March 12, 2016

Chicago Public School Teachers Threaten 'Ditch Day' on April 1st to Protest Pension Reform

How CPS students will lose if their teachers ditch class

"You know, like, look at it as an extra holiday, right? I mean, just look at it that way. That's the only thing I can tell them to make them feel better." - Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis, March 7, 2016
March 11, 2016

Chicago Tribune Editorial - Karen Lewis breezily tells parents not to worry if teachers ultimately decide to skip work on Friday, April 1. Even though it's scheduled as a school day. Even though students are expected to attend their classes.

Where will teachers be if not in classrooms? Union leaders haven't said. Will teachers be on the picket line? In the Loop for another of those raucous red-shirt rallies? Should children show up for school? What do working parents do?

Not sure yet, we'll get back to you, Lewis says about the union's "Shut It Down" event — billed on the CTU website as "a march and a day of direct action ..."

We hope teachers don't abandon their students to show their pique against Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Gov. Bruce Rauner and CPS leaders. If so, they would demonstrate a breathtakingly heedless disregard for the instruction that about 22,000 union members — they're educators, remember — provide to students.

Teachers should be making the most of every precious minute in the instructional day. There are only 178 of those days in a school year. They go fast. Children fall behind when they're not in class. They lose their momentum, their eagerness to learn.

Yet teachers and their union leaders could squander April 1 with little more than a shrug: School's out, kids. We're declaring our own furlough day ...

Students don't learn only in the classroom. They learn by watching adults. Their parents. Their teachers.
No matter what teachers try to teach, CPS students are learning about what matters most to many of the adults entrusted with their education.

If teachers walk, students would learn an acrid lesson about the teachers union's astonishing disrespect for the value of classroom instruction. Think about that.

Children would learn how a labor union, deep in contract negotiations, throws a tantrum because it won't accept a new pact that phases out a lavish 7 percent pension payment pickup the district can no longer afford. CPS still would be responsible for its employer contribution to the pensions. But it would stop paying most of the employee contribution.

Students would learn that when money and education are in play, some adults put education second to their real priority.

Remember: CPS is broke. CPS CEO Forrest Claypool declared three furlough days for teachers and administrators to make ends meet. On Wednesday, he told principals to pare back spending because the district is short of cash to finish the year. "In this fiscal crisis, please only fill jobs that are absolutely essential for students," CPS told principals.

Essential for students. CPS has its priorities straight.

Under state bargaining protocols, the teachers union can't yet legally strike. That day won't come until mid-May.

But what teachers can do, legally or not, is churlishly abandon their students on April 1.

No, it's not a holiday, as Lewis suggests.

It's a school day.

And what about all those single parents who work, who expect that their kids will be in class, who would have to scramble to find child care or just miss a day of work?

Sorry, parents, you won't count. Neither would your child's education. Teachers could abandon their students because they don't like those furlough days or CPS' last contract offer.


If contract talks break down, if teachers walk, they probably figure they'll have many parents on their side. But how would leaving thousands of parents in the lurch on Teacher Ditch Day generate sympathy for the teachers' cause? 

In 2011, Mayor Rahm Emanuel and CPS leaders battled the teachers union over adding precious time — 52 minutes for elementary schools, 46 minutes for high schools — to the instructional day. Back then, Chicago cheated students with one of the shortest school days in the U.S.

Those extra minutes pay off for children. In higher standardized test scores for many CPS students. In CPS' improving graduation rates.

Teachers know that an entire lost school day is irretrievable. So, will they be with their students on April 1?

We hope so. If not, teachers, good luck explaining your little tantrum to your students. Tell them why your protest is more important than their education.

2 comments:

  1. CHI Ed wrote:

    Just checking the city of Chicago spending site I see that Chicago spends $9,778 per student on "instructional" time vs. the state average of $7,419 and $15,120 per student on operational spending ( excluding debt repayment ( that has to be huge) vs. the state average of $12,521. So the total spending per student in CPS is almost 25k per year ( but obviously much higher as CPS excludes a number of items from spending. The tuition at Francis Parker ( one of the best , and most expensive exclusive schools in Chicago) is around 27-30k. Let's not even talk about performance. Yet the union sees a lack of spending as the problem? The problem is obvious, but politically untouchable. There are good teachers in CPS, but way too many bad ones, way too many politically connected do nothing administrators, too much gaming of the pay system with sick and vacation days and spiking salaries near the end of careers to increases pension payments and too many bad or non involved parents. The Union could at least acknowledge some of these, but they're all in on give me everything. Given that they have successfully passed a 30% property tax increase ( just to meet the next couple of funding payments), they may want to start to acknowledge some of the legal corruption they have been getting away with before those tax bills go into affect. It's one thing for an Alderman or State Rep to back the Union now, but quite another when a taxpayer has to skip work because Teachers walk out and the taxpayer has to pay his new tax bill. You think I'm kidding? Look what happened to the Machine when they couldn't clear snow. Madigan doesn't give a sh&t, he's 107 years old, but others will be tossed.

    DaveB9 wrote:

    Any teacher that doesn't show on April 1, dock him/her a day's pay. They call themselves professionals, but they act like hourly-rate employees. Treat them the way they act.

    Dwayne Hoover wrote:

    Ooooh ! how's it feel, having to pay toward your own pension. Will you show up to work on April 1, our will you screw the kids ?

    If the kids show up, but the teachers don't, who will be babysitting them ? Doesn't that put the children in harms way. Ah, who cares ! The kids don't pay union dues, and the teachers want their money. So, the children can go take a hike, right Karen.

    "Ok!! Nobody move. We've got your kids. Give us all your money and nobody gets hurt." - Boss Hog and her posse of pathetic union stooges, 3/11/16.
    Hanginlow wrote:

    Parents should stage a "Shut Them Up" Day of Action and go and protest these greedy teachers and tell them to shut up and get their overpaid buts back in the classroom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BillW75 wrote/;

    Can we now please stop buying into the myth that the union cares about educating students?

    The teachers certainly do. At least most. But they are being led by people who truly do not. VOTE THEM OUT!

    I heard that on their last "day of action" as they marched, the leaders were instructing the marchers to block traffic. Wanting maximum impact I guess - but does that actually help or hurt their cause?

    Does anyone understand exactly what the teachers want? Most assume it's to keep getting the free pension ride - but I hear that's not really true. That it's true stability of funding so they don't have to go through this every year or two.

    If so, why don't we hear that articulated from the union leaders? Oh wait, let's hear from the guy wearing the superhero (Flash) t-shirt from one of their news conferences. That guy looked so unprofessional I didn't listen to a word he said.

    Look teachers - it's time to vote these clowns out and get someone who cares about education and the working parents who don't view Teacher Ditch Day as a holiday but a major PITA.

    Dwayne Hoover wrote:

    Full Definition of churlish

    1 : of, resembling, or characteristic of a churl : vulgar

    2 : marked by a lack of civility or graciousness : surly

    3 : difficult to work with or deal with : intractable

    Congratulations Tribune editorial staff. You picked a wonderful word to describe the greed-crazed teachers.

    It isn't for the children ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Say it ain't so.

    ReplyDelete