A Carbon Tax to Fund Global Government, Lower Our Standard of Living, and Control Our Lives, That's What the Paris Climate Deal is About

There's no 'world' rallying for 'climate'. Just the opposite. People have seen through this fraud and want nothing to do with it. The 'leaders' are after money and power and are trying to do so in the name of junk science. Yeah, they can save the planet, it'll just take more tax money.

They freely admit that they want to put a price on carbon emissions worldwide, which will essentially be a world tax on everything you consume. It is no more than a worldwide communism scheme. The one percent and their green minions will benefit the most and establish a one world government through taxes.

Global warming, Globalization, Global one world government, Global communism. MORE TOTALITARIAN GARBAGE.

C.S. Lewis said: "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

Groucho Marx said: "Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies."

IT IS ABOUT GLOBAL COMMUNISM, NOT CLIMATE CHANGE.

Ted Cruz has denied the existence of manmade climate change, despite the consensus among 97 percent of NASA climate scientists that evidence points toward manmade global warming. "You always have to be worried about something that is considered a so-called scientific theory that fits every scenario,” Cruz told CNN in February last of last year. “Climate change, as they have defined it, can never be disproved, because whether it gets hotter or whether it gets colder, whatever happens, they'll say, well, it's changing, so it proves our theory.”

Massive rallies for the climate, but violence in Paris

November 29, 2015

AFP - Hundreds of thousands of people rallied around the world Sunday on the eve of a Paris summit aimed at averting catastrophic climate change, but violent clashes in the French capital soured the show of people power.

The global protests, including an emotional linking of hands near the heart of this month's terror attacks in Paris, were aimed at building grassroots pressure for an historic deal at the UN talks to limit global warming.

As US President Brack Obama and other world leaders began flying into Paris for Monday's official opening, negotiators vowed at a preliminary session to honour the victims of the attacks by forging an ambitious deal.

"The best way to honour the memory of those who have fallen, those who are victims of barbaric attacks, is to carry out what we have committed to," the co-chair of the talks, Ahmed Djoghlaf, told participants at a vast conference centre in Le Bourget, on the northern outskirts of Paris.

Deep emotions and tensions from the November 13 attacks, in which Islamist militants killed 130 people in a series of gun and suicide bomb assaults, were evident across the City of Lights on Sunday.

French authorities cancelled two climate demonstrations because of security fears.

But in a show of defiance against the militants and determination to have their voices heard on climate change, thousands of people in Paris gathered to hold hands and link up in a two-kilometre (1.2-mile) human chain.

"Hear our voices! We are here!" they chanted.

Protesters left a 100-metre (300-foot) gap in the human chain outside the Bataclan concert hall, the site where gunmen killed 90 people, as a mark of respect to the victims.

Instead of marching, activists placed thousands of pairs of shoes -- weighing more than four tonnes according to organisers -- on Place de la Republique square.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon left a pair of running shoes, and Pope Francis sent shoes to be placed on his behalf.

But a band of anti-capitalist militants infiltrated the protests, leading to clashes with riot police in the late afternoon and the detention of more than 200 people.


Police fired teargas at protesters, who pelted them with bottles and candles in Place de la Republique and chanted: "State of emergency, police state", referring to the post-attack protest restrictions.

- 'Scandalous' behaviour -

French President Francois Hollande condemned the "scandalous" behaviour of the far-left activists.

"These disruptive elements have nothing to do with defenders of the environment," Hollande said at an EU-Turkey summit in Brussels.

Before flying out to Paris, Obama said world leaders would show their resolve to stand up to terrorism.

"It's an opportunity to stand in solidarity with our oldest ally, just two weeks removed from the barbaric attacks there, and reaffirm our commitment to protect our people and our way of life from terrorist threats," Obama said in a Facebook post before leaving Washington on Air Force One.

About 150 leaders, including China's Xi Jinping, India's Narendra Modi and Russia's Vladimir Putin, will attend the start of the UN conference that is tasked with reaching the first truly universal climate pact.

French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said nearly 1,000 people thought to pose security risks had been denied entry into France, which reimposed border controls on November 13 to protect the summit.

About 2,800 police and soldiers will secure the site of the November 30-December 11 conference, and 6,300 others will deploy in Paris.

