Jade Helm, Agenda 21 (Agenda for the 21st Century), Earth Charter and 'The Ark of Hope'

Maurice Strong, a former MI6 British Intelligence officer, is a member of the secret global ruling elite. Strong is just one of many, many players and organizations that have been working over many years to implement the "Plan," which British General Cornwallis says had been formulated prior to the conclusion of the American Revolution. Ex-British intelligence officer, Dr. John Coleman, asserts that the Aspen Institute of Colorado is the “American home of the Socialist-One-World-Government Committee of 300,” of which Maurice Strong is a member. He summarizes the character and goals of the Conspiracy as follows:

The motivating force, the reason for the One World Conspiracy such as we see in its visible elements, the Club of Rome, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Cini Foundation, the Bilderbergers, and the Trilateral Commission, the Royal Society for International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Aquarians, is the destruction of the Christian religion first, followed by other religions (particularly the Muslim religion) and an end to industrial growth, destruction of technology and a return to feudalism and the New Dark Ages, coupled with a huge reduction in population that their plans require, because the millions of “useless eaters” will no longer be needed in a post-industrial society. 

Implementation of the “Plan” would result in the engineered depopulation of over half of the human community and forced imposition of a feudalistic world governed by an “occult theocracy,” the only form of government that is more despotic than fascism or communism.

Retired General on Jade Helm and the Coming Chaos

Is Crestone/Baca, Colorado “the Vatican City of the New World Order?” [Excerpt]

The entire environmental movement had been co-opted by our power elite as an excuse to impose progressively greater socialist/communist restrictions on our citizenry.

By Dr. Eric Karlstrom
January 2012

Maurice Strong, world savior, author of Agenda 21 (Agenda for the 21st Century) and Earth Charter, and “The Ark of Hope”

1. Agenda 21. (Information here is taken from my article: “Green Global Dictatorship: Regional Governance, UN Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, and the Wildlands Project” (http://waterwatchalliance.us/ch11.html):

As its policies have been put into place, it has become clear that U.N. Agenda 21 is antithesis to the U.S. Constitution. U.N. Agenda 21 is worldwide collectivist government under the penumbra of the United Nations.

Freedom 21, Santa Cruz

Maurice Strong was both Secretary General of the 1992 UNCED Rio Earth Summit and principle author of the United Nations’ Agenda 21 (Agenda for the 21st century) that was unveiled at the 1992 Earth Summit.

Agenda 21 is a 3000-page, 40-chapter, “soft-law” policy adopted by 179 nations, including the United States, as a work plan to implement ‘Sustainable Development.’ Maurice Strong set the tone for the 1992 UNCED conference and the future when he stated:

Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class-- involving high meat consumption and large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations.

In other words, the globalists’ plan is to reduce the U.S. and other first world nations to the level of Third World nations.


At first blush, Agenda 21 sounds good to many well-meaning people. However, in "U.S. Military Targets Southeast Colorado (Part 3 of 3) (http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/spingola/080525), Spingola notes:

Agenda 21 is a very well-organized plan to reinvent and regionalize government beginning with the 'rural cleansing' of America and those referred to by the elite ruling class as resource-draining, expendable, “useless eaters.” Because Agenda 21 provides guidelines for local, regional, national, as well as global governance, it is radically transforming the entire world.

In "The Green Agenda: Agenda 21- The UN Blueprint for the 21st Century," (http://green-agenda.com/agenda21.html), we read:

Like most “green movement initiatives,” Agenda 21 is a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.” It is not an environmental management policy, but an attempt to impose a global centrally-planned quasi-government administered by the United Nations. Under Agenda 21, all central government and local authority signatories are required to conform strictly to a common prescribed standard and hence, this is just communism resurrected in a new guise.

The fact that most people still have not even heard of Agenda 21, even though it was ratified in by 179 governments in 1992 and is now being implemented worldwide, reveals the depth of interpenetration and cooperation between corporations, government, NGO’s, and the media.

In “Why Are Americans Ignorant of ‘Agenda 21’” (http://www.newswithviews.com/Morrison/joyce36.htm), Morrison notes that Agenda 21 is "the global plan to change the way we 'live, eat, learn and communicate’ because we must save the earth.”

In "Local Agenda 21: The U.N. Plan for Your Community (http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/la21_198.html), Berit Kjos notes:

Its (Agenda 21) regulation would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation- even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system.

