Private Power is the Power Running World Government

Fortunes of Britain's Super Rich Climb

May 7, 2011

AP - The fortunes of Britain's wealthiest individuals appear to have turned.

The 1,000 richest people in Britain increased their collective wealth by 18 percent in the past year and are now worth 395.8 billion ounds ($647.8 billion), according to a list published by the Sunday Times newspaper.

The newspaper will release in its Sunday edition its annual rundown of Britain's 1,000 richest individuals and families.

Steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal's family members held onto their position as the wealthiest people in Britain with a fortune of 17.5 billion pounds - but they are 22 percent poorer than a year earlier thanks to a drop in the share price of ArcelorMittal.

Fellow metals mogul Alisher Usmanov, a Russian who has a stake in English football club Arsenal, saw the biggest increase in wealth. He climbed six spots on the list to No. 2 after adding 7.7 billion pounds to his fortune. He is now worth 12.4 billion, according to the list.

The Duke of Westminster fell out of the top 3 for the first time since 1999 despite adding 250 million pounds to his fortune. The Briton owns huge parcels of land in central London and elsewhere.

For the first time, more than 100 women made the cut -- a feat that this year required a fortune of at least 70 million pounds. In 2010, the bar was set at 63 million while in 2008 it was 55 million.

The study shows that the number of billionaires in the U.K. now stands at 73 -- up from 53 a year earlier but just shy of the record of 75 set in the pre-crisis List of 2008, when the collective wealth of the top 1,000 was 413 billion pounds.

Billionaires Meet to Discuss Giving to Reshape the World to Their Liking

May 9, 2011

AP - What do dozens of American billionaires talk about when they get together? Their topic this week was, of course, money; not how to make it, but how to give it away.

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett said Friday that a private gathering was a great chance for the billionaires who have pledged to give away at least half their wealth to meet each other, compare notes, eat and laugh.

The media was banned from Thursday’s first meeting of the group that has accepted the giving challenge by Buffett and his friend Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Since June, 69 individuals or couples have made the giving pledge.

Buffett knew only about 12 of the 61 people at the dinner at the Miraval Resort in Tucson before the famously gregarious Berkshire Hathaway CEO worked the room and made 40 new friends.

“They all more than fulfilled my expectations,” Buffett told The Associated Press in a telephone interview.

Melinda Gates, co-chairwoman of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, said she was delighted by the openness of the virtual strangers. At one point, conversation at her table drifted toward the biggest mistakes people had ever made as philanthropists.

“One of the things about being a philanthropist, in many ways, it’s rather a lonely job,” said Tashia Morgridge, a retired special education teacher.

She works with her husband, Cisco Systems Chairman John Morgridge, to give money to improve U.S. education through the Denver-based Morgridge Family Foundation.

George Kaiser, a Tulsa, Okla., philanthropist who aids early childhood education and social services programs, said the giving pledge helps philanthropists who don’t want to just throw money at causes and instead want to explore the best ways to invest money to tackle the world’s biggest problems.

“Being able to share with other people who are agonizing about the same decisions is extraordinarily useful,” said Kaiser, the chairman of BOK Financial Corp who has been an oil and gas industry executive for four decades.

He led a session on applying analytical business practices to philanthropy.

The goals of the organization do not include working together to pool philanthropic dollars. Still, the meeting in Tucson that ended Friday included sessions where different philanthropists shared their passion to improve education, the environment and other causes.

Philosophies of giving and ideas for collaboration among the billionaires also were shared throughout the event, said Jean Case, CEO of the family foundation started by her and her husband, America Online founder Steve Case.

Chuck Feeney, a New Jersey philanthropist Buffett called the spiritual leader of the group, spoke about his plans to give all his money to charity.

“He wants his last check to bounce,” Buffett said.

Billionaires for Eugenics

May 8, 2011

Intel Hub - On May 5th, 2009, some of the most notorious members of the “billionaires club” — David Rockefeller, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Eli Broad, Peter G. Peterson, Patty Stonesifer, John Morgridge, Michael Bloomberg and a few other billionaires — secretly met at the Manhattan residence of Sir Paul Nurse, president of Rockefeller University.

The meeting was eerily similar to another meeting that took place on January 20, 1942, in Wansee, a Berlin suburb.

In the Wansee Conference, some high ranking Nazi officials, led by SS-Obergruppenführer Reinhard Heydrich, dispassionately discussed the more efficient methods to carry out the “Final solution to the Jewish question.”

Though European Jews were the main targets for elimination, other groups, especially Slavs, Romany and mentally and/or physically disabled Germans, were also persecuted and murdered. The total death toll is estimated at between 12 and 26 million.

As expected, the U.S. mainstream media was very careful not to inform the American people about the billionaires meeting in Manhattan, but some details eventually were known.

Quoting an anonymous person who attended the meeting, a major U.K. newspaper reported that “a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.”

According to other sources, billionaires who attended the secret meeting convened on the initiative of Bill Gates. Giving credibility to this is the fact that Gates had made similar points at a conference he attended on February 18, 2010, in Long Beach, California.

