Netanyahu Accuses Iran of Wanting to Take Over the World But It is the Tiny Elite Who Have That As Their End Goal

Iran's increasing aggression is more dangerous than that of ISIS, and the true goal of this aggression in the end is to take over the world.

— PM of Israel (@IsraeliPM) July 8, 2015

"We will reserve our right to defend ourselves against all of our enemies. We have strength, and it is great and mighty." — Benjamin Netanyahu, PM of Israel, July 15, 2015

"He even mentioned to me once that they were having a real problem trying to solve the Israel-Palestinian problem. And he talked to me once about [that] they were playing with the idea of bringing Israel to Arizona, and taking all the people from Israel and giving everybody a million dollars and setting up Israel in the State of Arizona to end that problem. That's a problem that they're not in charge of, in a sense. They're not controlling that problem." - Aaron Russo on His Conversations with Nick Rockefeller About the the Council on Foreign Relations and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (first 41 seconds of the video above)

Iranian officials sometimes respond to accusations that Tehran is seeking a nuclear weapons capability by replying that, not only do they not want a bomb, they'd actually like to see a nuclear-weapons-free Middle East. Yes, this is surely in part a deflection, meant to shift attention away from concerns about Iran's nuclear activities by not-so-subtly nodding to the one country in the region that does have nuclear weapons: Israel. But could Iran have a point? Is there something hypocritical about the world tolerating Israel's nuclear arsenal, which the country does not officially acknowledge but has been publicly known for decades, and yet punishing Iran with severe economic sanctions just for its suspected steps toward a weapons program? Even Saudi Arabia, which sees Iran as its implacable enemy and made its accommodations with Israel long ago, often joins Tehran's calls for a "nuclear-free region." And anyone not closely versed in Middle East issues might naturally wonder why the United States would accept Israeli warheads but not an Iranian program. [Source]

In April 2007 (video above), speaking at Murrells Inlet VFW Hall in South Carolina, then presidential candidate John McCain was asked when he thought the US Military might "send an air mail message to Tehran." McCain began his answer by changing the words to a popular Beach Boys song. "'Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran,' he sang to the tune of Barbara Ann." McCain then added: "Iran is dedicated to the destruction of Israel. That alone should concern us but now they are trying for nuclear capabilities. I totally support the President when he says we will not allow Iran to destroy Israel."

Netanyahu isn’t doing his argument any favors

July 13, 2015

MSNBC - All of the chatter out of Vienna suggests the Iranian nuclear talks are making substantial progress, and the prospects for a P5+1 agreement are improving. Of course, we’ve seen encouraging signs before, only to have setbacks follow soon after, so everyone will have to continue to wait as developments continue to unfold.

But while we wait, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – a fierce opponent of the international diplomacy – is ratcheting up his criticisms. This was an actual tweet published from Netanyahu’s official/verified Twitter account yesterday:

“Iran’s increasing aggression is more dangerous than that of ISIS, and the true goal of this aggression in the end is to take over the world.”

Well, no, actually that’s impossible to take seriously. Vox’s Zack Beauchamp explained that Iran is clearly a destabilizing force in the Middle East, threatening Israel and bolstering Bashar al-Assad in Syria, but “the notion that Iran could ‘take over the world’ or even wants to is so ridiculous that it would make Pinky and the Brain blush.”

Iran is a second-rate military power opposed by substantially more powerful Israel and a hostile Sunni Arab coalition led by Saudi Arabia; it can’t even take over the Middle East, let alone the world. Its current objective is to secure itself and to expand its political and military influence in the region. The latter goal is dangerous, for sure, since Iran’s strategy centers on the use of violent proxy groups like Hezbollah and Iraqi Shia militias who destabilize the countries they operate in. But a plot to take over the world this is not.

If the Israeli prime minister wants to argue that Iran is untrustworthy, no problem. If he identifies credible flaws in the international deal that’s taking shape, fine. But when Netanyahu argues that Iran’s “true goal” is taking over the planet, it’s unintentionally hilarious.

