Oil Spill in the Gulf

Alex Jones’s EndGame showed us that the plan was to depopulate regions and move people out of areas into compact cities. The plan, summarized in Agenda 21, is underway. This oil gusher is no hoax, but the plans to use it to implement Agenda 21 lets the criminal culprits off the hook. Don’t look for a mass evacuation because a percentage slow-kill death via cancer is underway here. - ScholarResource, The British Spillbillies and the Great Oil Spill Hoax of 2010, Infowars.com, August 22, 2010

The video provides a decent summary of the agenda behind the spill, but they could have used a better wording as I think using the word fake gives the wrong implications. I don’t think they were trying to imply that the spill didn’t happen, but rather there was an ulterior motive for it (carbon taxes) and that it was an inside job. As mentioned above in another post, one of the possible motives the video didn’t address was Agenda 21 and depopulation/relocation, but that’s too large of a topic to have included in such a short video. - Morgan_Le_Fay, The British Spillbillies and the Great Oil Spill Hoax of 2010, Infowars.com, August 22, 2010

Gulf Oil Spill: Meddling Scientists Keep Ruining It For BP

August 20, 2010

BNET - A team of scientists discovered an underwater oil plume some 22 miles long and 1 mile-wide, throwing a wrench in the ridiculous premise that the 4.1 million barrels of crude that spewed from BP’s well in the Gulf of Mexico — and wasn’t captured by ships — had vanished. Those damned meddling scientists are once again making life difficult for BP execs, who prefer the government’s more positive spin on the amount of oil left in the Gulf.

This isn’t some handful of rogue scientists, by the way. At least two other studies — from the University of Georgia and University of South Florida — also have revealed data that directly contradicts a recent government report on the amount of oil in the Gulf. Earlier this month, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a report that claimed 3/4 of the oil had dispersed — either naturally or by the liberal use of chemical dispersants.

Curiously, BP has stayed quiet throughout all of this, preferring to watch the federal government and independent scientists battle over the amount of oil in the Gulf. It’s a wickedly smart move on BP’s part that provides a glimpse into the company’s changing strategy.

In the first months after the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded and BP’s well began belching oil and gas, the company spent considerable time and resources trying to shape public perception. BP figured the more visible its clean up and containment efforts — shared via advertising and constant press conferences — the better off it would be. And that failed miserably, thanks to bumbling former CEO Tony Hayward.

BP has reduced its visibility in recent weeks, most notably after it stopped the stream of oil and gas. The company is now preparing to permanently seal the well. BP has finally realized that folks simply don’t trust a damned word it puts out there.

The moment BP starts backing up the federal government, that NOAA report, which claims the oil is rapidly dispersing, will lose even more credibility. NOAA’s report already is drawing considerable fire from lawmakers, notably from Energy and Environment subcommittee chair Rep. Ed Markey, who held a hearing Thursday on the spill and its impact on seafood safety. (Markey, by the way, was the only member present at the hearing). The debate has become even more muddled in the past 24 hours. After NOAA scientist Bill Lehr backed off the study Thursday, calling it preliminary, the agency’s chief Jane Lubchenco held a conference call last night defending the results. All of this confusion, of course, is great for BP. How can we hold BP responsible for damage if we can’t definitely determine how much oil is impacting the Gulf?

This report — or any study that shows the oil has vanished — is critical for BP and its bottom line. Lingering underwater oil could cause problems for marine life, either by the toxic impact on microscopic plants, the formation of dead zones or by physically coating animals. With every drop of oil left in the Gulf, BP’s liability grows because it is ultimately responsible for the clean up and restoration of the Gulf coast.

For complete coverage, see All Things BNET on BP’s Gulf of Mexico Spill

Editor's Note:

As pointed out by ScholarResource and Morgan_Le_Fay, the Gulf oil spill fits into the elite's agenda to move the population into mega cities and away from regions designated as 'wilderness areas' with highly restricted access.

http://globalslaves.blogspot.com/search/label/Agenda%2021%3A%20Master%20Plan%20for%20a%20NWO

This includes many areas of the Gulf Coast.

http://globalslaves.blogspot.com/search/label/Non-Human-Use%20Zones%20in%20America

The oil spill is also being used to push their unpopular carbon trading scheme through Congress.

http://www.lambslain.com/2010/08/climate-bills-and-green-economy-bp-gulf.html

As far as Bible prophecy goes, with this type of oil spill (often compared to an underwater volcano) it is easy to see how "the third part of the sea will become blood" and "the third part of the sea creatures will die" -- all it will take is for a number of deepwater oil rigs to explode and oil reserves under the sea to gush into the oceans. And if this type of event is followed by hurricanes/earthquakes/tsunamis, then it is also easy to see how "the third part of the ships will be destroyed."

http://inthecloudsofheaven.blogspot.com/