World Banker Makes Stunning Confession
Treasury Secretary Geithner Joins Council on Foreign Relations as Corporate Media Continues Globalist Coverup
“The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established.”February 7, 2013
theintelhub.com - Former U.S. Treasury Secretary and one of the architects of the bailouts that gave hundreds of billions of dollars to the big banks (including foreign-owned banks) Timothy Geithner has rejoined the globalist Council on Foreign Relations.
In a move that should have been seen a mile away, the CFR has brought their puppet Geithner onboard as a “distinguished fellow,” which apparently happens after you have worked for the big banks and the idea of a world government long enough to distinguish yourself among the globalists that occupy this organization.
In a post on the councils official website, president and noted globalist Richard N. Haass let us all know how thrilled the CFR is to have Tim back on the team.
“We are thrilled to welcome Tim back to the Council on Foreign Relations,” said CFR President Richard N. Haass. “Both at Treasury and at the New York Federal Reserve, Tim was a tireless, creative, and responsible custodian of the public trust.His coming to CFR only strengthens our capacity to produce thoughtful analysis of issues at the intersection of economic, political, and strategic developments.”
The post also made it clear that Geithner was very instrumental in the Obama Administration, overseeing the bailout and supposed reforms to the financial system. (which only made it easier for the biggest globalist controlled banks to reign rough-shot over the world)
As President Obama’s treasury secretary, Geithner played a central role in formulating U.S. domestic and international economic policy for the past four years.
He was a principal architect of the president’s strategy to avert economic collapse and to reform the financial system, while also tackling a broad set of international economic challenges. He served in this position from January 26, 2009 through January 25, 2013.Clearly the Council on Foreign Relations has an extreme amount of power within the United States. (and through connected round table groups throughout the world)
A group this powerful must be covered by the mainstream media on a daily basis right?
Sadly, this couldn’t be further from the truth, with the corporate controlled media worshiping the group and using psychological manipulation tactics to convince the American people that they are just a bunch of old guys with little to no real power.
MSNBC: “I Love the CFR”
A perfect example of the corporate medias CFR psyop occurred this morning during a segment on MSNBC’s Morning Joe when a guest from Politico revealed (a few hours before the CFR itself announced it) that Geithner was joining the group.
After being told the news, the hosts, including the daughter of globalist godfather Zibgniew Brzezinski, can be heard jumping with joy and then immediately attempting to downplay the CFR by making fun of those who have spoken out against the organizations stated goals which include the loss of US sovereignty in favor of a one world order.
After making a joke about the CFR presidents eating habits as if he really doesn’t do anything important, the hosts went on to not only shill for the group but to reveal their absolute love for the globalist organization.
“People always tell me oh the CFR, one world government, international conspiracy…
Its like I’ve been over there man, they can’t even get my sandwich order right, there is no international plot.”
“Its a lovely place.”
“I love the CFR!”If anything, the above mentioned segment on MSNBC was at least transparent, with the hosts openly worshiping the group and, in turn, letting the American people know who they actually work for.
“I do too.”
Real Truth about the Council on Foreign Relations
Throughout the years many prominent people have exposed the CFR for what they really are, including Professor of History at Georgetown University and former mentor to Bill Clinton, Carol Quigley.
“The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established.”Rear Admiral Chester Ward:
“The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereingty of the national independence of the United States.
A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government.”Dan Smoot, former member of the FBI headquarters staff:
“The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of it.”Congressmen John R. Rarick:
“The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system.
Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities.Famed Arizona Senator and Presidential Candidate Barry Goldwater: (who has multiple schools and organizations named after him within Arizona)
“The CFR is the establishment.
Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship.”
With No Apologies
- The outspoken political memoirs of America’s conservative conscience
- by United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater
- 1979
p. 126
In 1951 and 1952 the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee under the chairmanship of Pat McCarran (D-Nev), conducted a lengthy investigation into the activities of the Institute of Pacific Relations. The establishment of a communist government in China had destroyed American prestige throughout Asia.
The committee concluded that the American policy decisions which helped establish the communist control of China were made by IPR officials who were traitors or were under the influence of traitors whose allegiance lay in Moscow.
IPR was a creation of the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR is the American branch of a society which originated in England. Internationalist in viewpoint, the CFR, along with the Atlantic Union movement and the Atlantic Council of the United States, believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.
