Chemtrails and Atmospheric Geo-engineering

Get This DVD to Your State Legislator

January 14, 2011

Devvy Kidd - For the past ten years, the issue of aerosol spraying has remained in the spotlight, mostly on the Internet. Here and there one sees a bit of coverage on a local news channel, but for the most part, it has not risen to the level of concern that it should with the American people.

Those beautiful blue skies that disappear with the constant criss crossing of white gunk is no accident. It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s real and deadly to humans and our environment, but what exactly is “it”?

This is one of those issues that takes an enormous amount of time to research. Where do you go for accurate information? Cliff Carnicom was one of the early pioneers exposing the issue of chemical spaying of our skies. Over the years, like almost two million others, I have spent a great deal of time reading the documentation on his web site. Six, seven years ago, I met Rosalind Peterson to look at her research. It was scary and based on hard facts, not speculation. By hard facts, I mean water tables, documented destruction of crops and trees. Eventually, I was able to obtain an appointment for us with my state rep out in Sacramento; you can read about it in link three below.

As with so many other issues on the Internet, aerosol spraying has been fodder for wackos making all kinds of wild accusations. I think a lot of it is planted to confuse people and make the serious researchers look like nut cases. There are individuals who believe the chemtrails caused by all this geoengineering is nothing but a hoax:

How They Came to Embrace the Big Lie
Carl F. Worden
December 20, 2009

“When the first reports of so-called ‘Chemtrails’ hit the Internet crowd ten years ago, I knew it was a very well-thought-out hoax, but I didn’t know why it was being so heavily promulgated, and who stood to benefit from it. After all, a sizable number of people had obviously spent a great deal of time and effort to promote that absurdity, and then I noticed their e-mail addresses: Too many of those addresses ended with ‘.edu’, telling me they were hatched from individuals directly connected with institutions of higher learning.

“It appears the Chemtrail hoax was an elaborate, college-based experiment to see what average individuals would believe en masse, even if there was no solid chain of evidence to support the theory — which is all it ever was.”

When you look at Cliff’s web site and Rosalind’s (California SkyWatch.com and Agriculture Defense Coalition), you will see this is serious stuff and not a hoax. I know Rosalind has spent thousands of unpaid hours doing her research because she cares about people and the environment. She also has the credentials to be taken seriously. Rosalind isn’t alone. There are many fine groups out there doing a superb job of trying to educate their fellow Americans on this issue. But, without the help of national media and major cable “news” networks (which hasn’t and won’t happen because they’re useful idiots) we can’t reach everyone.

Rosalind points out on her ADC web site:

“The Agriculture Defense Coalition is dedicated to protecting agriculture, our water supplies, trees, and pollinators from a wide variety of experimental weather modification and atmospheric testing programs and experiments.

“These experimental programs will cause a decline in agriculture crop production, exacerbate declines in tree health, and add toxic chemicals to our water supplies and soils. Just the use of salt particles to make clouds brighter will salt up drinking water in watersheds and cause increases in salt in drinking and agriculture water supplies. The continued use of salt particles in clouds will make productive crop producing soils unusable for agriculture and change fresh water to salt water. The results will be long-lasting and will affect trees, birds, mammals, fish, watersheds, pollinators, crop production, rivers and streams.

“Toxic chemicals used in experimental atmospheric testing programs by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and NASA are already showing up in drinking water samples across the United States. The California State Department of Heath, Drinking Water Division in Sacramento, CA, is the repository for all public drinking water tests results required by the State of California and the EPA. These tests showing increasing (spikes), levels of toxic chemicals used in atmospheric tests. (For more information on these tests check the website by chemical name or go to the NASA Section or the U.S. Navy Section which list some of these experiments.)

“In the United States anyone may modify or mitigate your weather or climate without your consent. Any government agency, the military, state, county, city, private corporation, weather modification company or individual can modify your weather at any time. No public notification is required other than to report these programs to the United States Interior Department, NOAA. However, it has been learned that many programs are not reported to NOAA (National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration).

“U.S. Senate Bill S601 (initiated by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison), could be passed by the U.S. Senate at any time. This bill funds experimental weather mitigation and modification programs, does not require congressional oversight, sets up a board of directors who essentially may take bribes and be in office for years, does not have public oversight, public notification or public consent requirements. This bill expands experimental weather modification and mitigation programs in the United States. (For more information on this topic and a listing of current and ongoing Weather Modification Programs from NOAA, check the Weather Modification Section of this website.)

“Upper atmospheric testing continues without public oversight or consent and with little, if any, public notification. Now Global Geoengineering Plans to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reach the Earth (Solar Radiation Management), are beginning to be planned for our future. The use of toxic chemicals and other upper atmospheric particle releases are planned. There have been three hearings by the U.S. House of Representatives Science & Technology Committee since November 5, 2009. Testimony has only been from those, for the most part, promoting Geoengineering. (For more information about the negative consequences of these experiments, check the Geoengineering Section of this website.)”

