Shadow Government Wants to Seize All Weapons, Including Personal Citizen-owned Conventional Firearms Used for Hunting and Self Defense, and Draw Down the U.S. Military Under an "International Agreement to Establish an Effective System of International Control," a "UN Peace Force"

The UN Programme of Action (PoA) and the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) are arms control processes that take place within the framework of the United Nations. They are developed and advanced by the 193 UN Member States; however, elements of the two processes and what they aim to achieve are very different. Click here for a chart that outlines and clarifies some of the major differences between the PoA and the UN ATT.

The ATT passed by a huge majority on April 2, 2013. The U.S. signed the treaty on September 23, 2013. In the U.S., the biggest pro-gun lobby group, the National Rifle Association, vowed to fight against ratification of the treaty by the Senate, although the UN says the treaty does nothing to interfere with domestic firearms legislation. However, a comprehensive ATT would cover all conventional arms, including small arms and light weapons and possibly ammunition.

On the last day of the Arms Trade Treaty conference, which began in March 2013, the North Lawn building buzzed with reporters seeking perspectives. There were Russian and Arab TV crews, Japanese magazine journalists, and writers from at least half a dozen African publications. The U.S. media presence, hailing from the world's largest arms exporter, was harder to find. Which is to say, it was nearly impossible to find. In two weeks of commingling with ATT delegates and observers, the only American reporters I met were Ginny Simone, the face of NRA News, and Richard Johnson, a freelancer who has covered the U.N. since Brezhnev, most recently for an obscure website called South-South News. "In terms of media, it's gotten pretty sleepy around here," said Johnson, before recounting the glory days of the 1970s. "Now it's more about Twitter than press conferences. The institutional media only flocks when North Korea does something, or there's drama in the Security Council."  This lack of media presence was reflected in the pages of the nation's largest newspapers, which largely ignored the treaty negotiations. The Washington Post was a no-show. So was The Wall Street Journal. The Los Angeles Times reported from the West Coast on a State Department press release and published a story on the treaty's passage credited to "Times Staff and Wire Reports." [Alexander Zaitchik, Media Matters, April 3, 2013]

On December 4, 2015, the Zionist-controlled New York Times called for the confiscation of firearms from U.S. citizens in a bombshell front-page editorial—the first one in almost 100 years.

Treason: The Disarmament of the United States, and the Declaration of World Government [Excerpt]

October 30, 2013

Timothy A. Pope - CFR member and Judge Advocate General of the US Navy Admiral Chester Ward wrote:

"The main purpose of the CFR is promoting the disarmament of US sovereignty and national dependence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government." 

This high ranking military officer went on to explain their procedures for influencing policy, claiming:

"Once the ruling members of the CFR shadow government have decided that the US government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition."

And that is precisely what is now happening among the ranks of our military command structure. The shake-up (identification, vilification and nullification) of all flag officers and other ranking commanders loyal to the Republic and the US Constitution who will not outwardly go along with the one world government—the main opposition force—are being confounded, discredited and removed.

One world government, you say?

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg, founder of the United World Federalists, who helped fund Hitler's rise to power during the Nazi's Third Reich, confidently declared to the United States Senate:

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." 

In America, the original seeds of world government were planted by Truman in the US Public Law 87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act. Look it up.



PL87-297 calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961 by John F. Kennedy and every US president since has worked to enact its provisions.

The government knows you will not approve, which is why they want to take away your firearms. Title 22 USC § 2551 is the congressional statement of purpose, and defines the government's meaning of "disarmament." It calls for the "elimination of our armed forces," and the "elimination of weapons of all kinds." That means your personal citizen-owned conventional firearms used for hunting and self defense.

Public Law 101-216 is the sister document to 87-297. In a clear-cut violation of his oath of office, it was signed into law by George Herbert Walker Bush on December 11, 1989. It calls for the divesting of our common defense, including the elimination of weapons of all kinds, and a draw-down of all branches of our armed forces.

