in the ability of this process to deliver.”
Obama Will Focus on Energy Bill after Bank Reform
April 16, 2010Reuters - President Barack Obama said on Friday his administration would shift its focus to climate and energy legislation after finishing financial regulatory reform, which he said would take a few more weeks.
"This is one of these foundational priorities from my perspective that has to be done soon," Obama said, referring to energy legislation at a meeting of chief executives and other officials who make up part of his outside economic advisory board.The House of Representatives passed a bill last year that would require the United States to reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases by 17 percent by 2020 compared to 2005 levels.
The Senate has not passed a similar measure but a bipartisan group of senators including Democrat John Kerry, Republican Lindsey Graham and independent Joe Lieberman are expected to produce a bill in the coming weeks.
"As has been noted, there's been a good bipartisan discussion taking place within the Senate around a mechanism that would put a prize on carbon," Obama said.Obama urged business leaders to voice their support for climate legislation to lawmakers.
"In terms of timing, financial regulatory reform will take several more weeks and then, you know, we'll probably be transitioning next to look at what can be done on the energy front."
Some environmentalists have questioned how big a priority Obama will make climate legislation on his long list of domestic policy priorities.
Senate Climate Bill, to be Unveiled April 26, Seen Raising Gasoline Prices
Industry and Senate sources have said the expected climate bill will contain a fee on transportation fuels that will be linked to the price of carbon in a program that caps emissions from power plants starting in 2012. Emissions from big manufacturers would be capped starting in 2016. - ReutersApril 25, 2010
Reuters - A long-awaited compromise bill to reduce U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases blamed for global warming will be unveiled by a group of senators on April 26, sources said on Thursday.
The legislative language to be sketched out in 11 days, according to government and environmental sources, is being drafted by Democratic Senator John Kerry, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and independent Senator Joseph Lieberman.
Backers of the environmental bill hope the unveiling will pave the way for the full Senate to debate and pass a measure in June or July if the compromise attracts enough support from a group of moderate Republicans and Democrats.
Republican Senator Judd Gregg told Reuters he was "committed to getting something that addresses our energy needs in a constructive and comprehensive way." He added he did not know yet whether he would support the bill being developed.
President Barack Obama has made climate change one of his top priorities and took steps recently to show Republicans he was serious, including expanding federal aid for building nuclear power facilities and allowing more domestic offshore oil drilling -- initiatives to be included in the Senate compromise.
The White House is also eager to show the rest of the world the United States is ready to take a leadership role on global warming, including to help kick-start stalled international efforts to tackle the problem.
Despite vocal climate change skeptics in the United States, leading scientific groups have been hoping the United States, the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases after China, would take action.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported on Thursday the world's combined land and ocean surface temperatures in March were the hottest on record.
Once the senators formally sketch out their bill, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid will decide the next steps in a year crowded with competing legislative priorities and congressional elections in November.
The bill could face stiff opposition from lawmakers in states with economies heavily dependent on oil and coal.
Lou Hayden, a policy expert at the American Petroleum Institute, said his group would not support the bill unless it went through an economic analysis by the Energy Information Administration, an independent arm of the Energy Department.
The bill is already slated to be analyzed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Congressional Budget Office, which could take more than a month.
BILL MIGHT END STATE/REGIONAL CARBON TRADE PROGRAMS
Kerry, Lieberman and Graham have been working for months on a global warming compromise significantly different from a measure passed last year by the House of Representatives and a bill approved by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. It also takes many elements from those bills.
Like the House-passed bill and Obama administration policy, it would set a target of 17 percent reductions in smokestack emissions of carbon dioxide by 2020, from 2005 levels.
Point Carbon, an energy markets consulting service, estimated the anticipated Senate bill would result in U.S. gasoline prices rising an average of 27 cents a gallon from 2013 to 2020. The bill is expected to contain a fee on motor fuels.
On Wednesday, a Senate source told Reuters the legislation would prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating carbon dioxide emissions. It would also end state and regional carbon-trading programs, such as the one several Northeastern states participate in, to be replaced by a national carbon reduction policy.
The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, with 10 participating states from Vermont to Maryland, has raised over $582 million for state efficiency and climate programs, said Environment Northeast, a Boston research group. Peter Shattuck, a carbon markets policy analyst there, said shutting the program could create concerns among the states over lost revenues.
A group of nine senators, mostly from Midwestern manufacturing states, urged Kerry, Graham and Lieberman in a letter on Thursday to take into account jobs in their states.
"Without such a plan, we are concerned that the legislation will ultimately be unsuccessful," Ohio Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown and others wrote.
I'm glad you pointed out that both the House and Senate Climate bills would sets targets of ONLY 17 percent reductions in smokestack emissions of carbon dioxide by 2020, from 2005 levels.
ReplyDeleteIn actuality, under these bill, CO2 emissions would be reduced by about 4 percent from 1990 levels, the baseline agreed to at Kyoto in 1998.
Talk about moving the goalposts!
With the notable exception of Canada, proposed US climate legislation would far short of the target set by the other nations that signed the Kyoto Accord.
Canada did sign, but under the Harper government is openly violating the law. The US did not sign, and therefore is simply ignoring world law.