- Dangerous warming -

The UN's weather body said this month the average global temperature for 2015 is set to rise one degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels, halfway towards the targeted UN ceiling.

Voluntary carbon-curbing pledges submitted by nations to bolster the Paris pact, even if fully adhered to, put Earth on track for warming of 2.7-3.5 degrees C, according to UN climate chief Christiana Figueres.

If concrete action is not taken soon, scientists warn of superstorms, drought and rising sea levels that will displace millions.

But this week's talks are set to see decades-long disputes between rich and poor nations flare again and potentially prevent an agreement.

Potential stumbling blocks range from finance for climate vulnerable and poor countries to scrutiny of commitments to curb greenhouse gases and even the legal status of the accord.

The last attempt to forge a global deal -- the ill-tempered 2009 Copenhagen summit -- foundered upon such divisions between rich and poor countries.

To pressure world leaders into putting aside their differences and forge an agreement, more than half a million people participated in global climate protests over the weekend, co-organiser Avaaz said.

"The charge from the streets for leaders to act on climate has been deafening, with record numbers turning out across the world," said Avaaz campaign director Emma Ruby-Sachs.

Comments from Yahoo:

From an article at Last Resistance about the stupidity of climate change believers. Finally, scientists not on the government dole coming forward and telling the truth.

The scientists slammed policies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions as “nonsense,” and they criticized politicians and activists for claiming the world was on the path for catastrophic global warming.

“The most important thing to keep in mind is — when you ask ‘is it warming, is it cooling’, etc. — is that we are talking about something tiny (temperature changes) and that is the crucial point,” Dr. Richard Lindzen, a veteran climate scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

“We are speaking of small changes 0.25 Celcius would be about 51% of the recent warming and that strongly suggests a low and inconsequential climate sensitivity — meaning no problem at all,” said Lindzen, who is also a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute.

President Barack Obama and his activist allies are calling for U.N. delegates to sign onto a global treaty to reduce CO2 emissions. Obama has been heavily pushing for this treaty for the past year or so, even lobbying the Chinese government to sign onto an agreement.

“Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense,” Dr. Will Happer, a physicist at Princeton University, said during the panel Thursday hosted by the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation.

“They are all based on computer models that do not work. We are being led down a false path,” Happer argued.

But Lindzen and his fellow panelists said claims of the hottest year on record are “nonsense” because there’s so much uncertainty surrounding surface temperature readings — especially since scientists often make lots of adjustments to weather station readings.

“When someone points to this and says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense,” Lindzen said. “This is a very tiny change period. And they are arguing over hundredths of a degree when it is uncertain in tenths of a degree.”

“And the proof that the uncertainty is tenths of a degree are the adjustments that are being made,” Lindzen added. “If you can adjust temperatures to 2/10ths of a degree, it means it wasn’t certain to 2/10ths of a degree.”

As the world speeds towards Paris, Republicans have ramped up efforts to stop President Obama from being able to carry out his global warming agenda and impose a U.N. treaty on Americans.

Senate Republicans have passed two resolutions opposing carbon dioxide regulations on power plants, and lawmakers introduced a resolution opposed to any U.N. agreement Obama signs onto at the Paris climate summit.

“We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science,” Dr. Patrick Moore, an ecologist and the co-founder of Greenpeace, said of attempts to fight global warming during Thursday’s panel.

“We know for absolute certain that carbon dioxide is the stuff of life, the foundation for life on earth,” Moore said. “CO2 has provided the basis of life for at least 3.5 billion years.”

FROM ANOTHER ARTICLE:

In a recent study, NASA proved that not only is Antarctica not losing ice—but it’s actually gaining ice.

“For east Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica–there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas,” explained Jay Zwally, the report’s author, in a NASA press release. Meaning ice is forming much faster than its melting.