Professor Owen Lattimore, who headed the IPR, when it was so influential in determining American policy in the Far East, was termed a “conscious, articulate instrument of the Soviet international conspiracy.” Additionally, the committee named other highly placed members of the IPR – Lauchlin Curry, Alger Hiss, Joseph Barnes, Philip Jessup, and Harry Dexter White – as Soviet sympathizers or perhaps Soviet agents.
John Foster Dulles and his brother, Allen, were early members of the Council on Foreign Relations. When Dulles became Secretary of State, he implemented a policy of resistance to communist expansion, and his old friends at the CFR became his most severe critics.
The CFR argued that communism was changing – that the Russians felt threatened by the superior military power of the West – that its expansionist activities were really defensive. They said that once Russia caught up with the West in industrial and military power, the hostility would be modified. This is the root of the convergence theory supported by J. William Fulbright. Dulles maintained that communism, so long as it remains communism, does not change in any essential respect.
p. 290What a wonderful group to profess your love to live on air!
After World War I we could no longer remain isolationist. The changing times required us to become a participant in the world community of nations. Scolars turned their attention to foreign affairs.
What was to become the American Council on Foreign Relations was organized in Paris in 1919 under the sponsorship of Colonel E. M. House, who had exerted much power in the Wilson administration. This nongovernmental private grouping attracted a variety of individuals who considered themselves to be, or desired to become, specialists in foreign affairs.
In its September 1, 1961 issue, the Christian Science Monitor described the Council on Foreign Relations as “probably one of the most influential, semipublic organizations in the field of foreign policy.”
The Monitor said, “The CFR is composed of 1,400 of the most elite names in the world of government, labor, business, finance, communication, the foundations, and the academies. It is staffed almost every key position of every administration since that of FDR.”
In September 1939 two members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Hamilton Fish Armstrong and Walter H. Mallory, visited the U.S. State Department to offer the services of the council. They proposed to do research and make recommendations to the State Department without formal assignment or responsibility, particularly in four areas – security armaments, economic and financial problems, political problems, and territorial problems.
The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to finance the operation of this plan.From that day forward the Council on Foreign Relations has placed its members in policy-making positions with the federal government, not limited to the State Department.
Since 1944 every American Secretary of State, with the exception of James F. Byrnes, has been a member of the CFR. Almost without exception the members of the CFR are united by a congeniality of birth, economic status, and educational background.
A number of writers disturbed by the influential role this organization has played in determining foreign policy have concluded the Council on Foreign Relations and its members are an active part of the communist conspiracy for world domination.
To support this construction, they cite the fact that since the end of World War II the free world, and the United States in particular have suffered an unbroken string of defeats at the hands of world communism.
Their syllogistic argument goes something like this: The Council on Foreign Relations has dominated American foreign policy since 1945; all American policy decisions have resulted in losses to the communists; therefore, all members of the CFR are communist sympathizers.
Many of the policies advocated by the CFR have been damaging to the cause of freedom and particularly to the United States, but this is not because the members are communist or communist sympathizers. This explanation of our foreign policy reversals is too pat, too simplistic.
I believe the Council on Foreign Relations and its ancillary elitist groups are indifferent to communism. They have no ideological anchors. In their pursuit of a new world order they are prepared to deal without prejudice with a communist state, a socialist state, a democratic state, monarchy, oligarchy – it’s all the same to them.
Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years, has written, “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States.”
Their goal is to impose a benign stability on the quarreling family of nations through merger and consolidation. They see the elimination of national boundaries, the suppression of racial and ethnic loyalties as the most expeditious avenue to world peace.
Their rationale rests exclusively on materialsm. They believe economic competition is the root cause of international tension. This approach dismisses as insignificant the form of government or the political ideology expressed by that form.
It may be that if the CFR vision of the future could be realized, there would be a reduction in wars, a lessening of poverty, a more efficient utilization of the world’s resources.
To my mind, this would inevitably be accompanied by a loss in personal freedom of choice and the reestablishment of the restraints which provoked the American Revolution. Source
The above quotes are merely a small portion of the people who have exposed the true intentions of the CFR. To list them all would require dozens of pages but the information is out there and, with the advent of the internet, extremely easy to find.
As Geithner returns home after successfully playing the role of globalist puppet within the Obama Administration, it is paramount that the free media and everyday citizens throughout the country continue to speak out and fight against any and all plans for a one world government.
Prediction: With Geithner gone, in the days and weeks ahead we are sure to see at least one major appointment of another CFR member to a position of power by President Obama.p