On Rosalind’s Agriculture Defense Coalition website are two sections: (1) Geoengineering and (2) Weather Modification. They are not hoaxes or conspiracy theories, but actual programs that have been underway by various agencies and the military of this government for decades. The proof is in the documents if you take the time to read them.

Since we will get no help from the fake journalists who work for the MSM (including networks like FOX), how do we get credible information and documentation to lawmakers? Not the Outlaw Congress – they are the ones who have allowed this disaster to continue with major funding. While there might be a few in Congress, like Ron Paul or socialist Dennis Kucinich, who would like to see this investigated, it should be obvious by now that the Outlaw Congress doesn’t give a tinker’s damn what you and I want; just remember the vote several weeks ago on the phony Food and Safety Modernization Act. No, we have to reach out by the hundreds of thousands to our state houses.

State legislators need to understand they are also being used as guinea pigs endangering their health as well as their children. Citizens have been after their state legislators for years, but it takes numbers and persistence. But how do you get a hundred hours of research to your rep and senator? A new DVD is out now that does an outstanding job in bringing forth the truth: What In The World Are They Spraying? This is a full length documentary featuring G. Edward Griffin, highly respected researcher and author of Creature from Jekyll Island, World Without Cancer, The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the UN and many more publications. A short description about the documentary:

“By now everyone has seen crisscrossing streaks of white clouds trailing behind jet aircraft, stretching from horizon to horizon, eventually turning the sky into a murky haze. Our innate intelligence tells us these are not mere vapor trails from jet engines, but no one yet has probed the questions: WHO is doing this and WHY. With the release of this video, all of that has changed. Here is the story of a rapidly developing industry called Geoengineering, driven by scientists, corporations, and governments intent on changing global climate, controlling the weather, and altering the chemical composition of soil and water – all supposedly for the betterment of mankind. Although officials insist that these programs are only in the discussion phase, evidence is abundant that they have been underway since about 1990 – and the effect has been devastating to crops, wildlife, and human health. We are being sprayed with toxic substances without our consent and, to add insult to injury, they are lying to us about it.”

I urge you to order this DVD. Watch it and then send it to your state representative. Many folks don’t know, but state legislators are buried early on with legislation and business inside the capitols. So many have very short sessions, like here in Texas and Montana. Only a few months and then gone until 2013. (This is the 2011 session schedule for all 50 states). The longer the spraying and fooling with mother nature goes on, the worse it will get for us, our food supply and the environment.

State Lawmakers have a right to know what is being done to the skies over their state affecting the health of humans, killing crops, trees and seriously damaging the environment. Just send a short snail mail letter asking your state rep to watch the DVD. You are making this request because there is too much credible documentation about Geoengineering and the spraying of our skies to ignore and none of it is good for humans or the environment. Today I am sending a letter and my copy of the DVD to my newly elected state rep in Austin.

Equally important: Wait ten days after you mail it and follow up with phone calls. When you call, tell the staffer you sent the DVD and want to know feedback from your rep or senator. If they are vague, write another short letter (not email – a snail mail letter takes up space on their desk) letting your rep/senator know you called and have not received an acceptable answer. If you live close to your state capitol, stop in with two or three people and follow up. This is critical to getting their attention. For the life of me, I cannot understand why more state legislators are not taking this serious issue to the front burner. A decade ago, Jodi Waters stormed the State Capitol in Sacramento over the poisonous MTBE in gasoline. She made it a huge issue and beat the EPA and oil companies. It sure as heck wasn’t easy, but it we can stop this dangerous spraying of our skies by getting this DVD to our state legislators and following up until it becomes an issue.

To order this critically important documentary, click here.

In the videos above and below, a U.S. Air Force chemical-dispersing C-130 Hercules aircraft from the 910th Airlift Wing drops an oil-dispersing chemical (Corexit) into the Gulf of Mexico as part of the Deepwater Horizon Response effort May 5, 2010. Members of the 910th Airlift Wing were in Mississippi to assist with response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The 910th AW specializes in aerial spray and is the Department of Defense's only large-area fixed-wing aerial spray unit. (Source)

On May 19, 2010, the EPA told BP that it had 24 hours to choose a less toxic form of chemical dispersant and must apply the new form of dispersant within 72 hours of submitting the list of alternatives; however, BP continued spraying Corexit. A Lockheed Martin July newsletter stated that "Lockheed Martin aircraft [see next post], including C-130s and P-3s, have been deployed to the Gulf region by the Air Force, Coast Guard and other government customers to perform a variety of tasks, such as monitoring, mapping and dispersant spraying." (Source)

So one federal agency, the EPA, said one thing while another federal entity, the U.S. Air Force, did the opposite and continued to help BP, a foreign corporation, spray the highly toxic dispersant. This is government corruption and treason.