AND NOW BACK TO THE 1970s the DAWN OF THE ICE AGE: THEY JUST CAN'T MAKE UP THEIR MINDS
1970 - Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age - Scientists See Ice Age In the Future (The Washington Post, January 11, 1970)
1970 - Is Mankind Manufacturing a New Ice Age for Itself? (L.A. Times, January 15, 1970)
1970 - New Ice Age May Descend On Man (Sumter Daily Item, January 26, 1970)
1970 - Pollution Prospect A Chilling One (The Argus-Press, January 26, 1970)
1970 - Pollution's 2-way 'Freeze' On Society (Middlesboro Daily News, January 28, 1970)
1970 - Cold Facts About Pollution (The Southeast Missourian, January 29, 1970)
1970 - Pollution Could Cause Ice Age, Agency Reports (St. Petersburg Times, March 4, 1970)
1970 - Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century (The Boston Globe, April 16, 1970)
1970 - Pollution Called Ice Age Threat (St. Petersburg Times, June 26, 1970)
1970 - U.S. and Soviet Press Studies of a Colder Arctic (The New York Times, July 18, 1970)
1970 - Dirt Will Bring New Ice Age (The Sydney Morning Herald, October 19, 1970)
1971 - Ice Age Refugee Dies Underground (Montreal Gazette, Febuary 17, 1971)
1971 - Pollution Might Lead To Another Ice Age (The Schenectady Gazette, March 22, 1971)
1971 - Pollution May Bring Ice Age - Scientist Rites Risk (The Windsor Star, March 23, 1971)
1971 - U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming (The Washington Post, July 9, 1971)
1971 - Ice Age Around the Corner (Chicago Tribune, July 10, 1971)
1971 - New Ice Age Coming - It's Already Getting Colder (L.A. Times, October 24, 1971)
1971 - Another Ice Age? Pollution Blocking Sunlight (The Day, November 1, 1971)
1971 - Air Pollution Could Bring An Ice Age (Harlan Daily Enterprise, November 4, 1971)
1972 - Air pollution may cause ice age (Free-Lance Star, February 3, 1972)
1972 - Scientist Says New ice Age Coming (The Ledger, February 13, 1972)
1972 - Ice Age Cometh For Dicey Times (The Sun, May 29, 1972)
1972 - Ice Age Coming (Deseret News, September 8, 1972)
1972 - There's a new Ice Age coming! (The Windsor Star, September 9, 1972)
1972 - Scientist predicts new ice age (Free-Lance Star, September 11, 1972)
1972 - British Expert on Climate Change Says New Ice Age Creeping Over Northern Hemisphere (Lewiston Evening Journal, September 11, 1972)
1972 - Climate Seen Cooling For Return Of Ice Age (The Portsmouth Times, ‎September 11, 1972‎)
1972 - New Ice Age Slipping Over North (The Press-Courier, September 11, 1972)
1972 - Beginning of new ice age (The Canberra Times, September 12, 1972)
1972 - Ice Age Begins A New Assault In North (The Age, September 12, 1972)
1972 - Weather To Get Colder (Montreal Gazette, ‎September 12, 1972‎)
1972 - British climate expert predicts new Ice Age (The Christian Science Monitor, September 23, 1972)
1972 - Scientist Sees Chilling Signs of New Ice Age (L.A. Times, September 24, 1972)
1972 - Science: Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, November 13, 1972)
1972 - Geologist at Case Traces Long Winters - Sees Ice Age in 20 Years (Youngstown Vindicator, December 13, 1972)1972 - Ice Age On Its Way, Scientist Says (Toledo Blade, December 13, 1972)
1972 - Ice Age Predicted In About 200 Years (The Portsmouth Times, December 14, 1972)
1973 - New Ice Age coming? (Popular Science, January 1973)
1973 - The Ice Age Cometh (The Saturday Review, March 24, 1973)
1973 - Believe new ice age is coming (The Bryan Times, March 31, 1973)
1973 - 'Man-made Ice Age' Worries Scientists (The Free Lance-Star, June 22, 1973)
1973 - Fear Of Man-made Ice Age (The Spartanburg Herald, June 28, 1973)
1973 - Possibility Of Ice Age Worries The Scientists (The Argus-Press, November 12, 1973)
1973 - Weather-watchers think another ice age may be on the way (The Christian Science Monitor, December 11, 1973)
1974 - Ominous Changes in the World's Weather (PDF) (Fortune Magazine, February 1974)
1974 - Atmospheric Dirt: Ice Age Coming?‎ (Pittsburgh Press, February 28, 1974)
1974 - Support for theory of a cooling world (The Canberra Times, May 16, 1974)
1974 - New evidence indicates ice age here (Eugene Register-Guard, May 29, 1974)
1974 - Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, June 24, 1974)
1974 - 2 Scientists Think 'Little' Ice Age Near (Hartford Courant, August 11, 1974)
1974 - Ice Age, worse food crisis seen (Chicago Tribune, October 30, 1974)
1974 - Imminent Arrival of the Ice (Radio Times, November 14, 1974)
1974 - Making a BBC Science Special [The Weather Machine] (New Scientist, November 14, 1974)
1974 - The Weather Machine (BBC, November 20, 1974)
1974 - New ice age 'could be in our lifetime' (The Canberra Times, November 22, 1974)
1974 - Believes Pollution Could Bring On Ice Age (Ludington Daily News, December 4, 1974)
1974 - Pollution Could Spur Ice Age, Nasa Says (Beaver Country Times, ‎December 4, 1974‎)
1974 - Air Pollution May Trigger Ice Age, Scientists Feel (The Telegraph, ‎December 5, 1974‎)
1974 - More Air Pollution Could Trigger Ice Age Disaster (Daily Sentinel, ‎December 5, 1974‎)
1974 - Scientists Fear Smog Could Cause Ice Age (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 5, 1974)
1975 - Climate Changes Called Ominous (The New York Times, January 19, 1975)
1975 - Climate Change: Chilling Possibilities (Science News, March 1, 1975)
1975 - B-r-r-r-r: New Ice Age on way soon? (Chicago Tribune, March 2, 1975)
1975 - Cooling Trends Arouse Fear That New Ice Age Coming (Eugene Register-Guard, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 - Is Another Ice Age Due? Arctic Ice Expands In Last Decade (Youngstown Vindicator, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 - Is Earth Headed For Another Ice Age? (Reading Eagle, March 2, 1975)
1975 - New Ice Age Dawning? Significant Shift In Climate Seen (Times Daily, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 - There's Troublesome Weather Ahead (Tri City Herald, ‎March 2, 1975‎)
1975 - Is Earth Doomed To Live Through Another Ice Age? (The Robesonian, ‎March 3, 1975‎)
1975 - The Ice Age cometh: the system that controls our climate (Chicago Tribune, April 13, 1975)
1975 - The Cooling World (Newsweek, April 28, 1975)
1975 - Cooling trend may signal coming of another Ice Age (The Sun, May 16, 1975)
1975 - Scientists Ask Why World Climate Is Changing; Major Cooling May Be Ahead (PDF) (The New York Times, May 21, 1975)