From Title V, Sec 61 of PL101-216:

"(2) as defined in this Act, the terms 'arms control' and 'disarmament' mean 'the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement to establish an effective system of international control'."

Let me read that last part again to you, in case you missed it, "...TO ESTABLISH AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL CONTROL."

Do you understand? That's what all of this about, control, not peace.

Since PL87-297 was first passed into law, there have been 18 amendments made to it, and the US House of Representatives votes bi-annually to appropriate funds for this and other on-going programs like PL101-216.

In Stage 1 of the program, we are to reduce our armed forces to 2.1 million men, and transfer (on a permanent basis) one-half of them to be merged with the Russian and Chinese armies. In Stage 2, the remaining one-half of our armed forces is then turned over to the Security Council of the United Nations. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by agreement, always be a Russian.

The world's smaller nations turn 100% of their armies over to the same under-secretary of the Security Council in Stage 2. Former President George H.W. Bush and Admiral William J. Crowe referred to this process as being "in transition." The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage 3 of the disarmament process is to "proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force."

You see? It is already done on paper. The treason has been done. Now, all the involved traitors must sell the American people on disarmament before we get wind of what has been perpetrated; before we become outraged and bring them all to justice.

The Obama administration is systematically purging all who would stand in the way of the edicts of the United Nations Charter, and Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely was correct in his assumption that "Obama is intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower."

Duty personnel backed up Vallely's concern, suggesting that the firings are meant to send a message to "young officers down through the ranks" not to criticize the president or White House politics.

Little do they know, unless they have a lot of time to read and study historic documents, US codes and charters, that the message was sent long before they were even born. And if they want to keep their job [and pension], they are told to keep their mouth shut and follow orders.

What is the historic precedent set for dutiful commanders and NCO's who follow orders, no matter what? The night of the long knives. After all, the international power base can't trust anyone in the long run, can they?

Then, all that will be left, according to the UN Charter, Memorandum 7277, and US Public Laws 87-297 and 101-216, is the United Nations world army, where no nation would have the military power to challenge them.

What other international body besides the UN could possibly be behind establishing world government?

It is the same United Nations that declared in an official report in July of 2001:

"Civilian ownership of any firearm in the US threatens the legitimate power monopoly of the state." 

In contrast, our Second Amendment protects "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" from any infringement, proclaiming a "well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State." NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF OUR FREE STATE. No state or people will ever be free under a totalitarian world government. If Americans abdicate our freedom to an international order, we will never get it back.

Governments and kingdoms never willingly relinquish power unless by force. With that said, power is never bestowed upon rulers unless the people allow it. Frederick Douglass said that "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will." And the globalist and desired change agent Henry Kissinger is known to have often said, "Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac."

Kissinger also stated in an address to the Bilderberg meeting at Evian, France on May 21, 1992:

"The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." 

Senator Joseph McCarthy was onto something, but he didn't really know what to call it. Regardless, he was not allowed to get too close to the truth. What we know as the United States Government is not our real government. It was overthrown long ago by authoritarian socialists posing as liberals in favor of illegitimate corporate law. Our Constitutional Republic was displaced by the blueprint for world government, the United Nations Charter, and our imposter government has been operating under its international law directorates ceremonially, until the time that Stage 3 of the disarmament plan can be implemented.

All of the traitors in the House and Senate know this and have continued funding it. All of our presidents since Kennedy have known it and signed-off on it. Our State Department, military commands, executive, legislative and judicial branches all know it and are following it to the letter behind a thin veil of nationalism.

Now you know why the Constitution and Bill of Rights are no longer a legal defense for an American citizen in a United States court of law. Because we have (knowingly or unknowingly) contracted away our constitutional protections and are a ward of the United States Corporation in agreement with the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which falls directly under the UN Charter.

The treason is in the ratification, implementation and amendments of these edicts, without the consent of the governed, to further the aims of the international community against the United States of America.

Article III, Section 3, Clause 2 of the US Constitution defines treason and its punishment thusly:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted." 