Agenda 21 seeks to regionalize America and other nations for the benefit of a tiny international elite. Regionalism works to blur political boundaries, take decision-making authority away from local peoples, and allow elected representatives to dodge accountability. The blurring of political boundaries, along with privatization of public assets, allows state collectivists to steal the wealth of the people. The goal of state collectivists is to abolish private property, increase government control over people, and to forcefully replace individualism with collectivism. Agenda 21 is also designed to implement the United Nations Charter and establish global governance under the United Nations. The U.N. Charter posits that ordinary humans are “biological resources” to be arranged by the elite into a sustainable number of worker bees and bee keepers. Indeed, under the U.N. Charter, as contrasted with the U.S. Constitution, peoples’ rights are dependent upon his/her usefulness and compliance to the will of the elite.

In “Agenda 21- What is it? How Did it Get Here?” (http://www.freedom21santacruz.net/site/article.php?sid=394), Henry Lamb states:

(Agenda 21) is a set of policy recommendations designed to reorganize global society around the principles of environmental protection, social equity, and what is called “sustainable” economic development. At the heart of the concept of sustainable development, is the assumption that government must manage society to ensure that human activity conforms to these principles. The idea that government is inherently empowered to manage the affairs of society is diametrically opposed to the idea that the just power of government is derived from the consent of the governed. As these conflicting principles collide in the arena of public policy, the people who are governed are losing the ability to limit the power of government. Consequently, government power over people is expanding. Nowhere is this transformation more dramatic than in the policies governing private property rights and the use of land and its resources…. The paradigm shift from sacred private property rights to government-managed land use is a perfect example of how sustainable development is transforming America into a government-managed society.

This transformation is not the result of a deliberate decision made by elected representatives after a fair and public debate. It is the result of years of subtle influence and obscure processes relentlessly imposed through the United Nations’ agencies and organizations, and multitude of non-governmental organizations accredited by, and sympathetic to the United Nations’ agenda.

Lamb further notes that the most influential NGOs (non-governmental organizations) in the formulation of Agenda 21 were the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Worldwide Fund for Nature (formerly the World Wildlife Fund, and still known as WWF), and the World Resources Institute (WRI). These three organizations also participated in the preparations for the UN Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I) in 1976, which produced the first formal UN-Rockefeller Brothers Fund documents, compiled and edited by William K. Reilly,” including The Use of Land: A Citizen’s Policy Guide to Urban Growth (1972), The Unfinished Agenda (1977), and Blueprint for the Environment (1988).

In his introduction to The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide, Maurice Strong calls on local leaders around the world to “undertake a consultative process with their populations and achieve a consensus on 'Local Agenda 21' for their communities.” In practice, achieving this consensus generally means painting very scary scenarios of a dying planet in order to frighten children, anger youth and persuade adults to submit to unthinkable regulations. It means blaming climate change on human industrial activities while ignoring the much greater importance of natural climate cycles.

In “Local Agenda 21: The U.N. Plan for Your Community,” (http://www.crossroads.to/text/articles/la21_198.html), Berit Kjos notes that Agenda 21 calls for each community to formulate its own “Local Agenda 21.” This document states:

Land….cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals… Public control of land use is therefore indispensable.” Thus the document recommends that:

1) all countries establish a national policy on human settlements which should 2) facilitate population redistribution according to availability of resources. And 3) governments must maintain full jurisdiction and exercise complete sovereignty over such land with a view to freely planning development of human settlements.

Governments exercise complete sovereignty over land and plan the development of ‘human settlements?’ Sounds like pure, totalitarian communism to me. Welcome to the “Gulag Archipeligo’ Part II. (Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s novel, Gulag Archipeligo is his personal account of the forced labor and concentration camp system in the Soviet Union).

2.  The Earth Charter.  In 1994, two years after the UNCED Rio Earth Summit, Maurice Strong launched the Earth Charter Initiative as well as his newly formed Earth Council.  In 1997, the Earth Council and (Mikhail Gorbechev’s) Green Cross International formed an Earth Charter Commission.  The final text of the Earth Charter was approved at a meeting of the Earth Charter Commission at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris in March, 2000. The authors were Maurice Strong, Steven Rockefeller (Chairman of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund), and Mikhail Gorbachev (former premier of the Soviet Union, Chairman of the Russian Communist Party, and Head of the ‘environmental’ group, Green Cross International). 