The left is the same everywhere - Hitler, Stalin, Ho, Mao, Ortega, Castro - they are all the same -

1. Create a problem involving a moral imperative that no thoughtful, caring society could possibly ignore.


2. Marginalize any opposition by labeling it as greedy, selfish, and uncaring.


3. Employ a systematic propaganda war of lies and obfuscation to throw off any remaining opposition.


4. Use creative legislative tactics to thwart the normal system of checks and balances built into the American government.

5. Make people believe the only way to solve said problem is the creation of more government that stamps out individualism.

What I enjoy the most about the global warming leftist is that they will make you out to be a knuckle dragger if you don't believe them - they will say that you would have discredited Newton and Einstein or others throughout history with logical and scientific findings - but I don't remember Newton or Einstein fudging the numbers like the global warming scientist -

From US News & World Report -

Preliminary analysis of the contents of thousands of E-mails and documents taken from the computer archives of the Climate Research Unit at England's University of East Anglia—possibly by a hacker, possibly by a whistleblower—indicate a number of the world's most important scientists engaged in research designed to prove that global warming really does exist may have been cooking the books.

As columnist Michael Barone wrote in Sunday's Washington Examiner, "The CRU has been a major source of data on global temperatures, relied on by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But the e-mails suggest that CRU scientists have been suppressing and misstating data and working to prevent the publication of conflicting views in peer-reviewed science periodicals."

If true, the cooking of the temperature data to provide support for the idea that man-made global warming is occurring is a scandal of most serious proportions. It should force policymakers to reconsider the role science plays in the formulation of policy if its conclusions can be manipulated the way those concerning climate change now appear to have been.