The United States Code 18 U.S.C. § 2381 (the treason clause) states:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason..."

Treason is a capital crime punishable by attainder of the REAL elected Constitutional Congress, by imprisonment or death.

"...and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

I can think of no greater breach of national security—no more significant example of treason—than levying war against our United States in adherence to our enemies for the purpose of disarming our people and military defenses, to end our national sovereignty in the guise of peace.

Barack Obama is disarming our nation in accordance with the UN Charter. He is purging top brass who are refusing to go along with privately-owned weapons confiscation programs under a martial law scenario, and administering litmus tests to find out who among them will fire on American citizen resistors if ordered to do so. He is passing illegal legislation to disarm law-abiding citizens (the unorganized militia which is necessary to the security of a free State). He is weakening military readiness by making defense budget cuts while funding the UN, grounding squadrons of air superiority fighter wings, and withholding military pay. He issued the stand-down order for reinforcements in Benghazi. He is dismantling our nuclear defense capabilities and shut down the US Air Force Space Fence surveillance system after 50 years, an early warning system that tracks incoming debris and meteors that could pose an emergency threat.

Most disturbingly, however, Obama scaled-back technology on US missile defense systems and pulled the plug entirely on our southern air defense system. Utilized by the US Air Force, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) program identifies enemy aircraft and missiles that may penetrate the border and cross into US airspace.

That's right, Aerostat flight operations was ordered to cease TARS operations and prepare sites for permanent closure. An Exelis employee close to the TARS project had this to say about the closure of the sites:

"Not only will this closure mean hundreds of people will be out of jobs, but it also means our borders will not be safe. These defense radars detect low-flying aircraft infiltrating our borders.

Without these defense radars, low-flying aircraft will go undetected. It will be open season for any drug/gun/slave smugglers, terrorists flying in with nukes, low altitude missiles, or even a full scale low elevation invasion/attack against America." 

Many writers and talking heads are spinning their wheels, debating how it’s difficult to imagine the motivation behind the move to further weaken US air defenses on the southern border. They are busy pointing out that the US government has chosen to shutdown this outward facing surveillance system, and has instead turned the surveillance inward, on the American people, spending hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to do it. They are asking the question that if September 11, 2001 was any indication of our air defense capabilities, and considering that any ground invasion of the United States would originate on our southern border, then wouldn’t we want as many early warning systems as possible to be actively protecting our country in these specific areas?

Yes, We the People would. And all the while, Russia, China and Iran are all propelling their defense technology, investing billions into improving military readiness, proliferating weapons and shoring-up alliances with each other AGAINST the United States.

You see, the mainstream and alternative media are all sheltering-in-place among the accepted surface-level spectrum of debate, but are missing the point. It's the big elephant in the room that no one dares acknowledge, that we are a captured operation.

We are already captured by a foreign unelected body of power-hungry authoritarians who understand that the sovereignty of the United States of America is the only thing that stands in the way of their world government agenda. And we are already under international law, our constitutional protections dismantled and abrogated to the trash pile of history by a beast system that covets a secular world order in which no nation would have the power to stand against it.

And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? (Revelation 13:4) 

All beast systems spoken of in the Bible were in reference to a government or kingdom. Why a beast? Because a beast, a wild animal, cannot be reasoned with.

So yes, Obama is intentionally weakening and gutting our military, and reducing us as a superpower. It is his assignment, and he is merely following the orders of his world federalist superiors, who represent the new world order. Every member of his regime are guilty of conspiracy to commit treason, as were most of the presidential regimes since Kennedy.

None of this is by accident. It is a very carefully crafted and orchestrated plan, as Franklin D. Roosevelt admitted, "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

Click here to read the article for a few profound examples of the stated long-term plan for disarmament and the installation of world government under international socialism.

Please listen to the 13-part audio series by William Cooper from January 1994, entitled 'Treason: World Government Declared'. It is the most comprehensive culmination of research on this subject anywhere in the world:

Treason: World Government Declared
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Part 12
Part 13