An Overt Act of Tyranny - The NDAA and the Enemy Expatriation Act

Indefinite Detention - The NDAA and the Enemy Expatriation Act

January 17, 2012

Live Free or Die - Would you or I be considered an 'Enemy of the State' and eligible for Expatriation and Guantanamo Bay for merely following our moral beliefs in the sanctity of life and its' protection while witnessing a 'State' apparatus intent upon ending life for countless hundreds of thousands of innocent human beings throughout the world?

In the very deepest parts of my soul I KNOW that endless wars and turning America into an eternal battlefield in the never-ending hunt for the rarely-found boogeyman terrorist are deplorable acts of hatred inflicted by a government that seems to thrive on such acts.

As a man I must speak out against these acts of violence committed upon a people by said state and then watch as the same body passes laws now enabling them to commit the same acts of violence upon the people they are here to serve IN AMERICA!

In speaking out I know that the government has stopped serving the people while attempting to intimidate the people; quite fortunately the people have shown that they are having none of it.

A government of America or any other land, should that government become corrupted, essentially becomes the enemy of the people of that land and of it's 'body of laws'. Should said corrupted government attempt to abolish the long standing and lawful laws of the land and attempt to label anyone who disagrees with their now corrupted government an 'Enemy', then would there not be now more than 100 million 'enemies' of corruption, i.e. the state, throughout the land? Would it not be a duty of the just man to disagree with and protest against the state once that state becomes corrupt and fails it's most basic duty: to protect the individual rights of its' citizens?

Would one be labeled an enemy of the state merely for disagreeing with the states endless wars and refusing to accept them endlessly as the sole view of the future of humanity as some would like us to do?

Who will be the first person that they throw away into Guantanamo Bay for merely insisting that yes, indeed, black IS black and white IS white; despite how much THEY wished it were not so...

Corbett Report Radio 043 – Keeping the Oath with Stewart Rhodes:

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Stewart Rhodes of OathKeepers.org joins us to go over the legislative history that has led us to the NDAA’s doorstep. From Ex parte Milligan to HR3166, Rhodes breaks down how the Bill of Rights has been methodically stripped from America and what his organization is doing about it.

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges has filed suit against President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to challenge the legality of the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes controversial provisions authorizing the military to jail anyone it considers a terrorism suspect anywhere in the world, without charge or trial. Sections of the bill are written so broadly that critics say they could encompass journalists who report on terror-related issues, such as Hedges, for supporting enemy forces.

“It is clearly unconstitutional,” Hedges says of the bill. “It is a huge and egregious assault against our democracy. It overturns over 200 years of law, which has kept the military out of domestic policing.”

We speak with Hedges, now a senior fellow at the Nation Institute, and former New York Times foreign correspondent who was part of a team of reporters that was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 2002 for the paper’s coverage of global terrorism. We are also joined by Hedges’ attorney Carl Mayer, who filed the litigation on his behalf in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.