Some of those involved in the E-mail chains that are now under examination have concocted what on their face come across as bizarre explanations for some of the things they said, many of which boil down to the notion that the words they used did not mean what they mean. It sort of takes us back to what the meaning of "is" is.

They have been engaged in a political war, using science as a weapon. The E-mails reveal the dangers inherent in relying on "approved science" as the last word on anything, especially if—as it now appears—some of the more influential supporters of the idea of global warming tried very hard to make sure that contrary theories and evidence that countered their assumptions and projections were never allowed to see the light of day, at least in any reputable scientific journal

All the climate change rhetoric is just the staging point for the next phase of the UN's Agenda 21. Basically it involves centralization of power in a One World government, a single unified economy, complete control and monitoring of the masses by making them completely dependent upon the government, and ultimately population controls (the elderly, mentally and physically disabled, and anyone who refuses to kowtow to "the program"). And before you say that's just crazy conspiracy theorism consider just how far the proponents of this stuff are going to push their message, from Prince Charles associating climate change with the Syria crisis to American liberals associating it with terrorism. Even the Pope is pitching climate change.

And why exactly do you think our governments have deliberately allowed foreign, unvetted "refugees" into our countries here and in Europe as well as hordes of illegal aliens from Mexico over the adamant objection of the citizenry and the interests of the nations they took oaths to uphold and defend? Because the next inevitable 911 will allow them the excuse...their Reichstag Fire...to freeze basic Constitutional freedoms, seize permanent power, and usher in their "vision". Yes, even the terrorists are pawns in a larger game here.

From Black Lives Matter to ISIS to the LGBT agenda, everything has been carefully orchestrated by the Obama administration to divide the citizenry and undermine our country's sense of identity and patriotism and traditional values, moral and otherwise. In many ways Europe's leaders have placed their respective countries even further along the path to One World compliance. I personally doubt that there will be a 2016 US Presidential election; whatever they've planned to close the trap will happen SOON, and the end of Western Civilization and truly free society will be at hand.


Global warming is the biggest hoax since all of the scientists thought the world was flat. It has already been proven to be a hoax in the US News & World Report article quoted above. People are ignoring the facts and inciting violence and name calling over denial. This is akin to what ISIS does to brainwash people into being Jihadis. The global warming movement is brainwashing people into believing the utter nonsense of global warming. What makes this even more ridiculous is that the so-called "scientists" who are supporting this are using statistics. Anybody who takes a course in statistics knows that you can make numbers say whatever you want them to by selectively choosing the dataset to prove your point. Anybody who is older than 50 knows that temperatures go in cycles. We can go for years with incredibly cold temperatures and then years with warm temperatures. So the "scientist"/"statistician" simply takes the dataset from when the temperatures were rising and says we have global warming. Then, they go the next step and blame the global warming on CO2 emission. We had far greater CO2 emissions in the late 1960's to the mid 1970's before current poklution controls, and the winters were freezing. I suggest that probably the opposite is true. CO2 either has no impact on temperatures or actually causes cooler temperatures. A much better explanation of temperature cycles has been provided by astronomers based on positioning of the sun and the planets. Why is this never mentioned?


Well, probably because that would render null and void the distribution of wealth through that there bank in Chicago that Al Gore and friends have that is issuing carbon credits and banking them.That should be on Google unless they scrubbed it. All this is a redistribution of wealth. To make the proletariat keep working to pay taxes and purchase battery powered cars that the battery costs at least over $5,000 to replace. And force you to use public transportation if you need to go over 200 miles from home charging base on a vacation.


IS THIS WARMING ANYTHING NEW?
NOT SO NEW, Medieval Warming Period, Roman Warm Period, Minoan Warm Period, all of which were warmer than today and the temp rose faster as well.
READ: climate geologist-1011 [Climate Change Catastrophes in Critical Thinking]
["Global Warming is Unprecedented"
Is it really?

If global warming is indeed in some way unprecedented, then we would expect to find no match for the current global warming trend in the geological record. Let us consider just the most recent Holocene epoch - dominated by human history.

Average near-surface temperatures of the northern hemisphere during the past 11,000 years compiled by David Archibald after Dansgaard et al. (1969) & Schönwiese (1995).