We’re talking about a country with a GDP comparable to North Carolina’s. If Iran couldn’t possibly “take over” the Middle East, why on earth would the Israeli prime minister raise the fear of Iran taking over seven continents?

Beauchamp makes the argument that Netanyahu doesn’t want to be blamed by Israeli voters if/when the international agreement is completed. As a matter of domestic politics, that’s no doubt true.

But Netanyahu isn’t just communicating with a domestic audience.

It’s important for the Israeli prime minister to be seen as credible on the international stage. When he raises concerns – about Iran or anything else – it does Israel no favors for Netanyahu to generate global eye-rolling with rants few can take seriously.

Indeed, we’re now faced with the very real possibility that the prime minister will end up with the worst of all possible scenarios: a nuclear deal he despises, a badly tarnished relationship with his country’s closest ally and benefactor, and a reputation for pushing desperate nonsense when the prevailing winds shift direction.

In a global context, a leader’s standing can make an enormous difference. The next time Netanyahu condemns developments he doesn’t like, many will invariably wonder, “Isn’t he the one who warned Iran’s true goal was world domination?”





The goal of the Council of Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission is a one-world government, most often called the New World Order. This future one-world government, this anti-Christian kingdom, is being set up in the political arena by the global elite under the flag of the United Nations.

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the international banking cabal behind it, took control of the United States in the early part of the twentieth century and is now methodically destroying American and world institutions and values. It controls national governments and multinational corporations and promotes world government through control of media, foundation grants and education. The main goal of the cabal has been to consolidate political, economic and social power in its hands while obliterating the minds of the masses to establish a militaristic, imperialistic dictatorship.

Gary Allen, in The Rockefeller File, states that the CFR is behind the many regional government plans, which would abolish city, county and state lines, leaving us at the mercy of federal bureaucrats; and that the CFR is behind the push for "land use" controls. They want "federal control of everything since they intend to control the federal government."

• By Executive Order No. 11647 on February 10, 1972, President Nixon officially abolished through regionalism the American system of government. Regionalism is the consolidation of local and state governments into large regional units and the centralization of power in bureaucratic authorities, boards and commissions, whose primary function is to administer plans and programs dictated by Washington.
• Executive Order No. 11647 divided the United States into 10 Federal Regional Councils, each controlled by an appointed bureaucrat for the stated purpose of improving coordination of the activities of all levels of government. The 10 federal regions were to be empowered to control all forms of regionalism within the United States. Regional divisions supplementing the 10 federal regions include state subregions, Federal Reserve regions, population regions, and regions to control the land, water and natural resources of America. [Executive Order 11647 was replaced by Executive Order 12149, Federal Regional Councils, on July 20, 1979.]
• Executive Order No. 11490 assigned numerous emergency preparedness functions to federal departments. Financing of regional governments is acquired through federal revenue sharing. Revenue sharing is a mechanism whereby the state and local governments become financially dependent upon the federal government. Pressure can then be applied to any level of state government that refuses to comply with the dictates of the regional government rulers. All but one of the 10 federal regional capitals is either a Federal Reserve Bank or branch bank city.

The goal of regional or metropolitan government is to eventually merge the U.S. into the "New World Order" (NWO): a one-world totalitarian goverment under the United Nations (UN). The global elite's agenda is nothing less than the complete revolutionizing of the very foundations of not only America but the entire world. Such a plan calls for the total restructuring of planetary civilization into an enlightened one world federation in which national boundaries and sovereignty are secondary and "planetary citizenship" in the "global village" is the order of the day. - Jeremiah Project

Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University history professor (deceased), in Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (1966), made this claim:

"The powers or financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations."

"I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for 20 years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret record."

According to Hermes Press:

A cabal is any small criminal group who seizes illegitimate power to benefit its members only, manipulating and impoverishing all other people within the nation. The very foundation of the capitalist system is based on the ideology of the cabal [see corporatism].