The Earth Charter itself is a 2,400-word document divided into “pillars” that represent sixteen main principles.  Basically, it sets forth the means for establishing a global government based on communist ideology and New Age beliefs.  It has definite religious overtones, but these involve the twisting and often negation of the Judeo-Christian principles that have provided the underpinnings of Western civilization.

Maurice Strong declared: “The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments.”  Gorbachev elaborated, stating:  “Do not do unto the environment of others what you do not want done to your own environment…. My hope is that this charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments, a “Sermon on the Mount,” that provides a guide for human behavior toward the environment in the next century.”

Clearly, in producing a quasi-scriptural document that would dictate all human behavior henceforth, Strong and Gorbachev are attempting to exercise enormous power and influence over all their fellow humans.   Just what are their personal spiritual beliefs?

Strong has stated: We are all gods now; gods in charge of our own destiny.  (Obviously, Strong believes that humans have now supplanted God and now rule the earth.  But wasn’t this the very same “deal” that Satan offered Adam and Eve in the garden when he said:  “Ye shall surely not die.. for then your eyes shall be opened and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil?”  Genesis: 2:4-5).  Gorbachev has also indicated his beliefs:  “Cosmos is my God.  Nature is my God.”   This is pantheism, plain and simple.  

As might be expected, then, based on the personal beliefs of its authors, the Earth Charter itself is New Age and Humanistic in its ideology.   In “The Earth Charter and the Ark of Hope: Eco-Socialism as a Tool for Enslavement,” Huxwell voices his main criticisms of the Earth Charter as follows:

In place of the simple elegance of the (Ten Commandments) that provide rules for self-government and social stability, the Earth Charter calls for the imposition of a global tyranny over every aspect of human activity which becomes evident once you strip away the rhetorical devices and eco-socialist jargon… The program calls for all individuals to be “guided and assessed” by an unspecified group of managers and to accept a subsistence level existence regardless of their individual aspirations. The hypocrisy of these billionaire globalists preaching about virtues of universal poverty is mind boggling.

3. The “Ark of Hope.”  In order to maintain the fiction that the Earth Charter is a sacred edict from ‘on-high,’ the Earth Charter has been inscribed on papyrus paper and is now enshrined in a wooden box called the “Ark of Hope.”   This “Ark of Hope,” decorated with neo-pagan artwork, has been paraded around the world by “true believers.”   According to Contender Ministries (“Ark of Hope: The Ark of the New Age Covenant”):

In many ways, the Ark of Hope was designed as a Satanic, half price knock-off of the Ark of the Covenant (which housed the Ten Commandments). It is a wooden chest. The four sides have various artwork and represent the four directions and also four elements (earth, water, fire, and air). The top of the ark features artwork that represents the fifth element, spirit. Around the edges of the top are a variety of religious and cultic symbols, including the occult pentagram!

The attempt to blaspheme the Ark of the Covenant is no chance occurrence. The contents of the Ark are as dark as its design, and include the Earth Charter written on papyrus, “Temenos Earth masks,” and over 300 “Temenos Books” designed by artists and school children from Vermont. Temenos is a concept adopted by Carl Jung to denote a magic circle, a special place where special rules and energies apply. 

Hence, we begin to see that Maurice Strong is the harbinger of a New World Order Religion, that religion is New Age, pagan, and occult in its nature.  


Ark of Hope aboard the Clearwater sailing into New York City

In a May 1990 interview, "The Wizard of the Baca Grande,” with WEST magazine, Strong related the following scenario:

Each year the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a thousand CEOs, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics gather in February to attend meetings and set the economic agendas for the year ahead. What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? Will the rich countries agree to reduce their impact on the environment? Will they agree to save the earth?

The group's conclusion is "no." The rich countries won't do it. They won't change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about? 

This group of world leaders form a secret society to bring about a world collapse. It's February. They're all at Davos. These aren't terrorists - they're world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world's commodity and stock markets. They've engineered, using their access to stock exchanges, and computers, and gold supplies, a panic. Then they prevent the markets from closing. They jam the gears. They have mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davos as hostage. The markets can't close. The rich countries...?