.

Looking at just the historical picture, shown in the graph above, we can see that global warming has happened many times before in human history. We've had the Minoan Warm Period, the Roman Climate Optimum, and the Medieval Warm Period in addition to the current warm period (Dansguard et al., 1968; Schönwiese, 1995; Keigwin, 1996). Note the steepness of the rise in temperature at the beginning of the Minoan warm period. This rate of warming far exceeds that of the current warm period. Huang et al. (1997) determined that the depiction of the Medieval Warm Period in this graph may be somewhat conservative. According to their study of 6000 boreholes worldwide, the global mean temperatures of the Medieval Warm Period dwarf the changes of the Twentieth Century.

The evidence shows repeatedly that global warming is not unprecedented and according to Ruddiman (2001) as well as Singer & Avery (2006), global warming is a regular cyclic phenomenon on planet Earth. In fact, the normal global mean temperature for planet earth given the Phanerozoic history, is actually 19.5 degrees Celcius; a full three degrees higher than the present mean.]


STEP ONE: Create a NONEXISTENT problem. CHECK
STEP TWO: Demand taxes to solve the NONEXISTENT problem. CHECK
STEP THREE: Shut down all debate & criticism of the NONEXISTENT problem. CHECK
STEP FOUR: Refuse all FOI requests on the NONEXISTENT problem. CHECK
STEP FIVE: Pretend to be solving the NONEXISTENT problem. CHECK


Liberal=Progressive=Democrat=Communist


climate change is just a globalists scheme to divide people worldwide.. those who believe any nonsense the government tells them, and those capable of thinking for themselves.. the ones much more prone to violence are those who have convinced the whole world is going to end if they don't become militant and attack the other part of the politician. so not only is it a scheme for global taxation, but a means to militarize and radicalize the truly stupid, and most impressionable sheep of the flock 


So let me see if I have this correct:

According to climate change "experts",

If it gets HOTTER, it's because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.

If it gets COLDER, it's because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.

If it gets DRIER, it's because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.

If it gets WETTER, it's because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.

If the ice INCREASES, it's because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.

If the ice DECREASES, it's because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.

If there are MORE storms, it is because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.

If there are LESS storms. it is because of climate change, and we must spend billions to fix it.



Follow the money. It's all about the Benjamins. It's *ALWAYS* been about the Benjamins!


The budget for NOAA alone has increased 50% under Obama. We are now paying $5.5 billion a year to support an agency that has set its prime reason for existence as support the failed theory of global warming and the corporate cronyism that politicians depend upon for contributions and support. .


We have weathermen at NOAA and NASA that CANNOT accurately predict the forecast 24 hours from...NOW but Kool Aid drinkers who believe that these same people can predict accurately what will happen in 50 years.


What in the world are these rich kid's demonstrating against? They are 100% on board with what is going to be signed in this meeting of the Elites. Unfortunately the middle class that will see their utility bills sky rocket after this and can't afford to send their kids over to Paris.


All this is communism trying to bring down capitalism.


How does the United States government taxing its citizens prevent China from polluting?


Don't you just love it when politicians and dictators get together and say they are going save the planet? These are the same people that would throw their own mother under the bus and are preparing for war as we speak. Just last week we blew up 100 oil tankers in the middle of the desert; was that an environmentally friendly act? Why not follow them to their destination and confiscate the oil? It would not have been good TV. As always war will determine the future and the prognosis is not good for individual freedom.


 Climate change is a political game of 3 card Monty, watch closely as you get fleeced...


I would support any global warming initiative that includes ZERO incremental big government spending, ZERO incremental big government headcount adds, and ZERO additional confiscation of wealth from the productive part of the economy (that would be private individuals, businesses, and grandchildren in the form of debt). I won't hold my breath.


But this week's talks are set to see decades-long disputes between rich and poor nations flare again and potentially prevent an agreement: With the National debt at $20 trillion dollars which is more debt than any other nation on earth, just where does that put the US, rich or poor?


Stop wasting tax payer money trying to fight a natural occurrence. Climate change has been cycling long before us humans were here.


 The biggest financial SCAM in the history of mankind.