The destruction of the American mind and American institutions is now so far advanced that the international banking cabal has been able to establish a totalitarian police state without the people rising up against them.

The cabal has taken great pains to avoid publicity and recognition, to the point that most people are blind to its existence. It requires advanced powers of discernment to even see its presence, so hidden has been its subversive activity. Anyone who speaks of a cabal is immediately dismissed as a paranoid conspiracy theorist, lumped with extremists of all stripes.

It's clear that many people are so possessed by the current reactionary brainwashing that they will be unable to consider any of these ideas. But some people throughout the world are waking up to what's going on, and they need to see behind the curtain to the real criminal powers that manipulate human minds and destroy human liberties.

A significant date in the timeline toward a New World Order (a one-world religion and government under antichrist) is the creation of the Federal Reserve System, which transferred the power to create money from the American government to a group of private bankers.

The first misconception most people have is that the Federal Reserve Board is a branch of the U.S. government: it is not. THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS A PRIVATE BANKING SYSTEM. Most people believe the Federal Reserve is as American as the Constitution; however, the fact is, the Constitution in Article 1, Section 8 clearly states that the Congress, elected by the people, not a group of international bankers, shall have the power to create and regulate money.

In 1910, a small group of international bankers secretly met on Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia to devise a bill, which was titled "The Federal Reserve Act" to mask its real nature. This bill created a system controlled by private individuals who would in turn control the nation's issuance of money. Futhermore, the Federal Reserve Board (Fed), composed of 12 districts and one director (the Federal Reserve Chairman), would control the nation's financial resources by controlling the money supply and available credit, all by mortgaging the government through borrowing.

On December 23, 1913, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act (it was rushed through Congress when many representatives were out for the holidays), giving the Fed exclusive power to create and regulate money for the United States. The Fed creates money (which is backed by nothing), loans it back to the U.S. government, and then charges interest on it, which is paid by U.S. taxpayers via the Revenue Tax Act of 1913.

The Fed receives billions of dollars in interest annually and then distributes the profits to its private shareholders. Who actually owns the 12 Central Banks of the Federal Reserve? It is estimated that 300 individuals and their affiliated corporations own stock in the Fed. These private stockholders, the global elite, are connected to a London-based international banking cabal (associated with names like Rothschild and Rockefeller), which ultimately controls the Fed. When England lost the Revolutionary War with America, the House of Rothschild planned to control America by controlling its banking system, the printing of its money, and its debt; they succeeded in accomplishing this goal.

~~~

In the year 2000 there were eight countries without a Rothschild-owned Central Bank: They were Afghanistan, Russia, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

Then along came the convenient terror of 9-11. Naturally the Rothschild Zionist media (CFR) immediately sprung into action, blaming the series of attacks on New York’s Twin Towers on Islamic Militant group Al-Qaeda.  What followed was a profound assault on America’s domestic terrorist policy and its approach to Arab Nations.  Soon Iraq and Afghanistan had been added to the list of countries that had a Rothschild-owned Central Bank. Now only five countries were left without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family: Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

Apparently ‘safe’ in the knowledge that Iraq and Afghanistan were suitably ‘quelled’ ‘America’s’ (Zionist) inquisition went after Gadhafi. No sooner had THEY and their media arbitrarily labelled him a monster he was brutally murdered by so called ‘rebels’ (Video). Just prior to his death these still warring ‘rebels’ had enough time to establish a new Central Bank of Libya and form a new national oil company.

As of 2011 the only countries left without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are: Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

However, in 2012 President Obama signed into ‘law’ a defence bill creating tough new sanctions against Iran.  Again, just as with Iraq, Iran is being accused of massing weapons. Another excuse for the Zionist inquisition in America to stage an attack, and how long before Iran has a Rothschild-owned Central Bank (Video)?

Source: Political Vel Craft