“Official projections say the world’s population will peak at 9.3 billion [up from 6.6 billion today] but with charitable initiatives, such as better reproductive healthcare, we think we can cap that at 8.3 billion,” Gates said.

Translated into plain English, this means that Mr. gates is planning to participate in the killing of more than a billion human beings.

Also present at the meeting in Manhattan was media czar Ted Turner, billionaire founder of CNN who stated in a 1996 interview for the Audubon nature magazine, where he said that a 95% reduction of world population to between 225-300 million would be “ideal.” In a 2008 interview at Philadelphia’s Temple University, Turner fine-tuned the number to 2 billion, a cut of more than 70% from today’s population.

The Rockefeller family is known for their generosity in contributing, through their non-profit, “philanthropic” foundations, to all causes whose goal is population control. Actually they were instrumental in the creation of the eugenics movement in the U.S., which later was exported to Germany where the Nazis brought it to its highest development.

Since the early 1920’s the Rockefeller Foundation began funding the eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich. Beginning in the 1950’s, John D. Rockefeller III, used his foundation money to create a population reduction neo-Malthusian program through his private Population Council in New York.

It is not a coincidence that all of the billionaires who attended the Manhattan meeting are strong supporters of the creation of a New World Order. The NWO they envision is the global, communo-fascist totalitarian regime that will be implemented after they have killed 70% of the current world’s population and reduced the survivors to pre-industrial level of consumption.

This will be a techno-fascist medieval society with no middle class, with only the dirty poor serfs confined to decaying cities and the billionaire masters living in fortified castles, enjoying the beauty of a depopulated Gaia.

Some naïve people see this as another unfounded conspiracy theory. Their rationale is based on the belief that they would not want to kill us, when they need us as consumers to further engross their fortunes. We must remember that, when news spread that the Nazis were killing the Jews, some people, including some Jews, didn’t believe it.

The Nazis, they reasoned, needed them to exploit as slave labor in the war factories. Unfortunately, the ones who thought that ended up in the extermination camps. Trying to find logic in the minds of mass murderers is a perilous exercise in frustration.

Early this year, enviro-journalist Bryan Nelson wrote a Mother Nature Network report entitled “Was Genghis Khan History’s Greenest Conqueror?” In it, he claimed that Genghis Khan’s invasions of the 13th and 14th centuries were so sweeping, it “may have been the first instance in history of a single culture causing man-made climate change.” According to Nelson, Genghis Khan contributed to cool the environment by “effectively scrubbing around 700 million tons of carbon from the atmosphere.”

Obviouysly, if Nelson survives the planned mass killing, he would happily write an article claiming that the eugenicist billionaires have gained their rightful place in history as the greenest mass killers in human history. I would not be surprised if somebody suggests carving their smiling faces in Mount Rushmore honoring their success in saving Gaia from us useless eaters.

Had a group of people secretly met to plan the assassination of one single person, it would be a conspiracy to commit a murder, a crime penalized by the U.S. law. But, even though the Manhattan meeting eventually leaked to the press, none of the would-be mass murderers have been indicted. Obviously, these billionaires see themselves above the law because they are above the law.

The would-be mass murderers’ rationale for wanting to kill more than a billion of us is that the Earth resources are limited, and we consume and pollute too much. But just a perfunctory analysis of the problem evidences that any of the billionaires who attended the secret meeting consume and pollute more in a single day than the people of some small third-world countries do in a year. Therefore, I would have expected that, if they really wanted to solve the problem in order to save the planet, they have plans to commit suicide after having killed their whole families.

Actually, just from the point of view of efficiency, that solution may be much more practical. But no. The hyper-polluter billionaires want to do it the hard way, by killing you, me, and several billion more. I guess that currently Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot are turning around in their graves, knowing that these billionaires are trying harder to beat their records as the greatest mass murderers in modern history.

Death By Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics (Excerpt)

September 22, 2010

Progressive Radio Network - Bill Gates' mission to protect poorer populations from disease through mass vaccination, his sense of urgency that the global population is too large and needs to be reduced, and his deep financial and collaborative enterprises with the oligarchic elite, health agencies and multilateral organizations — with a past history of eugenic intentions and experimentation — make for a bizarre mix that raises serious questions about the truth behind his Foundation's motives... Nobody should doubt the eugenic agenda remains alive and well in America. In fact, behind the closed corridors among the global elite, it is gaining fuel. For these people, sacrificing poor people in the developing world on the altar of a distorted Manifest Destiny, and setting their own rules in modern technologies — vaccines and GMO seeds — with the potential to destroy every unborn child, is simply racism and bigotry...

The wealthiest elite on the planet are rarely questioned about the correctness of their actions and schemes. As long as one of these individuals says he is giving huge sums of money to a cause to end disease and suffering, we are not supposed to probe further. Rather, in the case of mainstream media, such people are to be worshiped as saviors. The oligarchic elite are so well interconnected on multiple boards of directors, clubs for the rich and powerful, think tanks, and among the high ranks of elected legislators and politicians, that it is difficult to have an open and honest debate on the merits of their actions and spending. When a Ted Turner says we should reduce the world's population by more than half, and Bill Gates suggests a 15 percent reduction, do we really understand they are following a form of eugenic genocide?



Read More...