"The best way to honour the memory of those who have fallen ... is to carry out what we have committed to": What??? That's a total non sequitor! A climate change agreement has nothing to do with honoring those killed in terrorist attacks.

I have to wonder how a person would say such a thing. Is his grasp of logic really that weak? Or is he trying to play psychological games, guilt-tripping people into agreeing to whatever he's proposing. And what about the listeners? Is anyone falling for this claptrap?

(BTW, my statements here should not be construed as opposition or support for a climate change agreement. I'm just highlighting a stupid speech.)


we are still coming out of an ice age. The average temperature per century varies by 20 or 30 degrees C. Where I live by Chicago use to be coral reefs! The biggest coral reef fossil in the world is located in the southwest burbs of chicago. The temperatures for each century is measured in the thickness of the layers in icebergs. The temperature on earth is cyclical, and has never remand constant. Stop watching the news and start thinking for yourself.


Google the Svensmark Theory for an alternative view of the cause of global warming.


The day of radical progressives is upon us for their God climate change and his son the weather command thee pay the Carbon tax...


Global warming does not exist. It has already been proven to be fraud and how many scientists have perpetuated this farce for money and greed.


You have to hand it to them, they have convinced a lot of people that natural climate errata is something they can change if only they give up their freedom, money and common sense.



Yes, folks our Climate is changing, has been changing for millions of years, before Man inhabited the earth, and will long after.


Solar hibernations or minimums and volcanic activity control the climate. So it's safe to say that the EPA and the UN, (New World Order) will control all of us, the sun and volcanoes. Who do I write the check to?


When you come up with a way to control the Sun then you can espouse your expertise on climate change, till then you are just an ignorant rump.


We have nothing to fear except Anthropogenic Global Warming itself. - FDR 0bama

It’s ridiculous for the 0bama Administration to call ISIS a “strategic distraction,” and then go on to climate change is the single most pressing National Security issue of our time.

If catastrophic climate change is the biggest present day threat to humanity, why is the COP21 meeting in Paris being guarded by thousands of armed security troops?


Try to stay warm or cool depending on whether you are warming or cooling.
Egad! It is hard to keep up.
You never know if the "World Leaders" & news media are for warming or cooling.
That is, I suppose, why they switched to "Climate change".
That way, they are covered whichever way the temperature goes.
And they keep on making money shoveling BS to the uneducated masses.
They believe everything our "Leaders" say.


Global Socialism spread the wealth under the guise of Global Warming carbon tax!


The elite banksters will stop at nothing to control the masses. This includes weapons manufacturing and distribution (of coarse taxation of the masses to accomplish this goal), a new and improved racial war. And of coarse a worldwide climate propaganda campaign designed to scare the masses into more taxation. And the brain dead souless liberal Democrats gobble it up like candy. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.


People rioting and protesting over mother nature.


Looks like the violent Team Soros paid goons will be out in full force keeping things warm while the planet cools.


The ones that believe in climate change, which happens every day !!! Are feeble minded and don't believe proof that temperature on earth has NOT changed in the last 18 years.


A bunch of brainwashed idiots. We are propelling towards a fascist run country with the endless government agencies controlling your pocketbook and many, many, other facets of your life.


When I was going to elementary school, we were being taught there was an ice age coming.
In recent years past, we are being told: Nope, our bad: It was really global warming.
Now that the global warming was shown to be bogus, they changed the name of their cause to "Climate Change".
I suppose they changed the name of the crisis to cover up "Stupid"
People, the earth goes through cycles. Just relax and enjoy the ride.


All of these demonstrators are financed out of the same pot of money.


Have you noticed what type of protester has a large presence at both Climate and Economic summits? The answer is Anarchists, Communists and Socialists. Look at some of the banners and signs that they are waving. Listen to the chants that they yell. These people are there primarily to protest against capitalism and individual liberty. What is the fundamental complaint that both movements share? Individuals are not to be trusted because they are wasteful and greedy. That all resources must be under the full control of the State. They despise the free market and completely ignore the fact that it has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty. Green is the new Red.


Just another way to pick our pockets by the elite. They get the power and we do without. But first they've got to disarm us in America.


Say goodbye to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights... Obama is going to sell us down the river to the Globalist Fabian NWO


Are we talking about rationing heating fuels, water, and beef products by raising their costs to where most folks cannot afford them?