The journalist adds: "And Strong makes a slight motion with his fingers as if he were flicking a cigarette butt out of the window.  I sat there spellbound.... He is, in fact, co-chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum.  He sits at the fulcrum of power.  He is in a position to do it."

George W. Hunt and the Fourth World Wilderness Congress of 1987 



Christian businessman George Hunt attended a number of semi-secret United Nations planning sessions in Colorado in the late 1980’s.  These meetings were preparatory for the Rio Earth Summit of 1992.  Hunt’s eye-witness testimony offers one of the most powerful clarifications yet of:  1) Strong’s role in the globalist “Plan,” 2) the details of the “Plan” itself, and 3) Crestone/Baca’s intended role in the “Plan.” Hunt stated:

(In 1987) I attended The Fourth World Wilderness Congress.   Maurice Strong, the convener, said it was called the Fourth World because it was the fourth one of these environment congresses that Edmund de Rothschild had created.  I learned later that the World Order refers to the coming One World Government as the Fourth World, or world control by the World Order where there is no more First, Second, or Third Worlds, just a boundary-less planet which is called the “fourth world wilderness.”  Yogis and shamans refer to it as the “fourth world wilderness,” the “lostness of the mind.”  The” lostness of the mind” refers to the collective consciousness.   Persons will be coerced through lies, drugs, fear, and pain to surrender themselves, their egos to the collective consciousness. 

The Fourth World will be a return to a society much like the Caesar’s or Babylon or the Fourth Reich, within the fictionalized societies described in Huxley’s Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited and Orwell’s classic, 1984.  We will flourish with only a whimper.  The World Order wants to create a new society out of the ashes of chaos; a collectivist Fourth World complete with a collectivist religion, collectivist finance and unchecked world national socialism (fascism).  The World Order will offer Gaia, mother earth, to the masses as the big brother image to worship in the Fourth World.

Maurice Strong has already has set up a 140,000-acre project in Crestone, Colorado to develop this earth religion system.  Projects are funded by the Rockefeller Fund among other foundations.  The (1992 Rio) Earth Summit will link environment with industry.  The Lords of the UNCED Conference will be the masters of who gets what and when if we don’t do something about it quickly.

Who leads the environmental movement?  The Convener of the (Rio Earth) Summit, Maurice Strong, identifies Baron Edmond de Rothschild as the creator of the environment movement.  Strong states that Rothschild is the positive synthesis of environment on the one hand (that’s the thesis) and growth and development on the other (that’s the antithesis).  Strong very clearly admits that the Rothschild combination, including the Rockefellers and most world capitalists, aim to control the environment and development movement as the synthesis (of the thesis and anti-thesis in the Hegelian dialectic).  Power will converge into their hands through the (1992) Rio Conference.  The synthesis, the head of the power, merges into the hands of the House of Rothschild.

Another speaker at the Fourth World Conference was David Rockefeller, world energy capitalist and banker.  He was named “Mr. Growth and Development” at the meeting.  His counterpart, William Ruckelshaus, organizer of the EPA and creator of its laws under Presidents Ford and Reagan, was dubbed “Mr. Environment.”

“Mr. Environment,” Ruckelshaus, is the CEO and Chairman of the Board for BFI, Browning-Ferris Industries, one of the largest private environment companies in the world.  The hypocrisy is that Ruckelshaus as EPA chief, made the very laws by which his waste company, BFI, is becoming rich.  Hypocrisy number two is that Ruckelshaus and Maurice Strong were key investors in American Water Development, a company which tried to circumvent Colorado water laws and gain control of one of the largest underground reservoirs of water in the world…..

I did a survey of the people down in the San Luis Valley.  And I asked what will happen when Maurice Strong and William Ruckelshaus and others will pull 200,000 acre feet of water/year out of the San Luis Valley?   It was unanimous that their land will turn into a wasteland, will turn into a desert.  So here we have people at an environment congress that are waltzing 200 miles south that want to suck the aquifers dry and turn it into a desert.  The hypocrisy is so deep.

What kind of madness are these World Order Caesars afflicted with?  They hope to run the lives of people for generations to come.  They are the same crowd who created a Hitler, arranged the assassination of Lincoln and Kennedy, and have indicated elsewhere that they want to drastically reduce the population of the world to make environment and development more “sustainable.”