McCain and Other Republicans Call for U.S. Troops on the Ground in Iraq and Syria
January 27, 2015
The Fiscal Times - House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH)
and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) did not mince words
during their joint- appearance on “60 Minutes” Sunday night in berating
President Obama’s strategy for defeating ISIS and other terrorist
threats in the Middle East.
In a bruising
assessment of Obama’s State of the Union address last Tuesday, Boehner
complained to CBS’s Scott Pelley, “The president didn’t spend but a few
seconds talking about the terrorist threat that we as Americans face.
This problem is growing all over the world, and the president is trying
to act like it’s not there. It’s going to be a threat to our homeland if
we don’t address it in a bigger way,” he added, pointing to the recent
terrorist attacks in Paris and elsewhere.
McConnell
seconded Boehner’s contention that the U.S. and its allies will
ultimately fail unless they break out of the current Obama approach –
which amounts to strategic air strikes against ISIS forces in Iraq and
Syria and efforts to recruit and train friendly “moderate” rebels in
Syria to take the fight directly to ISIS forces on the ground. The U.S.
currently has about 2,300 troops in Iraq, but they are primarily
providing security and advice to the Iraqi government while staying far
away from the fighting.
Obama
has vowed repeatedly that he will not send in more U.S. ground troops
to engage ISIS on the battlefield. GOP leaders say that is a misguided
approach that will simply embolden the jihadist terrorists to persist in
their rampage and killing across a major swath of Iraq and civil
war-torn Syria in a drive to establish a new Islamic Caliphate.
“As
John indicated, it will require boots on the ground,” McConnell said.
“The question is whose boots? I think it’d be very foolish mistake for
us to say in advance what we won’t do. Nobody’s advocating a use of
American ground troops there at this point. But why in the world would
we want to send a message to our enemies what we will or won’t do in the
future?”
Few
question that the U.S. effort to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIS
got off to a rocky start, and the president has cautioned that it may
take years for the U.S. and its dozens of allies to achieve their goal.
More recently, however, the U.S. military has made some important gains
by altering its tactics to first support Iraqi efforts to dislodge ISIS
from strongholds in western and northern Iraq, while using air strikes
as a holding action in Syria.
The
new strategy seems to be paying off as Iraqi forces with U.S. and
allied backing have retaken much of the territory ISIS had seized in
Iraq.
The Fiscal Times reported last week that
ISIS suffered serious setbacks
and lost its momentum in Iraq since the start of the U.S. air campaign
last year. U.S. diplomatic officials said last week that the allied
effort has now killed more than 6,000 ISIS fighters – including half of
the top command.
Still,
ISIS controls the provincial capitals Mosul and Tikrit in Iraq as well
as the city of Fallujah west of Baghdad. And GOP leaders are highly
skeptical that the overall U.S. approach will be adequate to drive out
or destroy ISIS forces, as they continue to attract new fighters from
around the globe.
Until
recently, Republicans have offered only sketch indications of how they
would prosecute the war if they were in charge. That has begun to
change, as Senate Armed Services Committee Chair John McCain – the chief
spokesperson for the Republicans on military affairs and strategy –has
aired his ideas in a series of interviews and television interviews.
In an appearance last weekend on the CBS News program
Face the Nation,
McCain offered a blistering critique of Obama’s handling of the crises
in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere, saying the president and his top
advisers have “lost touch with reality” – including the role being
played by Iran in fomenting terrorism throughout the Middle East.
“So
there is no strategy,” he said. “It is delusional for them to think
that what they're doing is succeeding. And we need more boots on the
ground. I know that is a tough thing to say and a tough thing for
Americans to swallow, but it doesn't mean the 82nd Airborne. It means
forward air controllers. It means Special Forces. It means intelligence
and it means other capabilities."
McCain,
the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, was a major supporter of
President George W. Bush’s troop surge during the first U.S. war in
Iraq. He contends that Obama’s withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq in
2011 created a power vacuum that paved the way for Islamic State
militants to take over much of the country in 2014.
The three key components of McCain’s approach are these:
- Expand
the U.S. force in Iraq from the current 2,300 troops to 10,000 to
assist Iraqis troops. Rather than keeping U.S. service members confined
to bases and headquarters, many of them would be dispatched to the front
lines to direct or call in air strikes and take other steps to assist
the Iraqis.
- Establish
safe zones or no-fly zones in neighboring Syria. McCain initially was
reacting to news reports last year that ISIS was attempting to assemble a
modest air force with pilots trained by Iraqi military defectors. While
that threat has yet to materialize, McCain and administration officials
have considered establishing a Syrian no-fly zone to protect civilians
from airstrikes by the Syrian government.
- Expand
aid and military assistance to moderate Syrian rebels to help them
fight back against ISIS and Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. As The Washington Post
noted, Assad appears to be buoyed by months of U.S. and allied air
strikes against ISIS that have taken enormous pressure off of him while
he continues to destroy rebel forces seeking to topple him.
McCain said it’s an outrage that the Obama administration has pulled
back and is no longer insisting that Assad step aside, although his
regime is responsible for the deaths of over 200,000 Syrian civilians.
“In
the Middle East, we have got to have boots on the ground,” McCain said
over the weekend. “We have got to have training capability. We can't
train young people in Syria and send them back into Syria to be
barrel-bombed by Bashar Assad. That is also immoral.”
No comments:
Post a Comment