The best part of all this climate change was 2 years ago when a group of scientists went to the arctic to see the polar ice caps melt got stuck in ice.


See the trouble you can start with bad information. I'm not sold on this global warming bull. Things have not be happening like they said it would. I find it amusing that they are anti-capitalist when this unproven cause will make a few people rich.


"Far left activists?" You mean "One World Socialists?" "Communists?" Those who would strike down freedom and liberty for their own nefarious agenda? "Climate change" is an absolute. Climate ALWAYS changes. You cannot refute an absolute, so it make the perfect agenda for tyrants. I suspect Obama will propose ending climate change by banning guns.


It shows the stupidity and corruption of the demonstrators who participate in the Public Sector Syndicate Climate Change hoax that will rape massive wealth from the citizens of the World. When the science and data today confirms that all temperature and sea level ranges are well within all previous ranges for the Earth's normal warming and cooling cycles that have been occurring for thousands of years, it confirms the corruption here by the Public Sector and these supporters. The only fact that is absolutely established is that the Public Sector Scientists have doctored the temperature data in order to support their narrative which is a total scientific hoax and a massive crime and fraud on the World citizens. This gathering or summit represents the highest crime ever planned on any citizen in the world.


Ice age, global warming climate change is is CHAOTIC
Back on May 13, 2014, French foreign minister Laurent Fabius made a joint appearance with Secretary of State John Kerry to warn the world that we only had 500 days left until “climate chaos.”
Here are his exact words on that day:
Well, I’m very happy to be with John. There is no week without a phone call or a visit between John and myself, and we have on the agenda many items, many issues – Iran, because negotiations are resuming today; the question of Syria, and we shall meet next Thursday in London together; Ukraine as well; and very important issues, issue of climate change, climate chaos. And we have – as I said, we have 500 days to avoid climate chaos. And I know that President Obama and John Kerry himself are committed on this subject and I’m sure that with them, with a lot of other friends, we shall be able to reach success on this very important matter. (source)
That’s right. If success isn’t reached on this very important matter by exactly Friday, September 25, 2015, chaos of the climate variety will definitely ensue.
France’s Fabius did not clarify what will happen on the 501st day that will mark the beginning of official “climate chaos,” but I imagine it’ll probably be a lot like the speech toward the end of the movie Ghostbusters:
Strange, however, that I was flipping through headlines and came upon the fact that a lottery has now opened up in NYC for people to attend a very special interfaith service by none other than the Pope at the September 11th Memorial and Museum WTC on exactly Friday, September 25, 2015 — the 500th day.
Weird timing, no?
So the Pope will be giving a sermon at Ground Zero on the 500th day, the day that we have been told “climate chaos” is set to ensue.
Had to wonder…is he there to officially announce the beginning of climate chaos?
On that same day, the Pope is also set to address the annual UN General Assembly of world leaders. According to the UN website, September 25th just so happens to kick off the United Nations three-day summit for the adoption of the post-2015 development agenda, “convened as a high-level plenary meeting of the General Assembly.”
The day before, he is going to address a joint meeting of Congress for the first time a Pope has ever addressed Congress. He will also be meeting with President Obama and Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. Busy Pope.


Pope Francis, as you may have heard, has also been all about the one-world government/religion stuff lately, as we previously reported:

In April 2015, Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, “made clear that a leading solution to global warming includes extreme depopulation.” Figueres said, “We can definitely change those [population] numbers and really should make every effort to change the numbers because we are already today, exceeding the planetary carrying capacity.”
The Vatican and United Nations also issued a joint statement in April. The “UN-inspired joint statement called for ‘reaching a level and sustainable population.’”
Gee, these buzz phrases are sounding awfully familiar…

The Brainwashing of a Nation in Four Basic Stages by Yuri Bezmenov

“It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy, exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxist-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counter-balanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result? The result you can see. Most of the people who graduated in the sixties, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their minds even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you cannot change the basic perception and illogical behavior. In other words, in these people the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To rid society of these people, you need another 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically-minded and common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of the United States society.” – 1985 Interview of Yuri Bezmenov, Russian-Born, KGB-Trained Subverter Who Defected to the United States